German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the United States continues to be the most important partner for Germany within the North Atlantic Alliance, seeking to ease concerns about relations after the U.S. announced plans to scale back its military footprint in the country.
In remarks made during an interview with public broadcaster ARD that is scheduled to air Sunday, Merz said: "I remain convinced that the Americans are the most important partner for us in the North Atlantic Alliance." The statement was offered as officials and observers considered what the announced U.S. troop reductions in Germany might mean for the broader alliance.
The chancellor was asked whether the decision by Washington to reduce its force presence in Germany was connected to policy differences between him and U.S. President Donald Trump, specifically over strategy toward Iran. Merz explicitly rejected that linkage, saying there was no connection between the troop reduction plans and disagreements on Iran policy.
While acknowledging that differences of opinion exist between Berlin and Washington, Merz sought to play down any suggestion of significant friction with the Trump administration. He underlined the continuing importance of the transatlantic partnership within NATO and framed the relationship as central despite isolated policy disagreements.
The comments come in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. announcement about adjusting its military presence in Germany. Merz emphasized that differing views on particular issues do not negate the foundational security relationship between the two countries within the North Atlantic Alliance.
The chancellor's remarks aimed to reassure domestic and international audiences that Berlin still regards the United States as a pivotal NATO partner, even as both sides navigate occasional policy divergences.
Summary of key elements
- Merz reaffirmed the United States as Germany's most important NATO partner.
- The comments followed a U.S. announcement to reduce its military presence in Germany.
- Merz denied any connection between the troop reductions and disagreements with the U.S. president over Iran strategy.