World May 28, 2026 08:22 PM

Chicago U.S. Attorney Says No Criminal Probe Opened Into E. Jean Carroll

Office rebuts report of Justice Department perjury investigation tied to Carroll's testimony and outside funding

By Avery Klein

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago issued a public denial that it has opened - or ever opened - a criminal investigation into writer E. Jean Carroll, rejecting a report that the Justice Department had begun probing whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony related to two civil suits she won against former President Donald Trump. An anonymous source had told reporters the alleged inquiry focused on a 2022 deposition in which Carroll said she received no outside funding, later contradicted when her lawyers disclosed that Reid Hoffman paid some legal bills. Court rulings and jury verdicts in 2023 and 2024 are central to the matter; an acting attorney general has been recused from the department’s work because of prior representation of Trump in Carroll-related appeals.

Chicago U.S. Attorney Says No Criminal Probe Opened Into E. Jean Carroll

Key Points

  • The Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office, via U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros, says it has not opened - and has never opened - a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll.
  • An anonymous source told reporters that the Justice Department had begun a probe into whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony tied to her successful lawsuits against Donald Trump, focusing on a 2022 deposition about outside funding later shown to include payments from Reid Hoffman.
  • Court outcomes and appellate findings central to the public reporting include a May 2023 jury verdict finding Trump sexually assaulted and defamed Carroll, a January 2024 jury award of $83.3 million for defamation, and a 2024 appeals court determination addressing Carroll’s recollection of limited outside funding.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago issued a clear statement on Thursday denying that it has launched any criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the writer who won two civil cases against former President Donald Trump.

"The Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office can confirm that it has not opened - and has never opened - a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll," the office said, quoting U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros.

The denial followed reporting based on an anonymous source who told reporters on Wednesday that the Justice Department had begun a probe, led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago, into whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony tied to two civil lawsuits she successfully pursued against Trump.


What the anonymous source said

The person familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity because the investigation was described as ongoing, told reporters the purported probe concerned testimony given in cases decided in 2023 and 2024 in which Carroll alleged she was sexually abused in a New York department store and that Trump had defamed her by calling her a liar.

The source said prosecutors were focused on a 2022 deposition in which Carroll stated she had received no outside funding for her suit. Her lawyers subsequently disclosed that Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn co-founder, had paid some of her legal bills.

The source cautioned that the opening of a probe does not necessarily mean charges will follow.


Legal rulings and background cited in reporting

Jurors reached verdicts in Carroll’s cases against Trump in stages. In May 2023 a jury concluded that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll and defamed her, while finding he had not raped her. In January 2024 another jury found he had defamed her and awarded damages totaling $83.3 million.

An appeals court in 2024 weighed in on the funding question, concluding that "Ms. Carroll plausibly represented that she had forgotten about the limited outside funding counsel obtained in September 2020 when this question was first posed to her in 2022, and the additional discovery did not indicate otherwise."


Department leadership and recusals

The reporting also noted that Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has been recused from the department’s investigation into the matter because he had served as one of Trump’s personal attorneys on the Carroll appeals. The reporting added that Blanche moved quickly to act on demands from Trump after taking over from his predecessor.

The article said that since the prior year the Justice Department under Trump has pursued a range of investigations targeting the president’s opponents and in some instances has brought criminal charges.


Responses and unanswered items

Carroll’s lawyer, Robbie Kaplan, did not immediately respond to requests for comment, according to the reporting. The office’s categorical denial leaves unanswered why the anonymous source described an investigation, and whether any preliminary review had been undertaken elsewhere within the department.

The situation remains fluid in public reporting: the U.S. Attorney’s Office statement disputes the account that an investigation led by that office was opened, while the anonymous source described an inquiry centered on the 2022 deposition and subsequent funding disclosures.


Summary

The Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office has publicly stated it has not opened a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, contradicting an anonymous-source report that the Justice Department had initiated a perjury probe over Carroll’s deposition statements about outside funding related to her lawsuits against Donald Trump. Key elements of the underlying litigation and appellate findings, and a recusal by the acting attorney general, remain part of the record cited in reporting.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over whether the anonymous-source report reflects an internal review or an open criminal investigation - this ambiguity affects legal and political actors and could influence public perceptions of ongoing litigation.
  • Potential for conflicting public accounts between a federal prosecutor’s office and anonymous sources, which can create reputational and procedural risks for parties involved and for the department’s handling of politically sensitive matters.
  • Recusal of the acting attorney general from the department’s work on Carroll-related matters raises procedural complexity and may limit decision-making continuity within the Justice Department.

More from World

Colorado Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Paramedics in Elijah McClain Death Jun 4, 2026 U.S. Treasury Adds Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel to Sanctions List Jun 4, 2026 Zelenskiy Invites Putin to Direct Talks in Open Letter, Proposes Ceasefire During Negotiations Jun 4, 2026 Zelenskyy Calls for Direct Talks With Putin, Offering Ceasefire During Negotiations Jun 4, 2026 Putin Says Russia Will Prevail if Needed, But Offers Diplomacy Backed by Unspecified Compromises Jun 4, 2026