World June 1, 2026 03:04 PM

Appeals Court Pauses Expulsions but OKs Enlistment Ban for Transgender People

D.C. Circuit allows Pentagon to bar new transgender recruits while blocking removal of current service members amid ongoing litigation

By Marcus Reed

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a split ruling that permits the Pentagon to continue barring transgender people from enlisting in the armed forces for the moment, while preventing the military from discharging current transgender service members as legal challenges continue. The court found the 2025 policy was motivated unlawfully in part, but also affirmed wide military authority over enlistment standards, creating a temporary distinction between prospective recruits and active duty personnel.

Appeals Court Pauses Expulsions but OKs Enlistment Ban for Transgender People

Key Points

  • A D.C. Circuit panel found the 2025 policy was unlawfully motivated "by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group," but allowed the Pentagon to keep transgender people from enlisting pending litigation.
  • The court blocked the expulsion of current transgender service members, citing the greater hardship of ending a military career than delaying its start.
  • The ruling takes place amid broader federal actions affecting transgender recognition, including dropped lawsuits on behalf of transgender workers, ended settlements for transgender students and investigations into providers of gender-affirming care for minors; sectors affected include defense, healthcare and education.

A federal appeals court on Monday issued a mixed decision over the Trump administration’s 2025 policy restricting transgender people from military service, allowing the Department of Defense to keep transgender individuals from joining the armed forces for now while blocking the expulsion of currently serving transgender members as litigation proceeds.

In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the 2025 policy was unlawfully motivated "by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group." At the same time, the court emphasized the broad discretion the Pentagon holds to set enlistment criteria and said it could maintain a ban on new transgender enlistees pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed by transgender current and prospective service members.

Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote for the majority that "It appears to us to be a much greater hardship to end a military career than to delay the start of one." That language underpinned the panel’s decision to protect those already serving from immediate removal while allowing the enlistment bar to stand.

In a dissent, Circuit Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, argued that courts should not make determinations about military personnel policies: courts "have neither the expertise nor the authority to decide whether the military can exclude the plaintiffs from its ranks," he wrote.

Jennifer Levi of GLAD Law, who represents the plaintiffs, praised the ruling in a statement. "This decisive ruling confirms that the Trump Administration has no legitimate basis to discharge transgender service members who have met every demanding standard and proven, time and again, their fitness and dedication to serve," she said.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


The appeals court decision partially upholds an earlier ruling from a Washington, D.C.-based federal district judge that had blocked implementation of the entire policy pending further litigation. That judge had found the policy amounted to sex discrimination and likely violated the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.

President Donald Trump issued an executive order in January 2025 stating that adopting a transgender identity "conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth moved to implement that executive order soon after, which prompted the legal challenges now before the D.C. Circuit.

The appeals court ruling sits against a backdrop of broader administrative actions affecting transgender recognition and accommodation across federal agencies. According to the record in this litigation, federal agencies have dropped lawsuits filed on behalf of transgender workers, ended settlements benefiting transgender students and launched investigations into hospitals and doctors for providing gender-affirming treatment to minors.

The military comprises about 1.3 million active-duty personnel, per Department of Defense figures. Estimates of how many transgender service members serve vary: transgender rights advocates put the figure as high as 15,000, while officials describe the number as being in the low thousands.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2025 allowed the policy to be implemented by lifting a judge’s ruling in a separate case originating in the state of Washington. The Supreme Court did not provide an explanation for that action. Judge Wilkins noted in the D.C. Circuit’s opinion that the Supreme Court "may have been ruling on a technicality rather than the merits of the case."

The litigation challenging the 2025 policy continues. For now, the practical effect of the appeals court decision is a split outcome: individuals who have already built military careers are shielded from immediate discharge, while those who seek to enlist and identify as transgender remain barred from joining until the courts resolve the underlying constitutional and statutory questions.

Risks

  • Ongoing legal uncertainty - The case remains in litigation and could produce further rulings that change the status of enlistment and retention policies; this uncertainty affects military human resources planning and could influence defense sector staffing assumptions.
  • Policy flux across federal agencies - Parallel administrative actions affecting transgender recognition and services may lead to additional legal challenges or operational disruptions for healthcare providers and educational institutions involved with transgender populations.
  • Operational and personnel impacts - The split court outcome creates a two-tier situation for potential recruits versus active service members, which may complicate recruiting, retention and workforce projections within the defense sector.

More from World

Zelenskiy Invites Putin to Direct Talks in Open Letter, Proposes Ceasefire During Negotiations Jun 4, 2026 Zelenskyy Calls for Direct Talks With Putin, Offering Ceasefire During Negotiations Jun 4, 2026 Putin Says Russia Will Prevail if Needed, But Offers Diplomacy Backed by Unspecified Compromises Jun 4, 2026 Steering Board Fails to Name Successor to Bosnia’s High Representative Jun 4, 2026 Why U.S.-Brokered Truces Have Not Halted Fighting Across the Middle East Jun 4, 2026