World June 17, 2026 08:22 AM

U.N. Experts Warn Over Hunger Strike by British Couple Jailed in Iran

Special rapporteurs say prolonged refusal of food poses a medical emergency as concerns grow over trial fairness and opaque appeals

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

United Nations independent human rights experts have raised alarm about the health and legal situation of Craig and Lindsay Foreman, two British nationals serving 10-year sentences in Iran on espionage charges they deny. The experts report prolonged hunger strikes by both prisoners and say their convictions followed proceedings that did not meet basic fair trial standards. Family members say an appeal hearing this month occurred without their knowledge and that authorities provided little information about the process.

U.N. Experts Warn Over Hunger Strike by British Couple Jailed in Iran
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Two British nationals, Craig and Lindsay Foreman, were given 10-year prison sentences in February on espionage charges they deny.
  • U.N. special rapporteurs Alice Jill Edwards and Mai Sato report Lindsay has been on hunger strike for more than 30 days and Craig for more than 20 days, and warn the situation has reached a medical emergency after 30 days without food.
  • Family members say an appeal hearing this month happened without their knowledge and that authorities provided little information; Britain calls the sentence "totally unjustifiable" and pledges to press for release.

U.N. human rights experts said on Wednesday they are gravely concerned about the condition of two British nationals incarcerated in Iran who have been convicted on charges of espionage and are now refusing food in protest.

Craig and Lindsay Foreman received 10-year prison sentences in February on espionage charges, which the couple reject. Family members have said an appeal hearing held earlier this month took place without their knowledge and that they were provided with minimal information about the proceedings.

Two independent U.N. special rapporteurs, Alice Jill Edwards and Mai Sato, reported that Lindsay Foreman has been on a hunger strike for more than 30 days while her husband Craig has not eaten for over 20 days. In a statement, the experts warned: "After 30 days without food, this is a medical emergency."

The rapporteurs added that, in their assessment, "Lindsay and Craig Foreman should not be in prison." They said the couple "appear to have been wrongfully detained, prosecuted on highly questionable grounds, and sentenced after proceedings that failed to meet basic fair trial guarantees."

Earlier in April, the same experts wrote to Iranian authorities to protest what they described as a pattern of foreign nationals being detained for political purposes. There has been no immediate reply from the Iranian mission in Geneva to requests for comment on the allegations raised by the rapporteurs.

The British government has described the Foremans' sentence as "totally unjustifiable" and has said it will continue to press for their release. The family, however, has criticised the response from London, asserting that the couple are being used as "human shields" amid regional conflict.


Context and constraints

Details available to the U.N. experts and the family, including the length of the hunger strikes, the convictions in February, the contested appeal hearing this month, and the quoted statements, form the basis of current public concern. There is no public record in the material provided here of any response from Iranian officials to the specific allegations, nor is there further information about the appeal's procedure beyond the family’s account that it occurred without their knowledge.

Risks

  • Immediate health risk to the detained individuals due to prolonged hunger strikes; this is directly stated by U.N. experts and affects humanitarian and medical response sectors.
  • Diplomatic and consular tensions between Britain and Iran, given the government's characterization of the sentence as "totally unjustifiable" and continued efforts to secure release; this may impact foreign affairs and legal/consular services.
  • Ongoing lack of transparency about legal proceedings and appeals, as reported by the family and the U.N. experts, creates legal uncertainty and raises concerns for international human rights organisations and related advocacy groups.

More from World

Somaliland Says Israel Is Training Its Forces, Rejects Reports of Military Base Talks Jun 17, 2026 Ebola Response in Eastern Congo Strained as Cases Rise and Resources Run Short Jun 17, 2026 Iran-U.S. Memorandum Seen Strengthening Hezbollah’s Position in Lebanon Jun 17, 2026 World Cup’s Homecoming in Mexico Leaves Many Locals Stranded Outside the Experience Jun 17, 2026 Allies Bolster NATO Crisis Forces to Cover U.S. Reductions, Rutte Says Jun 17, 2026