World May 7, 2026 02:34 PM

U.S. Pushes U.N. Resolution to Halt Strait of Hormuz Hostilities, Faces Likely Russian and Chinese Vetoes

Draft backed by Gulf states seeks Iran ceasefire compliance and mine disclosures; Moscow and Beijing raised strong objections in closed session

By Derek Hwang

The United States, joined by Gulf partners, circulated a United Nations Security Council resolution demanding Iran stop attacks and the planting of mines in the Strait of Hormuz. Diplomats said Russia and China raised substantive objections during a closed-door review and are expected to block the measure with vetoes, complicating U.S. diplomatic aims ahead of a planned presidential visit to China.

U.S. Pushes U.N. Resolution to Halt Strait of Hormuz Hostilities, Faces Likely Russian and Chinese Vetoes

Key Points

  • The United States and Bahrain drafted a U.N. Security Council resolution, supported by several Gulf states, demanding Iran stop attacks and disclose mine locations in the Strait of Hormuz - sectors affected include shipping and energy transportation.
  • Diplomats said Russia and China raised strong objections in a closed council session and are expected to veto the draft, underscoring geopolitical divisions within the 15-member Security Council - implications for international diplomacy and defense policy.
  • The draft invokes Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, which enables measures from sanctions to military action, a provision criticized by China and cited by opponents as a source of bias in the text.

The United States on Thursday pressed U.N. member states to support a Security Council resolution calling on Iran to cease attacks and the placement of naval mines in the Strait of Hormuz, but diplomats said Beijing and Moscow appeared poised to use their veto power against the proposal.

U.S. President Donald Trump is due to travel to China next week, and a Chinese veto would present a diplomatically sensitive moment as talks on Iran-related conflict are likely to feature on the agenda.

A month ago a different resolution backed by Washington, which critics said risked enabling U.S. military action against Iran, failed after Russia and China cast vetoes in the 15-member U.N. Security Council. The new draft, authored by the United States and Bahrain with the backing of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar, seeks to again draw a firm council response.

Standing side by side with envoys from Gulf states that support the proposal, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, addressed reporters and warned of the precedent at stake for any state opposing the text. He said any country that "seek to throw it out, are setting a very, very dangerous precedent." Waltz added: "We have to ask ourselves, if a country chooses to oppose such a simple proposition, do they really want peace?"

Diplomats who attended a closed session of the Security Council this week said the draft encountered sharp criticism from Russia and China and that both capitals are likely to veto the measure if it is put to a vote. One diplomat reported that Russia urged the resolution be withdrawn or completely rewritten. According to the same diplomat, China argued the text showed bias and objected to its use of Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, the provision that permits the Council to adopt measures that range from sanctions to the authorization of military action.

Bahrain's U.N. envoy Jamal Fares Alrowaiei affirmed his country's intent to keep engaging with fellow council members, saying Bahrain looked forward "to working constructively with all council members in the days ahead to finalize this text."

The draft accuses Iran of breaching the existing ceasefire and of conduct that includes "actions and threats aimed at closing, obstructing, tolling" freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. It demands that Iran immediately stop attacks, reveal the locations of any mines it has placed, and refrain from obstructing mine clearance operations.

Waltz's statements came as some sources and officials indicated the United States and Iran were nearing a temporary arrangement to halt the fighting, with Tehran reported to be examining a proposal that would pause hostilities while leaving the most contentious matters unresolved.

While neither Moscow nor Beijing has issued a formal public comment on the new draft, diplomats briefed on council deliberations described both countries as taking a firm stance during internal discussions. On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio framed the proposed resolution as a test of the U.N.'s usefulness and appealed to China and Russia not to veto it.

Risks

  • Almost certain vetoes from Russia and China could block a multilateral Security Council response, prolonging diplomatic gridlock - this uncertainty affects policy coordination in international security and defense sectors.
  • The draft's invocation of Chapter VII drew criticism as biased, creating legal and political contention that may limit the resolution's enforceability and complicate sanctions or other measures - relevant to legal and international regulatory frameworks.
  • If Iran's mines are not fully disclosed or clearance operations are impeded, freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz could remain at risk, with potential consequences for global shipping and energy markets.

More from World

Zelenskiy Criticizes Russian Limited Ceasefire as 'Strange and Inappropriate' Logic May 7, 2026 Trump Orders Withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. Troops from Germany, Setting Up Legal and Political Friction May 7, 2026 U.S. Targets Iraqi Deputy Oil Minister and Iran-Aligned Militias with Sanctions May 7, 2026 Ukraine's Lead Negotiator Visits Miami as U.S.-Mediated Talks Remain Deadlocked May 7, 2026 ASEAN Agrees to Virtual Meeting with Myanmar Foreign Minister as Re-engagement Talks Move Forward May 7, 2026