Stock Markets July 2, 2026 09:07 AM

Ford CEO Urges USMCA Revisions to Favor U.S. Vehicle Makers, Penalize Import-Heavy Firms

Jim Farley says changes should reward domestic production and make it harder for firms that rely on imports to compete

By Caleb Monroe
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
GM F TM

Ford Motor Company CEO Jim Farley is pressing for adjustments to the USMCA trade arrangement that would give advantages to automakers with strong U.S. production footprints and impose penalties on companies that depend heavily on imports. Farley highlighted Ford's U.S. assembly leadership, export volumes and relatively low import rate, and contrasted those figures with higher import ratios at General Motors and Toyota. The comments come amid changes to U.S. trade policy oversight of the trilateral pact with Canada and Mexico.

Ford CEO Urges USMCA Revisions to Favor U.S. Vehicle Makers, Penalize Import-Heavy Firms
GM F TM
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Ford CEO Jim Farley called for USMCA changes to reward automakers that build primarily in the United States and to penalize firms that depend heavily on imports - impacts the automotive and manufacturing sectors.
  • Ford reported assembling more than 2 million U.S. vehicles last year, exporting 311,000 units and importing 378,000 vehicles (17% of its 2.2 million U.S. sales) - relevant to company unit economics and trade flows.
  • General Motors and Toyota are the top importers in 2025, with GM importing 1.17 million vehicles (41% of U.S. sales) and Toyota importing more than 1.19 million units (47% of domestic sales) - affecting competitive positioning within the auto market.

Ford Motor Company Chief Executive Jim Farley urged modifications to the USMCA North American trade agreement that, in his view, should favor manufacturers that build vehicles in the United States and impose consequences on automakers that rely substantially on imports.

Speaking in a phone interview with CNBC on Wednesday, Farley said the revamped deal should make U.S. manufacturers more competitive against companies bringing vehicles in from Japan and South Korea. He said Ford seeks provisions that confer benefits on automakers that primarily produce within the United States.

"It's imperative that any new agreement makes it easier, not harder, to compete with U.S. makers who import from Japan, South Korea and global competitors that import from those locations," Farley said. "That's the key for us."


Farley framed his argument by pointing to Ford's scale of U.S. manufacturing. The company assembled more than 2 million vehicles in the United States last year, a figure he cited as the highest among automakers operating in the country. Ford also exported 311,000 units to over 60 international markets while importing 378,000 vehicles, which represented 17% of its 2.2 million U.S. sales.

By contrast, industry data show that General Motors and Toyota Motor are both leaders in U.S. sales and also rank as the top two importers of vehicles in 2025. GM imported 1.17 million vehicles, equal to 41% of its U.S. sales, while Toyota imported more than 1.19 million units, or 47% of its domestic sales.

"Ford's a leader of U.S. auto production with the most U.S.-built vehicles but, more importantly, we import very few, and we export the most, and we have the most UAW [union] workers here," Farley said. "So we're very proud, especially of the ratio between what we build here and what we import."


Farley's comments arrive against a backdrop of policy shifts: the Trump administration chose not to renew the trilateral trade pact with Canada and Mexico and instead opted for annual reviews of the treaty, a process that could ultimately terminate the agreement by 2036. Separately, industry figures indicate the auto sector accounted for roughly 18% of U.S. trade with Canada and Mexico in the last year.

Farley's proposal centers on altering incentives and penalties within trade rules so that automakers with higher domestic production are advantaged relative to competitors that import a significant portion of their vehicles. The CEO positioned Ford's production and trade ratios as justification for such changes but did not detail specific policy language or mechanisms for assessment and enforcement.

The debate touches on manufacturing footprints, trade flows and how trade rules intersect with corporate sourcing decisions. Any changes to the USMCA or the rules governing North American trade would have implications for automakers, suppliers and cross-border commerce tied to the auto industry.

Risks

  • Potential trade policy changes could alter competitive dynamics across the auto sector, impacting manufacturers, suppliers and cross-border trade volumes between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
  • Uncertainty from the decision not to renew the trilateral pact and the shift to annual reviews could create regulatory volatility, with the treaty subject to termination by 2036.
  • Shifts in incentives and penalties tied to import levels could affect company margins and supply-chain decisions, particularly for automakers with high import ratios.

More from Stock Markets

Figma Shares Rise After Adobe Upgrade, Backed by Citigroup Initiation and Strong Q1 Metrics Jul 2, 2026 Jabil Shares Slide After Company Files Mixed Shelf Registration With SEC Jul 2, 2026 Palantir, Rivian Lead Wide Swings Among Market-Cap Movers on Thursday Jul 2, 2026 Apple Shares Surge as Talks With Chinese Memory Suppliers and Demand Signals Ease Investor Concerns Jul 2, 2026 Anthropic Advances Early Work on In-House AI Chip, Holds Talks with Samsung on 2nm Manufacturing Jul 2, 2026