Stock Markets May 28, 2026 03:47 PM

California Attorney General Sues 23andMe Over 2023 Data Breach Affecting Millions

State alleges company downplayed the scope of a breach that exposed genetic and health information for an estimated 6.9 million U.S. customers

By Ajmal Hussain

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court against Chrome Holding Co - the legal entity for 23andMe - over a data breach that began in April 2023 and lasted roughly five months. The complaint says the company ignored warnings and minimized the breach that exposed genetic, health and ancestry information for about 6.9 million U.S. customers, including roughly 856,000 Californians. Bonta is seeking civil fines of "multiple millions" under California’s Genetic Information Privacy Act and state consumer protection laws; the case must be reconciled with the company’s Chapter 11 proceedings and prior settlements resolving many customer claims.

California Attorney General Sues 23andMe Over 2023 Data Breach Affecting Millions

Key Points

  • California sued Chrome Holding Co - the legal name for 23andMe - over a data breach that began in April 2023 and lasted about five months.
  • The breach exposed genetic, health, ancestry and related personal information for an estimated 6.9 million U.S. customers, including about 856,000 Californians.
  • Attorney General Rob Bonta is seeking civil fines of "multiple millions" under the state’s Genetic Information Privacy Act and consumer protection laws; collection would need to proceed through the company’s bankruptcy process.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a civil lawsuit against Chrome Holding Co, the corporate name for genetics testing firm 23andMe, accusing the company of failing to adequately address a major data breach that began in April 2023 and persisted for about five months.

The complaint, lodged in San Francisco Superior Court, alleges that 23andMe overlooked numerous warnings that its systems had been compromised and understated the severity of the incident. According to the filing, the breach exposed sensitive personal details - including customers' health information, genetic predispositions, biological relatives, ancestry, and ethnicity - for an estimated 6.9 million customers across the United States. Bonta said approximately 856,000 of those affected were California residents.

On a conference call with reporters, Bonta sharply criticized the company’s response, stating: "This data breach, and the company’s handling of it, was entirely unacceptable." The lawsuit seeks civil penalties that the attorney general described as potentially totaling "multiple millions" of dollars for alleged violations of California’s Genetic Information Privacy Act and state consumer protection statutes.

The legal action arrives roughly 14 months after the company filed for bankruptcy in St. Louis. Bonta acknowledged that any effort to collect a monetary judgment would need to proceed through the bankruptcy process.

Federal court activity tied to the breach has already produced a separate resolution for many customers. The federal judge overseeing 23andMe’s bankruptcy approved the creation of a $30 million to $50 million fund to resolve most U.S. customer claims stemming from the breach. That settlement also addressed allegations that 23andMe failed to notify certain customers - specifically those of Chinese and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry - that a hacker appeared to target them and subsequently offered their information for sale on the dark web.

23andMe, headquartered in Palo Alto, California, was founded in 2006 and became a public company in 2021. In March 2025 the company filed for Chapter 11 protection, citing the data breach and related litigation, heightened competition, and waning consumer demand for genetic testing products as factors behind the filing.

Last July, TTAM Research Institute - a nonprofit controlled by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki - acquired the company’s assets in a $305 million purchase. Bonta opposed that sale on privacy grounds, arguing that California law affords consumers the right to consent to transfers of their "most sensitive personal data." He said the legal challenge to the sale remains pending.


Context and implications

  • The lawsuit centers on alleged violations of genetic privacy protections and consumer law.
  • Monetary relief sought may be constrained by ongoing bankruptcy proceedings and prior settlements.
  • The case highlights tensions between asset transfers in bankruptcy and consumer privacy rights when sensitive personal data is involved.

Neither 23andMe nor its legal representatives immediately responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over recovery of civil penalties and damages because any judgment would be subject to the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy process - impacts legal, consumer protection, and financial sectors.
  • Potential limits to remedies for affected customers given the previously approved $30 million to $50 million fund that resolved most U.S. customer claims - affects consumers and the legal/claims resolution market.
  • Ongoing dispute over the $305 million asset sale to TTAM Research Institute and pending privacy challenge may prolong uncertainty about control of assets and consumer consent rights - affects privacy law enforcement and corporate transactions involving sensitive data.

More from Stock Markets

S&P Global Upholds Fast-Entry Rules Ahead of SpaceX Public Debut Jun 4, 2026 Insperity Shares Climb After CEO Buys 233,000 Shares Jun 4, 2026 SpaceX Signals Firmness on $135 IPO Price as Roadshow Begins Jun 4, 2026 CME Chief Warns CFTC Approval of Perpetual Crypto Futures Could Create Systemic Risk Jun 4, 2026 AmperCap Raises $125 Million in NASDAQ Listing as It Targets U.S.-Mexico Middle-Market Deals Jun 4, 2026