Stock Markets July 9, 2026 11:42 PM

Underwriters Collect Nearly $260M from SK Hynix U.S. Listing; Fees Rate Tops SpaceX IPO's Percentage

Global banks pocket about 0.97% of SK Hynix's $26.5 billion U.S. share sale, outpacing SpaceX fees as a percentage of deal size

By Hana Yamamoto
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
C BAC GS JPM

Banks and brokerages that led SK Hynix’s U.S. depository receipt sale received close to $260 million in underwriting and placement fees, equal to roughly 0.97% of the $26.5 billion raised. That percentage exceeds the fee rate earned by advisers on SpaceX’s recent $75 billion initial public offering, whose bankers collected about $500 million or 0.67% of proceeds.

Underwriters Collect Nearly $260M from SK Hynix U.S. Listing; Fees Rate Tops SpaceX IPO's Percentage
C BAC GS JPM
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Underwriters on SK Hynix’s U.S. depository receipt sale received nearly $260 million in fees, about 0.97% of the roughly $26.5 billion raised.
  • SpaceX’s recent $75 billion IPO generated about $500 million in fees, equivalent to approximately 0.67% of proceeds, a smaller fee percentage than SK Hynix’s deal.
  • Citigroup earned over $70 million on the SK Hynix transaction, about 20% more than other banks on the deal; Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan were also global coordinators.

Investment banks and broker-dealers that underwrote SK Hynix’s U.S. share offering earned nearly $260 million in fees, according to the company’s filings. Those fees amount to roughly 0.97% of the approximately $26.5 billion raised when the South Korean chipmaker priced its U.S. depository receipts at $149 each.

The fee rate on SK Hynix’s placement is higher as a percentage of proceeds than the fees reported by advisers on SpaceX’s record-setting public sale last month. SpaceX’s bankers received about $500 million, which equated to 0.67% of the $75 billion IPO, filings and public accounts show.


How fees broke down

Citigroup received in excess of $70 million from the SK Hynix transaction, a sum the company said was roughly 20% greater than what other banks on the deal earned, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter who declined to be identified when discussing confidential information. In the transaction, Citigroup served as a joint global coordinator and acted as the depository bank.

Other global coordinators on the listing included Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. A representative for Citigroup declined to comment on the fee amount. JPMorgan also declined to comment. Bank of America and Goldman Sachs did not respond to requests for comment.


Deal specifics and market context

SK Hynix’s U.S. listing raised about $26.5 billion after pricing its depository receipts at $149, which the filings note was 2.7% higher than the company’s average share price in Seoul over the prior three trading days. The fee percentage disclosed in SK Hynix’s filings - about 0.97% - reflects the ratio of total fees to the total capital raised.

By comparison, advisers on SpaceX’s initial public offering earned fees that amounted to 0.67% of the $75 billion in proceeds. That SpaceX offering was described in public accounts as eclipsing the prior record set by Saudi Aramco in 2019, as well as SK Hynix’s own U.S. listing this week.


Implications for banks and capital markets

The SK Hynix placement demonstrates that fee levels can vary materially between large equity offerings even when both deals rank among the largest public transactions. Firms positioned as joint global coordinators on sizable listings captured the largest fee shares in the SK Hynix sale, with Citigroup reported as the top earner among them.

Market participants and observers will note the absolute dollar sums involved and the differing fee percentages when assessing compensation practices across major equity transactions.

Risks

  • Fee levels reported are sensitive to deal structure and roles - differences in coordinator roles could affect compensation; this impacts investment banking and capital markets participants.
  • Public comments on fees are limited as some banks declined to comment or did not respond; opaque disclosure could create uncertainty for market observers and clients in financial services.
  • Comparisons across transactions may be incomplete if filings and public statements omit certain fee components - this uncertainty affects analysts evaluating underwriting economics in the banking sector.

More from Stock Markets

Fast Retailing Shares Drop After Strong Results as Yen Weakness Clouds Overseas Profits Jul 10, 2026 Tencent in advanced talks to become Manus’ largest shareholder after Beijing forces Meta reversal Jul 10, 2026 Disney Mulls Free Disney+ Tier as Viewers Move Toward Ad-Supported Services Jul 10, 2026 Asian markets climb as chip stocks rebound on renewed AI spending optimism despite Middle East tensions Jul 9, 2026 MiniMax Secures $2 Billion in New Financing, CEO Commits Equity and Salary Pledge Toward AGI Drive Jul 9, 2026