Stock Markets July 23, 2026 05:53 PM

SAP CFO: Enterprise AI Must Move Past Chatbots to Deliver Measurable Returns

Dominik Asam says governed, process-embedded AI and clean company data are prerequisites for reliable gains in finance and supply chain

By Marcus Reed
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

SAP's chief financial officer said that meaningful returns from artificial intelligence in enterprise software will depend on moving beyond chatbots and coding assistants into AI systems tightly integrated with core business processes. Speaking after SAP's second-quarter results, Dominik Asam argued that accuracy, data governance and cost control matter more than simply using the most advanced model, especially in areas such as finance and supply chain where mistakes can cascade.

SAP CFO: Enterprise AI Must Move Past Chatbots to Deliver Measurable Returns
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • SAP CFO Dominik Asam says most AI usage today focuses on lower-risk applications such as chatbots and coding assistants.
  • Applying AI to finance and supply chain is harder because errors can compound across multiple process steps, increasing compliance and reliability requirements.
  • Asam argues that governed, process-specific AI systems that run on usable, governed company data - and that balance reliability with cost - will produce returns more than general-purpose frontier models.

SAP's finance chief warned that the current bulk of AI usage in enterprise environments concentrates on relatively low-risk applications - and that the industry must progress into more demanding process automation before broad productivity gains become apparent.

Speaking to reporters after SAP's second-quarter results, CFO Dominik Asam said the "lion's share" of AI token consumption today is absorbed by what he described as "low-hanging fruits" - primarily coding assistants and chatbots. In those settings, he noted, the consequences of AI hallucinations are limited because the outputs tend to carry lower business risk if they fail.

By contrast, Asam said, embedding AI into core functions such as finance and supply chain is materially more difficult. Errors in those workflows can propagate through multiple steps and create compounded issues that raise compliance and reliability concerns. "If you have some hallucinations in the process, the errors will actually compound statistically over many steps," he said, referring specifically to finance workflows. That, he added, "requires much more excruciating assurance levels."

Asam framed the more valuable opportunities - the "high-hanging fruit" - not as deploying a generic plug-and-play large language model across an enterprise but as designing governed systems tailored to specific business processes. That approach, he said, hinges on companies making their own data usable and governed so that AI can operate with corporate knowledge and established controls.

"The idea that AI will solve all these problems if they are messy, legacy data silos is not true," Asam said, adding that relying on that path produces "extremely high token costs." He cautioned that simply accessing the most advanced model is not always the correct choice; instead, organizations will favor the cheapest reliable solution that achieves the required outcome safely - whether that is conventional software, an open-source model or a pricier frontier model.

The comments underline SAP's stance that returns from generative AI are more likely to emerge from governed, business-specific implementations than from general-purpose models. For sectors such as finance, supply chain and enterprise software, the emphasis will be on data readiness, reliability and cost-efficient model selection rather than model size alone.


Impacted sectors: enterprise software, finance, supply chain and logistics.

Risks

  • Hallucinations in AI applied to core workflows can compound over multiple steps, heightening operational and compliance risk for finance and supply chain operations.
  • Messy, legacy data silos undermine AI effectiveness and lead to "extremely high token costs," reducing the economic viability of some AI approaches.
  • Relying solely on the most advanced model without governance may not deliver safe or cost-effective outcomes for enterprise processes.

More from Stock Markets

ASX CFO Andrew Tobin to retire as exchange completes CEO search Jul 23, 2026 Brazilian Investigation Blames Icing, De-icing Failures and Airline Practices in Deadly Voepass Crash Jul 23, 2026 Lyntris Seeks NYSE Listing, Files S-1 for IPO Under Ticker LYNX Jul 23, 2026 Pelican Acquisition II Raises $75 Million in Nasdaq IPO Jul 23, 2026 Lyntris Moves Toward U.S. IPO After Reporting Strong Six-Month Revenue Gain Jul 23, 2026