Economy July 23, 2026 02:13 PM

ECB Weighs Multiple Measures to Curb Losses as Autumn Decision Looms

Options under consideration include higher minimum reserves, tiered remuneration and fees as policymakers debate a politically sensitive fix

By Avery Klein
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

The European Central Bank is examining several policy options aimed at reducing the financial losses faced across the Eurosystem, with a decisive conversation expected in the autumn, according to four sources. Measures being considered range from raising minimum reserve requirements to reintroducing tiered deposit rates or even charging banks fees. The debate reflects tensions between using monetary policy tools to address issues with a fiscal character and the distributional consequences for commercial banks and national central banks.

ECB Weighs Multiple Measures to Curb Losses as Autumn Decision Looms
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • The ECB is considering raising minimum reserve requirements from 1% to 2%, which would save the Eurosystem about c4 billion per year - impact: banking sector, national central banks.
  • Reintroducing a tiered deposit rate could stop remunerating some excess reserves; currently banks earn 2.25% on deposits above the minimum, costing the Eurosystem nearly c50 billion annually - impact: commercial banks, liquidity markets.
  • Some proposals include scrapping reserves and charging fees instead; policymakers are debating whether monetary tools should be used to address losses that carry fiscal implications - impact: central banking, government finance.

FRANKFURT, July 23 - The European Central Bank is exploring a set of possible actions to reduce the losses now being carried by the Eurosystem, with the discussion intensifying ahead of a likely decision in the autumn, four sources said.

ECB President Christine Lagarde confirmed that governors will deliberate on raising minimum reserve requirements, a move that would require commercial banks to hold a larger share of deposits and certain short-term liabilities in unremunerated accounts with their national central banks as a buffer for potential liquidity stress.

Other options being considered include applying a tiered remuneration system in which interest would not be paid on certain tranches of banks' excess reserves, or in some proposals even charging fees on reserves, the sources added. Those alternatives aim to reduce the pay-out burden on the Eurosystem that has built up following years of stimulus.

A spokesperson for the ECB declined to comment on the discussions.


Minimum reserves under review

Commercial banks currently must keep 1% of their deposits and a portion of short-term liabilities as reserves at their central banks; those reserves are not remunerated. One option on the table is to double that requirement to 2%. Reuters calculations show that raising the minimum to 2% would save the ECB and the 21 national central banks of the Eurosystem nearly c4 billion per year.

Such a change would compel a subset of banks to obtain additional cash to meet the higher threshold, although most banks already hold reserves above 1% and therefore would be less affected.


Reintroducing tiered rates

Another preference among some policymakers is to stop remunerating parts of banks' excess reserves above the minimum. At present, banks receive a 2.25% interest rate on euros deposited above required reserves. That arrangement leaves the Eurosystem paying almost c50 billion annually on a little over c2 trillion of liquidity parked with central banks.

Reinstating a tiered rate structure would be a less disruptive option for many banks, the sources said. But it could also disadvantage the minority of institutions whose liquidity sits below the proposed 2% threshold. Those banks would receive no interest from the Eurosystem and might be incentivized to move reserves to banks already meeting or exceeding that threshold, enabling both counterparties to receive some payout while leaving the Eurosystem's interest bill unchanged, the sources cautioned.


Fees and structural alternatives

A more unconventional proposal discussed by some within the ECB would see the abolition of minimum reserve requirements altogether and the introduction of fees instead. Views differ among governors about whether adjusting remuneration or reserve rules to limit losses is appropriate, with critics arguing such moves repurpose a monetary policy tool to address an issue that has fiscal implications.

When a central bank runs losses, its capacity to distribute dividends to national governments diminishes, and in extreme cases it may need to request a capital injection from those governments. Some national central banks, such as the Bundesbank, have sought to manage these dynamics by staggering losses.


Origins of the losses

The losses stem in large part from the accumulation of central bank securities purchases conducted from 2015 to 2022, a period when the ECB purchased substantial amounts of debt to stimulate the economy and ward off deflationary pressures. Some debt bought by national central banks in highly rated jurisdictions carried low or negative yields. When the ECB raised its deposit rate to counter high inflation in 2022 and 2023, those dynamics left several national central banks sitting on sizeable losses.

Some of the securities purchased have since matured, which reduced the volume of reserves in the system and has made the question of remuneration less urgent for some governors.


Context and next steps

The debate among ECB policymakers on this sensitive topic remains open and additional proposals could emerge before a policy decision is reached in the autumn, the sources said. The discussions will weigh the distributional effects on commercial banks, the balance-sheet pressures on national central banks, and the broader question of whether reserve rules should be used to address what some participants view as a fiscal problem.

For reference, the exchange rate at the time of the reporting was $1 = 0.8792 euros.

Risks

  • Political sensitivity - changes to reserve rules or remuneration are politically charged and could provoke pushback from banks or governments - sectors affected: banking, public finance.
  • Liquidity redistribution - removing interest on reserves for banks below 2% may incentivize transfers of reserves between banks, potentially creating liquidity pressures for smaller institutions - sectors affected: commercial banking, interbank markets.
  • Fiscal strain on national central banks - persistent losses reduce the ability of central banks to pay dividends to national governments and, in extreme cases, could require capital injections - sectors affected: sovereign finances, central banking.

More from Economy

Lagarde Signals ECB Will Consider Raising Banks' Minimum Reserves Jul 23, 2026 U.S. Bonds Trail European and Asian Peers Over One and Five Years Jul 23, 2026 Treasury Yields Surge to 18-Month High as Crude Tops $90 on Shipping Attacks Jul 23, 2026 Israeli Banks to End Correspondent Links with Palestinian Lenders, Raising Economic Alarm Jul 23, 2026 Canada pledges firm response as U.S. tariff threat looms Jul 23, 2026