Commodities September 14, 2026 04:45 PM

Interior Secretary Says U.S. Oil Export Ban Would Not Lower Consumer Energy Costs

Doug Burgum warns export restrictions could prompt retaliation and worsen prices in import-dependent states as administration weighs refining options

By Caleb Monroe
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told reporters at a G20 energy meeting in Houston that banning U.S. oil or fuel exports is unlikely to reduce prices for consumers. He cautioned that export restrictions could trigger retaliatory actions from other countries and highlighted California's reliance on imports and refinery closures as factors already driving higher local fuel costs. The administration is exploring other tools, including use of the Defense Production Act to boost refining capacity, ahead of midterm elections in November.

Interior Secretary Says U.S. Oil Export Ban Would Not Lower Consumer Energy Costs
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said an export ban on U.S. oil or fuels would likely not lower consumer energy prices.
  • Burgum warned export restrictions could prompt retaliatory actions by other countries, potentially reducing imports to states like California.
  • The White House is considering using the Defense Production Act to expand U.S. refining capacity as diesel and gasoline prices rise ahead of the November midterm elections.

U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said on Monday that imposing a ban on exports of American crude or refined fuels would probably not lower energy prices for U.S. consumers, a position he stated while speaking at a G20 meeting on energy in Houston.

Burgum, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, said policymakers would consider an export ban only if there were clear evidence it would bring down prices. "We would consider an export ban if we thought that actually might lower prices, but that’s not the case," he told reporters.

He warned that curtailing exports of oil, gasoline or diesel could provoke retaliatory measures from trading partners, with consequences that could harm consumers in parts of the country that rely on imports for some of their supply. "We stop exporting product, and then somebody says, 'We’re not going to export to California,'" Burgum said, describing a potential chain reaction that could reduce available supply in certain regions.

Burgum also pointed to structural factors that have already contributed to high pump prices in some states. He noted that California has closed several oil refineries over time and that those closures have, over the long term, contributed to higher local fuel costs. "California already (has) the highest prices in the country for gas and diesel anyway, because of their policies, we wouldn’t want ... to exacerbate that," he said.

The comments come as the administration confronts limited options to bring down costs for diesel, oil and gasoline ahead of the midterm elections in November, which will determine control of Congress. Diesel recently hit a record above $6 a gallon in the U.S., with even higher prices in California, heightening pressure on policymakers to act.

Among the measures being discussed at the White House is the possible use of the Cold War-era Defense Production Act to expand U.S. refining capacity, a step that would aim to increase domestic processing of crude to help alleviate supply pressures.

In summary, Burgum argued that an export ban is unlikely to be an effective tool for lowering consumer prices and could invite retaliatory supply actions that worsen conditions in import-dependent states. The administration is instead weighing other policy options, including measures to grow refining capacity, while navigating the political calendar ahead of November's midterm elections.


Source note: Remarks made by the Interior Secretary at a G20 energy meeting in Houston were used as the basis for this account.

Risks

  • Retaliatory trade actions could cut off or reduce imported fuel supplies to regions that depend on external sources, affecting regional fuel availability and prices - impacts energy and transport sectors.
  • Long-term refinery closures, such as those in California, have already contributed to higher local fuel prices and could limit the effectiveness of supply-side interventions - impacts refining and consumer sectors.
  • Political constraints and the approach to policy ahead of the midterm elections may limit quick or broad-based federal responses to elevated diesel and gasoline prices - impacts markets and consumer spending.

More from Commodities

Wheat Prices Slip as Hopes Grow for Eased Black Sea Tensions Sep 14, 2026 Northwest European gasoline refining margins climb to $52 per barrel after active barge trading Sep 14, 2026 EPA Finalizes Repeal of Biden-Era Power Plant Emission Limits at G20 Energy Meeting Sep 14, 2026 Kremlin Praises Trump Appeal for Ukraine to Halt Strikes on Diesel Facilities Sep 14, 2026 Deadly Strikes in Southern Lebanon Kill Dozens as Tensions Rise Sep 14, 2026