Economy May 13, 2026 11:19 AM

2nd Circuit Upholds New York Fed Decision to Cut Off Puerto Rican Bank from Master Account

Appeals court says regional Fed banks have discretion over access to the central bank’s payment system; no evidence of discrimination found

By Caleb Monroe

A federal appeals court in Manhattan unanimously rejected an appeal by Banco San Juan Internacional (BSJI) after the New York Federal Reserve moved to close the lender’s master account amid concerns about compliance with U.S. sanctions and anti-money-laundering rules. The 3-0 decision affirmed that regional Reserve Banks have discretion to grant or deny access to the Fed’s electronic payment system and found no proof the bank was targeted because of ownership ties to Venezuela.

2nd Circuit Upholds New York Fed Decision to Cut Off Puerto Rican Bank from Master Account

Key Points

  • 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued a 3-0 decision rejecting Banco San Juan Internacional’s claim to a statutory right to a Fed "master account".
  • The New York Fed moved to close BSJI’s 11-year-old account over concerns about compliance with U.S. sanctions and anti-money-laundering rules; the appeals court found no evidence of discriminatory animus tied to Venezuelan ownership.
  • The decision underscores regional Federal Reserve Banks’ discretion to grant or deny access to the Fed’s payment system, an authority framed by the court as part of their role in promoting financial stability.

NEW YORK - On May 13, a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued a unanimous ruling against a Puerto Rican lender that challenged the New York Federal Reserve’s decision to terminate its access to the U.S. central banking system.

The appeals court overturned Banco San Juan Internacional’s claim that the Federal Reserve Act conferred a right to a so-called "master account," the credential that allows banks to use the Fed’s electronic payment system. The court’s 3-0 decision rejected BSJI’s argument that the statute guaranteed such access.

BSJI had filed suit in 2023 after being informed the bank’s master account, which had been maintained for 11 years, would be closed. The New York Fed cited concerns that BSJI was not complying with U.S. sanctions and anti-money-laundering rules.

The bank argued its termination was part of a broader campaign to de-bank certain business models, saying the action echoed other moves that have affected companies with links to cryptocurrency and cannabis. The appeal also raised an allegation that the bank was cut off because it was owned by a Venezuelan national.

Circuit Judge Denny Chin, writing for the panel, countered those claims by emphasizing the discretion regional Federal Reserve Banks possess in deciding who may access the payments system. He framed that discretion as part of the Reserve Banks’ responsibility to promote financial stability.

"To perform that function, Congress gave Reserve Banks a toolkit of scalpels and a hatchet," Chin wrote. "Against member banks, Reserve Banks have a myriad of precise and targeted powers - including supervision, investigation, and enforcement authority - through which they can surgically manage risk. Against nonmember banks, their primary power is the blunt instrument of allowing or disallowing access to the Fed’s payment system."

The appeals court also found no supporting evidence of "discriminatory animus" behind BSJI’s removal from the Fed’s payment network, undermining the bank’s claim that its ownership ties to Venezuela motivated the decision.

In its filings, BSJI cited a 2019 news report that detailed a prior effort by the New York Fed to curb activities in Puerto Rico’s offshore banking sector in the context of sanctions targeting the Venezuelan government. The appeal further noted the historical closeness between Puerto Rico’s banking industry and Venezuela.

The case record also references developments concerning Venezuela’s leadership, noting that the individual identified in those reports is now in a Brooklyn jail awaiting trial on drug trafficking charges and has pleaded not guilty.


Context and implications

The ruling affirms the legal principle that regional Reserve Banks retain substantial latitude in controlling access to central banking services, particularly for nonmember institutions, and clarifies the limits of statutory claims seeking guaranteed master accounts.

Risks

  • Uncertainty for banks with close ties to jurisdictions or clients under U.S. sanctions, affecting compliance-heavy sectors such as international banking and correspondent services.
  • Potential de-risking impacts on niche financial models and businesses linked to cryptocurrency or cannabis, which could face reduced access to payment infrastructure if institutions are viewed as higher compliance risks.

More from Economy

Majority of U.S. Adults Say Their Finances Are Stable as Inflation and Job Fears Linger May 13, 2026 Boston Fed's Collins Says Further Rate Hikes Could Be Required if Inflation Persists May 13, 2026 Majority of Americans Say Personal Finances Are Stable as Job Concerns Rise, Fed Survey Finds May 13, 2026 Boston Fed's Collins: Further Rate Increases Possible if Inflation Persists May 13, 2026 Starmer’s State Opening Overshadowed by Looming Leadership Challenge May 13, 2026