Economy June 9, 2026 04:18 PM

Judge Gives Preliminary Okay to $38 Billion Visa-Mastercard Deal With Merchants

Brooklyn federal judge finds revised settlement fair as trade groups press objections over merchant costs

By Ajmal Hussain
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A federal judge in Brooklyn has granted preliminary approval to a revised $38 billion settlement between Visa, Mastercard and merchants who alleged the card networks and banks charged excessive fees for processing card payments. The ruling follows a prior rejection of a smaller $30 billion agreement and comes amid opposition from several merchant trade groups that say the deal could force businesses to accept costly rewards cards or forgo sales.

Judge Gives Preliminary Okay to $38 Billion Visa-Mastercard Deal With Merchants
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan granted preliminary approval to a revised $38 billion settlement between Visa, Mastercard and merchants alleging excessive swipe fees.
  • The agreement is meant to resolve litigation that began in 2005; a prior $30 billion settlement had been rejected by a different judge as insufficient.
  • Major merchant trade groups including the National Retail Federation, the Merchants Payments Coalition and the National Association of Convenience Stores oppose the revised settlement, saying it forces merchants to either pay high fees to accept dominant rewards cards or risk lost revenue.

A U.S. federal judge on Tuesday granted preliminary approval to a revised $38 billion settlement reached between Visa and Mastercard and a group of merchants who accused the card networks and banks of charging excessive fees for credit card transactions.

U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan, sitting in Brooklyn, New York, concluded that the proposed settlement met the standards of being fair, reasonable, and adequate at this stage of court review. The agreement, announced in November, is intended to resolve litigation that traces back to 2005, when merchants first brought claims alleging that Visa, Mastercard and various banks conspired in ways that violated U.S. antitrust laws through the collection of so-called swipe fees.

The decision to grant preliminary approval follows an earlier judicial rebuff of a proposed $30 billion settlement, which a different judge had deemed insufficient. That prior rejection occurred nearly two years before the revised $38 billion proposal now under preliminary review.

Despite the court's initial endorsement, the revised settlement has attracted criticism from several merchant trade organizations. The National Retail Federation, the Merchants Payments Coalition and the National Association of Convenience Stores are among the groups that have publicly opposed the terms. Those organizations argue the agreement would put merchants in a difficult position: either pay what they characterize as excessive fees to continue accepting popular rewards cards that have a dominant market presence, or refuse those cards and risk losing sales and revenue.

The settlement is structured to resolve long-running litigation over interchange or swipe fees, but the preliminary nature of the approval signals further procedural steps remain before any final resolution. The court's finding of fairness and adequacy at this stage permits notice and other procedural requirements to move forward under the settlement framework.


Context and next steps

  • The settlement addresses claims dating to 2005 concerning alleged antitrust conduct by card networks and banks in relation to swipe fees.
  • A previous $30 billion proposal was rejected by a different judge as inadequate nearly two years earlier.
  • Several major merchant trade groups oppose the revised agreement, citing potential negative impacts on merchants' acceptance choices and revenues.

Risks

  • Opposition from merchant trade groups could complicate or delay final court approval - this affects the retail and payments sectors.
  • The settlement's terms may pressure merchants to accept expensive rewards cards, potentially increasing costs for retailers and shaping merchant payment acceptance strategies.
  • Earlier judicial rejection of a $30 billion settlement demonstrates continued judicial scrutiny and raises uncertainty about whether the revised deal will withstand further court review.

More from Economy

Global Markets Face Downward Pressure Amid Tech Sell-Off and Geopolitical Tension Jun 9, 2026 Federal Reserve Schedules Release of Annual Large Bank Stress Test Results Jun 9, 2026 Federal Reserve to Publish Annual Bank Stress Test Results on June 24 Jun 9, 2026 Frigorifico Concepcion Engages Advisers to Assess Capital Structure After Missed Loan Payment Jun 9, 2026 Treasury Yields Retreat Ahead of Key U.S. Inflation Report Jun 9, 2026