Economy June 22, 2026 04:05 AM

ECB study finds limited impact of AI on U.S. jobs and wages so far

Analysis shows labour reallocation away from high AI-substitution roles; income effects unchanged to date

By Maya Rios
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A European Central Bank study published June 22 reports that the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence in the United States has not produced a large aggregate decline in employment or wages through 2025. The ECB's Economic Bulletin finds that while some occupations face high substitution risk - and have seen employment falls - overall labour has shifted toward lower-risk roles, and wage growth has not been significantly affected since 2019. The study warns that effects could evolve as AI tools become more capable.

ECB study finds limited impact of AI on U.S. jobs and wages so far
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • The ECB reports limited aggregate impacts of AI on U.S. employment and wages through 2025, despite heavy corporate AI investment.
  • Between 2019 and 2025, high-risk jobs grew about 15 percentage points less than low-risk jobs; high-risk roles fell more than 4% on average while low-risk roles rose 13%.
  • Labour reallocation has increased the share of low-risk jobs from 23% to 25% and reduced the share of high-risk jobs from 35% to 33%; sectors such as education and skilled trades showed resilience while occupations like economic analysis and graphic design were more exposed.

FRANKFURT, June 22 - A surge in corporate investment in artificial intelligence has raised concerns that machines could replace many workers, depressing employment and amplifying income inequality. Yet a study by the European Central Bank, published in its Economic Bulletin on Monday, finds that the aggregate effects on U.S. employment and wages have been limited so far.

The ECB's analysis notes that firms have indeed increased AI spending in recent years, but the U.S. labour market appears to have been adjusting for some time. Jobs judged to be most exposed to substitution by AI have been partly reallocated to other parts of the economy, producing a gradual reshaping of work patterns rather than a broad collapse in employment.

Quantitatively, the ECB highlights a sizeable divergence in growth between jobs with differing substitution risk. "All else being equal, between 2019 and 2025 jobs with a high substitution risk grew by around 15 percentage points less than jobs with a low substitution risk," the study said.

Employment in occupations identified as having a high risk of AI substitution, such as economists or graphic designers, fell on average by more than 4% between 2019 and 2025. By contrast, employment in occupations with a low risk of substitution, including electricians and high school teachers, rose by 13% over the same period.

The relative composition of U.S. employment changed as a result. The share of low-risk jobs in total employment increased from 23% to 25%, while the share of high-risk jobs decreased from 35% to 33%.

On incomes, the ECB found no measurable overall effect to date. "AI substitution risk has had no significant impact on wage growth since 2019," the institution said, while also cautioning that the situation could change. "Over time, as the labour market continues to adjust and AI tools become more generative, income effects may be more pronounced."

The study also points to heterogeneous impacts within sectors and workforce groups. Certain workers - notably junior staff in occupations that are highly exposed to AI - appear more vulnerable to displacement. Nevertheless, at the aggregate level through 2025, the data do not show a broad-based decline in employment or wages attributable to AI adoption.

Overall, the ECB frames the U.S. experience as one of gradual reallocation: roles with higher substitution risk have seen weaker growth or modest declines, while lower-risk roles expanded, leaving aggregate employment and wage trends largely unchanged so far. The study leaves open the possibility that further advances in generative AI and continuing labour-market adjustments could amplify distributional or income effects in the future.

Risks

  • Potential for larger income effects over time as AI tools become more generative - could affect wage growth and household incomes across sectors.
  • Concentrated vulnerability among junior staff and workers in highly exposed occupations - risk concentrated in specific roles and firms within susceptible sectors.
  • Possibility that continued adoption of AI could accelerate reallocation and create transitional unemployment or skill mismatch pressures in affected markets.

More from Economy

Keir Starmer to Step Down as UK Prime Minister and Labour Leader Jun 22, 2026 Citigroup and UBS Raise Taiwan 2026 Growth Forecasts to 9.9% Jun 22, 2026 AI sector and Iran diplomacy steer markets as futures recover Jun 22, 2026 Romanian PM-designate Seeks Confidence Vote Amid Fragmented Support Jun 22, 2026 Any Forward Step Counts as Hormuz Tensions Rattle Markets Jun 22, 2026