Commodities July 9, 2026 06:48 PM

House to Consider Legislation to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent Next Week

Vote follows strong committee backing and a prior unanimous Senate approval; states would be permitted to opt out

By Sofia Navarro
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

The U.S. House of Representatives will vote next week on a bill to make daylight saving time permanent, a measure that previously cleared the House Energy and Commerce Committee by 48-1 and that the Senate unanimously approved in March 2022 but which the House did not take up at the time. The proposal would allow states to opt out and has drawn both support and opposition on grounds ranging from public safety and tourism to concerns about dark winter mornings for schoolchildren.

House to Consider Legislation to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent Next Week
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • House to vote next week on a bill to make daylight saving time permanent; a notice was posted on Thursday.
  • The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the Sunshine Protection Act in May by a 48-1 vote; the Senate had voted unanimously in March 2022 on a similar measure.
  • The proposal would let states opt out; supporters cite reduced sleep disruption, fewer workplace injuries and crashes, and potential boosts to tourism and winter economic activity.

WASHINGTON, July 9 - The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote next week on legislation that would establish daylight saving time year-round, according to a notice released on Thursday.


The measure, often referred to as the Sunshine Protection Act, previously won near-unanimous support in the House Energy and Commerce Committee in May, clearing the panel by a 48-1 margin. The U.S. Senate had voted unanimously in March 2022 to move to permanent daylight saving time, but the House did not take up that version of the bill at the time amid recorded opposition.

The text of the proposal the House will consider next week includes a provision allowing individual states to opt out of year-round daylight saving time, preserving a degree of state-level choice over clock settings.

Daylight saving time - advancing clocks by one hour during the spring and summer months - has been observed across nearly the entire United States since the 1960s. Proponents of making the practice permanent point to a range of claimed effects, arguing the twice-yearly clock changes cause sleep disruptions and contribute to higher rates of workplace injuries and traffic crashes. Supporters also contend that extended evening daylight in winter months could stimulate additional economic activity.

President Donald Trump has publicly supported an end to the biannual clock changes. In May he said it was "time that people can stop worrying about the 'Clock,' not to mention all of the work and money that is spent on this ridiculous, twice yearly production."

If the House approves the bill, it would return to the Senate for consideration. The measure faces continued opposition from some lawmakers, including Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who has warned that year-round daylight saving time would push winter sunrises to very late hours and could require children in many parts of the country to travel to school in darkness.

Representative Vern Buchanan, a Republican from Florida who has introduced the legislative effort repeatedly since 2018, refiled the bill this year. The proposal has particular resonance in his home state, where supporters highlight benefits such as additional evening hours for recreational activities on golf courses and sports fields.

Representative Frank Pallone, a Democrat from New Jersey, has voiced support as well, saying permanent daylight saving time is "better for safety and will boost New Jersey’s tourism industry. Let’s stop changing the clocks twice a year."

The United States has experimented with year-round daylight saving time in the past. It was used during World War Two and briefly enacted again in 1974 with an energy-saving rationale, but the 1974 initiative proved unpopular and Congress repealed it later that year.


As the House prepares to vote, the debate remains framed by competing concerns over safety, daily schedules for families and schools, recreational and tourism benefits, and regional differences in sunrise and sunset timing.

Risks

  • Opposition from some lawmakers - notably Senator Tom Cotton - who argue permanent daylight saving time could result in very late winter sunrises and require children in parts of the country to travel to school in darkness, raising safety and scheduling concerns.
  • Political uncertainty - even if the House passes the bill, the Senate would need to consider it again, leaving its ultimate fate unresolved.

More from Commodities

Turkey, Iraq Near Agreement to Keep Crude Pipeline Flowing for 12 Months Jul 9, 2026 ARA jet fuel and kerosene stocks decline as exports slow and imports halt Jul 9, 2026 HSBC Sees Gold Set to Rebound as Fiscal and Geopolitical Strains Persist Jul 9, 2026 Qatar Suspends Rapid LNG Output Increase After Tanker Assault Near Hormuz Jul 9, 2026 Bernstein Raises 2026 Gold Targets, Cites Central Bank Demand and Muted Fed Path Jul 9, 2026