Stock Markets April 30, 2026 03:01 PM

Woodside Faces Resistance Selling Louisiana LNG Volumes as Liquefaction Fees Outpace U.S. Market

Higher-than-market liquefaction fees delay long-term contracts for Woodside’s Louisiana export project despite strong customer interest

By Ajmal Hussain
Woodside Faces Resistance Selling Louisiana LNG Volumes as Liquefaction Fees Outpace U.S. Market

Woodside Energy has secured only one long-term sale for its Louisiana LNG project after encountering pushback from buyers over liquefaction fees priced above prevailing U.S. levels. The Australian producer has offered contract terms attractive in duration but has had to retreat on pricing amid comparisons with other U.S. suppliers. The project’s first phase is budgeted at roughly $17.5 billion and will result in a three-train facility with 16.5 mtpa capacity, of which Woodside will market just over 8 mtpa after selling down half the plant.

Key Points

  • Woodside has signed one long-term LNG sale for its Louisiana project - a deal with Uniper for up to 2 mtpa, roughly 25% of Woodside’s share of the plant output.
  • Buyers are resisting Woodside’s initially proposed liquefaction fees above $2.80 per mmBtu, which compare unfavorably with broader U.S. market rates around $2.40 to $2.50 per mmBtu and rival fees such as Cheniere’s ~ $2.60 and Venture Global’s ~ $2.30.
  • The project’s first phase carries an estimated cost of about $17.5 billion, will include three processing trains totalling 16.5 mtpa capacity, and, after Woodside sold 50% of the plant, leaves Woodside with just over 8 mtpa to market.

Woodside Energy is encountering headwinds in marketing long-term volumes from its planned Louisiana liquefied natural gas export facility as buyers balk at liquefaction fees that are reportedly above typical U.S. rates, two people with knowledge of the discussions said.

To date the Australian energy firm has publicly announced a single long-term sales and purchase agreement for the project - a deal with Germany’s Uniper covering up to 2 million metric tons per year, which the parties describe as roughly 25% of Woodside’s share of the plant’s output.

Liquefaction fees are additional charges levied by producers on top of the base energy price to convert natural gas into a liquid form suitable for transport. Those fees have been rising across the market amid labor shortages, higher construction costs, and elevated demand that market participants attribute in part to the ongoing Iran conflict. Still, the resistance Woodside is sensing from potential buyers could indicate there is an effective ceiling on what customers will accept for U.S. liquefaction services.

"The problem Woodside has is the price of its liquefaction fees, which are above what others in the U.S. are charging," one of the sources said. That source reported Woodside initially sought fees above $2.80 per million British thermal units, compared with broader U.S. market rates near $2.40 to $2.50 per mmBtu.

For comparison, the source said, Cheniere Energy - the largest U.S. producer - charges slightly higher fees at around $2.60 per mmBtu, while Venture Global is among the lowest at roughly $2.30 per mmBtu.

A second person familiar with pricing talks said that Woodside’s commercial package carried some attractive elements beyond headline fee levels, notably contract duration, but that price remained the central sticking point. "Woodside is offering 10-year contracts, which are attractive in terms of duration, but the sticking point has been the price," the source said. "They wanted $2.80 per mmBtu but are now offering it at $2.60."

Woodside declined to comment to third parties. On the company’s recent earnings call, however, CEO Liz Westcott said customer interest remained strong and expressed comfort with project progress in Louisiana. "Many customers are seeing the benefit of being geographically diversified, and we are very comfortable with how the process is going in Louisiana LNG," Westcott said. "We continue to be well priced in the market. We were in the next wave of LNG projects, and we are one of the lower-cost LNG suppliers," she added.

The Louisiana LNG venture is a central plank of Woodside’s push into North America, reflecting a strategic bet on continued global demand for gas and expectations of U.S. policy environments that are favorable to fossil fuel projects. Phase 1 of the facility is projected to cost about $17.5 billion.

Woodside has sold a 40% stake in the project to U.S. investment firm Stonepeak, and an additional 10% to U.S.-based energy infrastructure firm Williams (WMB.N). The first phase foresees building a three-train processing facility with total capacity of 16.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa). Because Woodside has sold down half of the plant, it will have just over 8 mtpa of LNG to place with long-term buyers.

Under the supply arrangement with Uniper, the German company will take 1 mtpa of LNG from the Louisiana facility for 13 years, with the option to source up to an additional 1 mtpa from Woodside’s global portfolio. Deliveries from Louisiana LNG are scheduled to begin in 2030, when the project is slated for commissioning.


While Woodside highlights customer interest and competitive positioning on costs, the company’s experience so far illustrates how fee structure and price sensitivity remain central to securing long-dated contracts in the U.S. LNG market. Buyers appear willing to weigh contract duration and supply diversification against the immediate headline costs of liquefaction, creating a negotiating dynamic in which fee levels can determine how quickly a new project sells down its marketed volumes.

For Woodside, finding price points that both preserve project economics and meet buyer expectations will be critical to filling the remainder of its marketed 8 mtpa ahead of the 2030 commissioning timeline.

Risks

  • Liquidity risk in securing long-term buyers if liquefaction fees remain above prevailing U.S. market levels - this affects project revenue certainty and the energy sector.
  • Cost pressures - rising construction costs and labor shortages have pushed liquefaction fees higher, creating uncertainty for project pricing and financing in the infrastructure and energy sectors.
  • Market-price ceiling - buyer resistance could establish a practical ceiling on acceptable U.S. liquefaction fees, complicating commercial negotiations for exporters and influencing market dynamics in LNG trading.

More from Stock Markets

Brockman Reveals Near-$30 Billion OpenAI Stake and Financial Links to Altman During Musk Trial May 4, 2026 California Launches Probe into Federal Deal That Scrapped Central Coast Offshore Wind Project May 4, 2026 Pilots Union Praises Kirby’s Merger Vision, Stops Short of Endorsing Deal May 4, 2026 Embraer Sees Follow-On Middle East Defense Sales After UAE C-390 Agreement May 4, 2026 Intel hires long-serving Qualcomm executive to oversee PCs and physical AI unit May 4, 2026