Stock Markets May 13, 2026 10:46 AM

Skechers Sweetens Settlement Bid in Challenge to 3G Buyout

Company boosts offer to $65 a share as appraisal-arbitrage investors press Delaware litigation over $9.4 billion deal

By Derek Hwang

Skechers raised a settlement proposal in April to $65 per share to try to resolve a lawsuit from hedge funds and other investors contesting 3G Capital's $9.4 billion acquisition. The renewed offer tops a prior $64-per-share proposal and comes as investment firms pursuing appraisal arbitrage seek a higher valuation in Delaware courts. The litigation, driven by claims the deal was approved amid market turmoil after tariff announcements, remains in early stages.

Skechers Sweetens Settlement Bid in Challenge to 3G Buyout

Key Points

  • Skechers raised its settlement offer in April to $65 per share, $2 above the September acquisition price, aiming to resolve a suit over the $9.4 billion 3G Capital buyout.
  • Investment firms pursuing the case are using an appraisal arbitrage strategy - buying shares after the deal announcement and seeking a higher valuation through Delaware courts; original investors involved hold about $1.3 billion in shares.
  • The dispute centers on claims that the deal was approved amid market turmoil following tariff announcements on April 2, 2025, which investors say impacted Skechers given its manufacturing footprint in China and Vietnam - sectors tied to apparel and global trade.

Skechers USA Inc. increased its settlement proposal in April to address a lawsuit brought by hedge funds and other investors contesting the company's $9.4 billion acquisition by 3G Capital. The revised offer would value the shares at $65 each, which the company presented as a settlement figure that is $2 higher than the September acquisition price.

That April bid surpassed an earlier $64-per-share proposal Skechers made during settlement discussions last year, talks that did not result in a resolution. According to those involved in the matter, the newer offer represents Skechers' latest effort to bring the dispute to a close without further litigation.

The plaintiffs in the case have used an appraisal arbitrage approach - acquiring stock after the deal was announced and asking Delaware courts to determine a larger per-share valuation. The group of original investors at the center of the litigation holds about $1.3 billion worth of Skechers shares, a stake that positions the matter to be among the largest appraisal cases to proceed in Delaware.

At present the litigation is at an early procedural stage and no trial date has been set. Investors challenging the buyout contend that founder Robert Greenberg and his son approved a price that was unfair, pointing to market disruption that followed President Donald Trump’s tariff announcements on April 2, 2025. Those tariff measures are said to have affected Skechers’ share price because the company manufactures a substantial portion of its footwear in China and Vietnam.

Skechers' raised offer and the appraisal-arbitrage strategy pursued by opponents of the deal frame the current legal contest as one that hinges on valuation questions and market conditions at the time of the transaction. With significant stakes involved and the case still in its early phases, both sides appear to be positioning for a possible protracted review in Delaware courts unless a settlement is reached.


Contextual note: The information in this article is limited to the details provided about the raised settlement offer, the appraisal-arbitrage strategy used by investors, the size of the investor stake, and the claim that tariff announcements on April 2, 2025, affected Skechers' stock. No trial date has been set.

Risks

  • Uncertainty in litigation timing and outcome - the case is in early stages with no trial date set, potentially prolonging legal and valuation uncertainty for shareholders and acquirers; this affects legal and financial sectors.
  • Market sensitivity from trade policy - the plaintiffs point to tariff announcements on April 2, 2025, as contributing to share price disruption; this highlights exposure in consumer goods and manufacturing sectors tied to China and Vietnam.
  • Potential for a larger valuation determination - appraisal-arbitrage proceedings could lead Delaware courts to set a per-share price different from the acquisition price, creating financial risk for both sellers and buyers involved in M&A transactions.

More from Stock Markets

S&P Raises Sandisk Rating After Debt Paydown, Cites Strong Cash Position and Buyback Capacity May 13, 2026 Shutterstock Agrees to $35 Million Settlement Over Alleged Subscription Disclosure Failings May 13, 2026 Oslo markets close modestly higher as healthcare, pharma and utilities lead gains May 13, 2026 Ledger Suspends U.S. IPO Plans Citing Challenging Market Environment May 13, 2026 Tel Aviv Stocks Close Lower as TA 35 Drops 0.84% May 13, 2026