Stock Markets June 8, 2026 10:09 PM

U.S. Senators Push Commerce Unit to Close Chipmaking Loophole for Chinese Firms’ Overseas Arms

Bipartisan letter asks Bureau of Industry and Security to explicitly block contract foundries from fabricating advanced chips for subsidiaries of Chinese companies

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
TSM NVDA

Two U.S. senators have urged the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to issue clear guidance preventing contract semiconductor manufacturers from producing advanced AI chips for overseas subsidiaries of Chinese firms. The appeal follows a recent administration action to close a possible channel that could have allowed advanced chip exports to Chinese company affiliates located outside China, and highlights concerns that front companies could circumvent export controls by ordering custom chips through third-party foundries.

U.S. Senators Push Commerce Unit to Close Chipmaking Loophole for Chinese Firms’ Overseas Arms
TSM NVDA
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Two bipartisan U.S. senators urged BIS to close a potential loophole that could allow contract foundries to fabricate advanced chips for overseas subsidiaries of Chinese firms.
  • BIS has clarified that sales to subsidiaries in third countries, such as Malaysia, require a license, but experts say that guidance may not address orders placed through front companies.
  • Sectors affected include semiconductor manufacturing, export-control compliance, and firms supplying advanced AI processors.

Two senators from opposite sides of the aisle have asked the Commerce Department to tighten export-control guidance to prevent a potential route for advanced chip technology to reach Chinese companies through their foreign subsidiaries.

The lawmakers, Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) and Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), wrote on Monday to Jeffrey Kessler, the head of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), urging the agency to address explicitly the scenario in which subsidiaries or affiliates of Chinese firms place orders for custom chips with contract manufacturers such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.

The request follows a separate administration action last week that moved to block what officials saw as a possible loophole that might have allowed advanced processors - including those produced by Nvidia - to be exported to units of Chinese companies located outside mainland China. That possible gap stems in part from last year’s announcement that the administration would not enforce rules that had been put in place by the previous administration governing global access to U.S. chips.

BIS has since clarified that shipments of chips to subsidiaries of Chinese companies in third countries - examples cited include jurisdictions such as Malaysia - require a license. But some experts have said the clarification does not go far enough to close every avenue by which advanced U.S.-origin technology could be diverted.

Chris McGuire, a former State Department official referenced in recent commentary, warned that guidance still left unresolved the risk that front companies tied to Chinese firms could request bespoke chips be fabricated by contract foundries. That concern underlies the senators’ letter to Kessler.

"Should this gap remain unaddressed, it would substantially undermine every other restriction the United States has imposed on the (China’s) access to advanced computing capability," the senators wrote. "Export controls that can be circumvented through fabrication orders placed at the world’s most advanced foundry offer no meaningful protection to American national security or to the competitiveness of United States industry."

The senators singled out the need for BIS to tackle directly the question of subsidiaries of Chinese firms ordering custom chips from contract manufacturers. They warned that if the agency does not close the gap, existing restrictions could be effectively circumvented.

Requests for comment by BIS and by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. were not immediately answered.

Risks

  • If unaddressed, the senators warn the loophole could undermine U.S. export controls on advanced computing - impacting national security-related policy and semiconductor trade.
  • Guidance that does not explicitly prohibit custom fabrication orders by subsidiaries or front companies may leave room for circumvention - a risk to enforcement and to companies subject to licensing.
  • Potential regulatory tightening could introduce uncertainty for global semiconductor supply chains and for firms that rely on contract foundries for advanced chips.

More from Stock Markets

Bain Capital Joins Bidders for oOh!media, Fueling Three-Way Auction Jun 8, 2026 Vietnam Orders Airlines to Speed Up U.S. Equipment Deals as Trade Scrutiny Intensifies Jun 8, 2026 Asian Markets Tick Up as Chip Stocks Rebound and Middle East Tensions Ease Jun 8, 2026 Bain Capital submits indicative takeover proposal for oOh!Media; shares jump Jun 8, 2026 Databricks in advanced talks for new funding round valuing company at up to $175 billion Jun 8, 2026