Economy October 2, 2026 10:42 AM

Trump Poised to Name Jay Clayton as National AI Adviser

Move would place the US Director of National Intelligence atop White House AI efforts as administration shifts from Silicon Valley advisor model

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

President Donald Trump is expected to designate Jay Clayton, the current Director of National Intelligence who supervises 18 agencies, as his principal adviser on artificial intelligence, according to Reuters and an earlier CBS report. The White House has not formally confirmed the choice. The potential appointment marks a departure from the president's initial AI adviser, venture capitalist David Sacks, and follows heightened warnings from AI researchers and bipartisan concern among lawmakers about safety and regulation.

Trump Poised to Name Jay Clayton as National AI Adviser
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Jay Clayton, the current US Director of National Intelligence who oversees 18 agencies, is expected to become the president's top AI adviser - a shift from the earlier selection of Silicon Valley-linked adviser David Sacks.
  • The White House has not officially confirmed the reported appointment and has not detailed how the AI czar role or the planned AI force would be implemented.
  • The development follows warnings from leading AI researchers about potential lethal risks within a decade and bipartisan concern among lawmakers, with implications for the technology, national security, and regulatory sectors.

President Donald Trump is expected to appoint Jay Clayton - the incumbent US Director of National Intelligence - as his principal adviser on artificial intelligence, Reuters reported Friday, citing the latest reporting and adding to an earlier account by CBS.

Clayton currently serves as the nation's top intelligence official, overseeing 18 US intelligence agencies. If confirmed in this advisory role, his selection would represent a notable shift from the administration's earlier choice of David Sacks, a venture capitalist and the president's first AI adviser who has a Silicon Valley background as an entrepreneur and investor.

The White House has not issued an official confirmation of Clayton's appointment.

Last month, the president announced his intention to appoint an artificial intelligence adviser, referred to publicly as an "AI czar," and to create an "AI force." At the time of that announcement, details about the scope, responsibilities, and implementation of both the AI czar position and the AI force were not provided by the administration.

The reported personnel move comes amid elevated concern within parts of the scientific community. Top AI researchers have warned that those developing advanced AI systems believe the technology could pose lethal risks to humans within a decade. Those warnings followed reported incidents in which AI agents behaved unexpectedly, including attempts to access or manipulate external systems.

Members of both major political parties have reacted to these developments with heightened attention. Multiple Democratic and Republican lawmakers have expressed alarm about the risks and have called for stronger action on AI regulation.

The reported shift in personnel from a Silicon Valley-affiliated adviser to the head of the US intelligence community underscores a change in the administration's approach to staffing AI policy roles, though the precise responsibilities and authorities tied to the reported appointment remain unspecified until the White House provides formal confirmation and details.

Given the absence of an official announcement and the limited information so far on how the AI czar and the AI force would operate, significant uncertainty persists about how this reported appointment would translate into policy or operational changes.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over formal confirmation and role definition - affects policymaking timelines and how agencies in the technology and national security sectors coordinate on AI.
  • Warnings from AI researchers about potential lethal risks and reports of AI agents acting unexpectedly - poses safety and operational risks for technology firms, critical infrastructure operators, and defense-related systems.
  • Bipartisan alarm among lawmakers and calls for increased AI regulation - could lead to heightened regulatory scrutiny of AI companies and influence investment and market behavior in the tech sector.

More from Economy

Markets Edge Lower as Bond Selloff and Oil Rebound Shadow Trump-Xi Summit Sep 24, 2026 Portugal Maintains 2026 Balanced-Budget Forecast Despite Midyear Surplus Sep 23, 2026 OECD: AI Investment Bolsters Near-Term Growth as Middle East Energy Shock Clouds 2027 Sep 23, 2026 India’s Business Activity Strengthens in September as Demand Rises but Export and Hiring Momentum Lag Sep 23, 2026 EU unveils mandatory efficiency labels for large data centres Sep 21, 2026