Stock Markets February 12, 2026 06:48 AM

Restaurant Brands Sees Q4 Comparable Sales Beat as Value Offers Lift Traffic

Burger King and Tim Hortons drive resilience in same-store sales while McDonald’s posts stronger-than-expected comps

By Avery Klein MCD
Restaurant Brands Sees Q4 Comparable Sales Beat as Value Offers Lift Traffic
MCD

Restaurant Brands International reported fourth-quarter comparable sales above analyst estimates, supported by steady customer traffic at its Burger King and Tim Hortons chains. The company’s U.S.-listed shares rose about 2% in premarket trading. McDonald’s likewise exceeded expectations for global comparable sales and profit, reporting a 3.1% same-store sales increase versus estimates of 2.8%, according to LSEG.

Key Points

  • Restaurant Brands’ Q4 comparable sales beat estimates, fueled by resilient traffic at Burger King and Tim Hortons.
  • Value-focused promotions, including Burger King’s "2 for $5" and "3 for $7" offers, are drawing budget-conscious diners and influencing pricing strategies across the QSR sector.
  • McDonald’s also topped expectations, reporting 3.1% same-store sales growth versus an LSEG-based estimate of 2.8%, aided by meal deals and marketing promotions.

Restaurant Brands International reported that its fourth-quarter comparable sales came in above estimates, driven in part by resilient traffic at both its Burger King and Tim Hortons brands. Investors reacted positively, with the company’s U.S.-listed shares trading about 2% higher in premarket activity.

The company and other quick-service restaurants have leaned into affordability as a strategic lever to attract cost-conscious diners. Restaurant Brands’ Burger King chain rolled out value-meal promotions over the past year, including "2 for $5" and "3 for $7" offers, which the company highlighted as part of the mix that helped sustain traffic.

McDonald’s reported its own quarterly results that also beat expectations. The fast-food giant posted global comparable sales and profit above estimates on Wednesday, supported by promotional meal deals and intensified marketing activity. McDonald’s reported quarterly same-store sales growth of 3.1%, exceeding consensus estimates of a 2.8% increase, according to data compiled by LSEG.

Both Restaurant Brands and McDonald’s point to value-focused promotions and marketing as contributors to recent same-store sales outperformance. These developments underscore a broader emphasis within parts of the quick-service segment on affordability as customer demand remains sensitive to price.


Summary

Restaurant Brands International beat fourth-quarter comparable sales estimates, helped by steady customer traffic at Burger King and Tim Hortons and by value-oriented meal offers introduced over the past year. The company’s U.S.-listed shares rose about 2% premarket. McDonald’s also topped expectations, reporting 3.1% same-store sales growth versus an expected 2.8%, with the company citing meal deals and robust marketing.

Key points

  • Restaurant Brands’ fourth-quarter comparable sales exceeded estimates, aided by resilient traffic at Burger King and Tim Hortons - impact: quick-service restaurant (QSR) sector and consumer discretionary markets.
  • Value-focused menus and promotions, such as Burger King’s "2 for $5" and "3 for $7" offers, continue to attract budget-conscious diners - impact: pricing strategies and promotional activity across fast-food operators.
  • McDonald’s also delivered stronger-than-expected global comparable sales and profit, with 3.1% same-store sales growth versus LSEG consensus of 2.8% - impact: major industry peers and investor sentiment in quick-service equities.

Risks and uncertainties

  • The report does not include forward-looking guidance in this coverage, leaving the durability of current traffic and promotional effectiveness uncertain - impacts QSR revenue visibility.
  • The article notes that pricier rivals are struggling, which indicates segmentation pressures within the restaurant sector; outcome differences across price tiers remain unclear - impacts higher-end casual dining and competitive positioning.
  • The coverage does not provide margin or cost details tied to value promotions, so the effect of sustained discounting on profitability is not detailed here - impacts operators' margin outlook and investor assessment.

Risks

  • The article does not provide forward-looking guidance, so the sustainability of current traffic trends and promotional effectiveness is uncertain - impacts QSR revenue visibility.
  • The coverage notes pricier rivals are struggling, indicating unclear outcomes across different price tiers in the restaurant sector - impacts casual dining and market segmentation.
  • The article does not disclose margin or cost impacts from extended value offers, leaving the effect of discounting on profitability unspecified - impacts operators' margin outlook.

More from Stock Markets

Australian Shares Slip as Healthcare, Financials and Gold Weigh on Index Apr 29, 2026 Fuchs posts Q1 results above forecasts, raises sales outlook for 2026 Apr 29, 2026 Huhtamaki Tops Q1 Expectations but Flags Rising Polymer Costs as Margin Risk Apr 29, 2026 Kambi Holds FY26 EBITA Target Despite €4m Colombia Tax Hit Apr 29, 2026 Pernod Ricard Calls Off Merger Negotiations With Brown-Forman Apr 29, 2026