Stock Markets May 11, 2026 09:05 AM

Piper Sandler: Tesla's Optimus Is Being Priced In at No Extra Cost in Updated Valuation

Analyst's 17-product model values core Tesla at roughly $400 per share, leaving Optimus and related businesses as upside toward a $500 target

By Caleb Monroe TSLA

Piper Sandler released an updated Tesla valuation framework that places the combined value of 17 discrete Tesla product lines at about $400 per share without assigning any value to the Optimus humanoid robot business. The firm maintains an Overweight rating and a $500 price target, implying substantial optionality for Optimus and related services.

Piper Sandler: Tesla's Optimus Is Being Priced In at No Extra Cost in Updated Valuation
TSLA

Key Points

  • Piper Sandler's model values 17 Tesla product lines at about $400 per share without ascribing value to Optimus.
  • The firm maintains an Overweight rating and a $500 price target, implying Optimus and related businesses represent material upside.
  • The updated framework explicitly includes in-house insurance, Supercharging, a separate robotaxi valuation, and Tesla's 2025 CEO compensation plan.

Piper Sandler has rolled out a revised valuation framework for Tesla that, according to the firm's lead analyst, implies investors are effectively receiving the company's Optimus humanoid robot business at no incremental cost at current equity prices.

Framework and headline conclusion

Analyst Alexander Potter framed the updated model as an effort to capture a broader set of Tesla's monetizable assets, estimating that 17 distinct product lines sum to a per-share value of roughly $400. That figure sits just under where the stock is trading, and Potter emphasized the implication in plain terms: "At $400/share, we think investors can buy Optimus for 'free,'" he wrote.

The update leaves Piper Sandler's investment view intact, with the firm continuing to carry an Overweight rating and a $500 price target on the stock.

What the model includes

Potter described this version of the valuation as "the TSLA model we've always wanted to build." It broadens the scope of revenue and profit forecasts beyond what many sell-side peers include. Explicitly considered in the updated framework are Tesla's in-house insurance business and Supercharging, plus a separate valuation for a robotaxi business that is distinct from the firm's full self-driving (FSD) software valuation.

The model also incorporates Tesla's 2025 CEO compensation plan for the first time, according to Potter.

Estimates, conservatism, and optionality

Potter acknowledged that his 2026-2027 estimates sit below consensus, a result he attributes to expectations for declining deliveries from discontinued products and a reduced contribution from regulatory credits. Despite the lower near-term estimates, he said he remains "unconcerned," noting that traditional metrics are becoming less central as FSD subscriber counts and robotaxi metrics take on greater importance in the company's valuation.

On the subject of Optimus specifically, Potter asserted that the humanoid robot and related inference-as-a-service businesses "arguably will be worth more than Tesla's other businesses combined," while also stating that he has not formally modeled those businesses yet.

Under Piper Sandler's $500 price target, Optimus and related services would account for about $100 per share of implied value; Potter indicated he believes that $100 figure is likely conservative.


Key takeaways

  • Piper Sandler's updated valuation places core Tesla assets at approximately $400 per share without valuing Optimus.
  • The firm retains an Overweight rating and a $500 price target, implying further upside from unmodeled businesses like Optimus and inference-as-a-service.
  • The new model expands coverage to include in-house insurance, Supercharging, a standalone robotaxi valuation, and Tesla's 2025 CEO compensation plan.

Risks and uncertainties

  • Potter's 2026-2027 estimates are lower than consensus, reflecting expectations for falling deliveries from discontinued products and diminished regulatory credit contributions - a near-term earnings and delivery risk for the automotive and regulatory credit-related segments.
  • Key future valuation drivers such as FSD subscriber growth, robotaxi metrics, and Optimus economics remain unmodeled or early-stage, creating execution and forecasting uncertainty for autonomous services and robotics exposure.
  • The optimistic optionality assigned to unmodeled businesses depends on future monetization of FSD, robotaxi operations, and inference-as-a-service, making valuation sensitive to adoption rates and service economics in mobility and AI-related services.

Risks

  • Lower 2026-2027 estimates than consensus driven by declining deliveries from discontinued products and a smaller regulatory credits contribution - impacts automotive revenue and margins.
  • Valuation depends increasingly on FSD subscriber counts and robotaxi metrics, which are early-stage drivers with execution and adoption uncertainty - impacts autonomous services and mobility sectors.
  • Optimus and inference-as-a-service remain unmodeled and could introduce significant variability in future valuation depending on commercialization success - impacts robotics and AI service markets.

More from Stock Markets

S&P Moves Mexico’s Outlook to Negative, Citing Fiscal Strain and Tepid Growth May 12, 2026 Moody's Lowers Everforth Outlook to Negative Amid Elevated Leverage May 12, 2026 Moody's Moves Albemarle Outlook to Stable After Debt Cuts and Stronger Lithium Prices May 12, 2026 Moody's Keeps Garrett Motion Rating Steady, Moves Outlook to Positive May 12, 2026 S&P Lowers Embecta Rating After Sharp Revenue Drop and Market Share Loss May 12, 2026