Economy May 5, 2026 10:18 AM

SEC Moves to Repeal Biden-Era Climate Disclosure Rule, Cites Return to 'Core Mandate'

Agency prepares draft regulations to unwind 2024 climate disclosure requirements as OMB reviews text; timeline for final action remains unclear

By Marcus Reed
SEC Moves to Repeal Biden-Era Climate Disclosure Rule, Cites Return to 'Core Mandate'

The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting rules to roll back a 2024 climate-related disclosure requirement designed to give investors information on companies' climate spending, emissions and risks. The action follows the agency's earlier decision not to defend the rule in court and comes amid an administration intent on undoing prior climate-related regulations.

Key Points

  • SEC is drafting regulations to rescind a 2024 climate-related disclosure rule intended to report companies' climate risks, emissions and spending.
  • The agency previously stayed the rule amid court challenges and in March of last year voted not to defend it in litigation; an appeals court then suspended consideration of the case.
  • The SEC says rescinding the rule will return disclosures to a focus on information deemed material to investors; OMB review of the draft text must conclude before the agency may act.

Washington - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is preparing regulatory text intended to rescind a Biden-era rule that would have required public companies to disclose climate-related risks, greenhouse gas emissions and related spending, according to a notice posted on the federal budget office website.

The move follows a year in which the SEC declined to tell a federal court whether it intended to modify the 2024 regulation or to defend it against legal challenges brought by industry groups and Republican-led states. Those groups had contested the rule shortly after it was issued under the previous administration, and the SEC had placed the rule on hold while litigation proceeded.

In a statement, SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the agency is seeking to rescind the rule to bring disclosures back into alignment with what he described as the commission's "core mandate" - that public company reporting focus on information that is material to investors and on the SEC's legal authority to require such disclosures.

Under the Biden administration, the commission issued a scaled-back set of requirements that aimed to make companies report climate-related risks, emissions and spending. Those provisions were immediately met with court challenges from Republican-led states and an industry association, which prompted a stay while those challenges were adjudicated.

Following the change in administration, the SEC voted in March of last year to stop defending the rule in court. That decision was criticized by industry and conservative critics, who argued it exceeded the commission's legal authority. After the SEC's decision, an appeals court suspended further consideration of the case.

The agency's next steps depend on completion of the Office of Management and Budget's review of the draft regulatory text posted on the budget office site. The SEC may proceed with the proposed rescission once OMB finishes its review; however, no definitive timeline for final action has been provided.


Context and implications

The original rule was introduced to provide investors with standardized information about companies' exposures to climate-related risks and their emissions and spending in response. The proposed rescission aims to remove that requirement and refocus disclosure obligations on what the SEC deems material to investment decisions.

How quickly the SEC moves will depend on internal processes and the completion of the OMB review. The appeals court suspension of litigation means the legal status of the original rule remains unresolved until the agency and the courts take further steps.

Risks

  • Timing uncertainty - No timeline is available for final agency action, creating continued legal and regulatory uncertainty for companies and investors (affects corporate compliance and legal sectors).
  • Information gap risk - Rescinding the rule would remove a standardized source of climate-related disclosures that had been intended to assist investor assessment of company climate spending and risks (affects investment analysis and ESG-focused funds).
  • Legal uncertainty - With litigation paused by an appeals court and the SEC having ceased to defend the rule, the ultimate judicial or administrative outcome remains unresolved (affects legal services and regulatory compliance sectors).

More from Economy

JPMorgan: April saw a pullback in deal activity as Iran war uncertainty prompted client pauses May 5, 2026 Fed’s Bowman Flags Rising Threat from Consumer Fraud to Financial System May 5, 2026 Wolfe: One Big Beautiful Bill Provides Modest Lift but Not the Boom Expected May 5, 2026 Satellite imagery points to Iranian tanker possibly bypassing U.S. Gulf blockade May 5, 2026 Recent college graduate unemployment unchanged at 5.6% in March, New York Fed says May 5, 2026