World January 28, 2026

Trump Rebukes Minneapolis Mayor After Standoff Over Immigration Policy

A public exchange highlights strained federal-local relations following controversial enforcement operations

By Derek Hwang
Trump Rebukes Minneapolis Mayor After Standoff Over Immigration Policy

President Donald Trump publicly criticized Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey after the mayor declined to alter the city’s immigration enforcement stance in return for the removal of federal agents. The dispute follows a controversial federal deployment led by Tom Homan, which city officials say has harmed local communities and which escalated after federal officers killed two U.S. citizens during street protests tied to deportation operations.

Key Points

  • Mayor Frey refused to modify Minneapolis' immigration enforcement policies in return for withdrawal of federal agents, stating the city will not enforce federal immigration laws.
  • President Trump publicly criticized Frey, calling his statement a serious violation of the law and warning he is "playing with fire."
  • Federal official Tom Homan was sent as part of a leadership reorganization aimed at reducing tensions, but the deployment has been controversial and followed an escalation after federal officers killed two U.S. citizens during street protests tied to deportation operations.

President Donald Trump issued a public rebuke of Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey on Wednesday after Frey refused to change municipal immigration enforcement to secure the withdrawal of federal personnel from the city.

In a social media post, the president wrote: "Could somebody in his inner sanctum please explain that this statement is a very serious violation of the Law, and that he is PLAYING WITH FIRE!" The comment followed a direct exchange between city leadership and a senior federal official dispatched to Minneapolis.

Mayor Frey told Tom Homan, the federal official assigned to the city, that "Minneapolis does not and will not enforce federal immigration laws." Frey also informed Homan of "the serious negative impacts this operation has had on Minneapolis and surrounding communities," reflecting municipal concerns about the federal presence.

The interaction has intensified questions about the stability of relations between local and federal authorities in Minneapolis, where tensions have risen around recent enforcement actions. The federal deployment has been the subject of debate within the city, with officials and residents expressing concern about its effects.

Tom Homan was sent to Minneapolis as part of a leadership reorganization intended by federal authorities to ease friction. Despite that stated aim, the deployment proved contentious and has been associated with an escalation in hostilities following an incident in which federal officers killed two U.S. citizens during street protests that occurred in the context of deportation operations.

City leaders have framed their position as a refusal to assume responsibility for enforcing federal immigration statutes, while federal officials have maintained a presence in the area. The public dispute between the president and the city mayor underscores an ongoing friction over jurisdiction and tactics in handling immigration enforcement on local streets.


Key points

  • Mayor Jacob Frey declined to change Minneapolis' immigration enforcement policies in exchange for removal of federal agents, asserting the city will not enforce federal immigration laws.
  • President Trump publicly criticized Frey, calling the mayor's statement a serious violation of law and warning that he is "playing with fire."
  • The federal deployment, led in part by Tom Homan, was intended to reduce tensions but has been controversial and coincided with an escalation after two U.S. citizens were killed by federal officers during protests.

Risks and uncertainties

  • Ongoing tension between federal and local authorities creates uncertainty for public-sector governance and law enforcement coordination in Minneapolis.
  • The controversial federal presence and related fatalities raise the risk of further civil unrest or confrontations during immigration enforcement actions.

Risks

  • Continued strain between federal and local authorities could complicate coordination on public safety and immigration enforcement, affecting local governance and law enforcement sectors.
  • The controversial federal presence and the reported deaths during protests raise the possibility of further unrest, with implications for municipal services and public order.

More from World

U.S. Olympic hospitality site renamed 'Winter House' after protests over ICE shootings Feb 2, 2026 Greenland’s premier says U.S. still aims for control despite ruling out military action Feb 2, 2026 Kremlin says Russia has long offered to process or store Iran’s enriched uranium Feb 2, 2026 Long-Awaited Rafah Reopening Prompts Hope and Anxiety Among Palestinians Stranded Across Border Feb 2, 2026 Rafah Reopens but Core Questions Persist Over Implementation of Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Feb 2, 2026