World April 7, 2026

DHS Official Says U.S. Could Halt International Processing at Airports in Sanctuary Jurisdictions

Homeland Security signals option to withdraw customs processing at major airports that decline to cooperate on immigration enforcement, threatening trade and tourism flows

By Leila Farooq
DHS Official Says U.S. Could Halt International Processing at Airports in Sanctuary Jurisdictions

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said customs officials might stop processing international arrivals at major U.S. airports located in jurisdictions labeled as sanctuary cities or states. The possible move, raised amid a funding impasse in Congress, could disrupt international air travel and commerce at large hubs and affect events such as the upcoming FIFA World Cup.

Key Points

  • DHS may remove customs processing at major airports in jurisdictions labeled as sanctuary cities or states, potentially disrupting international travel and commerce - impacts aviation, tourism and trade sectors.
  • The Department of Justice’s October 2025 list of sanctuary jurisdictions includes cities with large international airports such as New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and San Francisco, amplifying potential reach of any operational change - impacts airport operations and logistics.
  • Funding deadlock in Congress over Homeland Security, including Customs and Border Protection, underpins the administration’s consideration of operational options, linking fiscal and operational risks - impacts federal agencies and related budget planning.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said on Tuesday that U.S. customs officials could cease processing international travelers at major airports located in jurisdictions designated as sanctuary cities or states that have resisted cooperation with the administration’s immigration policies.

Mullin suggested the step as one option being considered while Congress remains deadlocked over new funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including for Customs and Border Protection. He said he expected to discuss the idea with President Trump but emphasized that no final decision had been made.

"It’s an option," Mullin said to reporters in North Carolina, noting the possibility of pulling customs officers from airports in cities that have adopted restrictions on local immigration enforcement. "If cities are going to sit there and say that they’re not going to enforce immigration policies, then I’ll repeat myself and say it doesn’t make any sense for us to process international travelers through that city."

Officials have described the withdrawal of customs processing as one among several measures under consideration as legislative negotiations over DHS funding continue without resolution. Mullin said the administration would begin conversations about the proposal but added, "This isn’t something that I’m necessarily going to do," and that it remained a subject under consideration.

The U.S. Department of Justice previously published a list of jurisdictions in October 2025 that it categorized as sanctuary cities and states. That list includes numerous metropolitan areas with major international gateways such as Denver, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, Newark, Seattle and San Francisco.

Stopping customs processing in airports located in those locales could have far-reaching consequences for air travel and commerce. More than 50 million international travelers arrived at the three major New York airports alone last year. Officials and industry observers have warned that such a move could effectively halt international air traffic and associated trade in affected hubs.

The potential disruption also carries implications for major international events. The FIFA World Cup is set to begin in early June, and interruptions to customs processing at major airports could have material ramifications for travel related to the tournament.

Mullin linked the consideration of withdrawing customs personnel to the broader political standoff over immigration enforcement funding. He cited the ongoing failure of congressional negotiators to reach a deal to fund DHS, saying Democrats have refused to support additional money for the administration’s immigration crackdown without reforms aimed at scaling back aggressive tactics.

The Homeland Security secretary argued that state and local measures that limit immigration enforcement conflict with federal immigration law and framed such policies as a motivation for considering the removal of customs resources from airports in noncooperative jurisdictions.


Next steps

At this stage, Mullin indicated discussions will continue inside the administration and with lawmakers as options are weighed, but he did not announce any immediate changes to customs operations at airports.

Risks

  • Possible suspension of customs processing could severely disrupt international passenger flows and cargo movement at affected airports, posing operational and economic risks for airlines, freight carriers, and tourism businesses.
  • Uncertainty over whether customs offices will be withdrawn creates planning and logistical challenges for airports, carriers, and event organizers, including those coordinating travel for large international events such as the FIFA World Cup.
  • Legal and political disputes between federal authorities and state or local jurisdictions over immigration enforcement could prolong uncertainty and complicate funding negotiations, affecting DHS operational readiness.

More from World

ICE agents shoot and wound man after alleged vehicle attack in California town Apr 7, 2026 Banga Defends World Bank’s Role in Gaza Reconstruction and Trusteeship of Donor Funds Apr 7, 2026 Pakistan Asks U.S. to Postpone Iran Deadline by Two Weeks to Allow Diplomacy Apr 7, 2026 U.N. Preliminary Inquiry Finds Israeli Tank Fire and Likely Hezbollah IED Killed Indonesian Peacekeepers Apr 7, 2026 Pope Leo Decries Threats to Iranian Civilians as 'Truly Unacceptable' Apr 7, 2026