Stock Markets January 21, 2026

Wall Street Restrictions on Homebuyers May Elevate House Prices, Investors Suggest

Efforts to limit institutional purchases face challenges without increasing housing supply, say market experts

By Jordan Park
Wall Street Restrictions on Homebuyers May Elevate House Prices, Investors Suggest

The executive order issued by U.S. President Donald Trump aimed at limiting Wall Street investors' acquisition of single-family homes might increase housing demand but does little to expand the housing supply. Experts warn this imbalance could exacerbate already high home prices rather than alleviate affordability issues, highlighting the critical role of supply-side reforms generally controlled at the local level.

Key Points

  • President Trump’s executive order aims to limit Wall Street investors’ role in single-family home purchases to improve affordability.
  • Experts emphasize that the housing affordability issue stems from supply constraints, with increased demand potentially pushing prices higher.
  • Local regulations largely determine housing supply, limiting federal government’s ability to significantly expand housing stock despite efforts to reduce construction costs.

President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order intended to curb the influence of Wall Street investors in the single-family home market, a move presented as an effort to enhance housing affordability across the United States. This directive, announced during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, seeks to diminish competition from institutional buyers and favor individual homeowners in the purchasing process.

The order mandates federal regulators to encourage home sales predominantly directed towards individual buyers. It also sets forth guidelines to prevent federal housing programs from inadvertently facilitating home acquisitions by Wall Street firms. Moreover, it calls for increased antitrust scrutiny of institutional home purchases and urges Congress to formalize these changes through legislation.

Alongside these measures, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett disclosed plans allowing 401(k) retirement funds to be used as down payments on homes, with further details forthcoming.

Despite these intentions, investors remain skeptical about the actual impact of the executive order on housing affordability, emphasizing that insufficient housing supply remains the primary driver of rising prices. David Wagner, head of equities and portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors, articulated that the fundamental issue is not a lack of demand but constrained supply. He warned that increasing demand without a corresponding rise in available homes is bound to elevate housing costs further.

Although the Trump administration has pursued policies designed to streamline construction and reduce related expenses, such as removing regulatory barriers to building and renovation, the main challenge to expanding housing stock lies within local government regulations and controls that the federal government cannot directly override.

Michael Rosen, chief investment officer at Angeles Investments, affirmed that boosting demand without enhancing supply typically results in increased prices. He highlighted the difficulty of effecting substantial changes to local building rules at the federal level but underscored the importance of making it easier to build new housing as the most effective remedy.

Since 2016, the year Trump was first elected, U.S. home prices have surged by approximately 75%, more than twice the rise in the Consumer Price Index. Nevertheless, recent data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency indicates a significant slowdown, with national home sale prices climbing only 1.7% in October over the preceding year—the smallest increase in over thirteen years. Concurrently, the National Association of Realtors has noted modest improvements in housing availability within the past year.

Jim Tobin, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, stated that his organization has actively engaged with the current administration to advocate for policies conducive to lowering housing production costs. Tobin also remarked that corporate investments in housing have contributed positively to new home construction.

A spokesperson for the White House, Davis Ingle, reassured the commitment of the administration to utilizing every viable tool to enhance housing affordability nationwide.

The presence of institutional investors such as Blackstone, American Homes 4 Rent, and Progress Residential in the single-family rental market has been significant since the 2008 financial crisis. As of June 2022, these entities collectively owned around 3% of all single-family rental homes, according to government data. These firms contest the notion that their involvement has driven up home prices, instead pointing to inadequate supply as the root cause.

In response, Blackstone reported being a net seller of homes over the last decade, while representatives from American Homes 4 Rent and Progress Residential did not immediately provide comments. However, experts caution that restrictions on institutional landlords might inadvertently dampen new home construction in the rental segment, potentially constraining supply further, as noted by the AEI Housing Center.

Following a 3.4% decline ending 2025, the Philadelphia Housing Sector Index has rebounded robustly, posting an 8.15% gain year-to-date, reflecting market volatility and investor interest.

Under mounting pressure to address voter concerns on housing affordability ahead of upcoming congressional elections, the Trump administration has unveiled additional initiatives, including government purchases of mortgage bonds and proposals for extended 50-year mortgages, aimed at encouraging homeownership.

The housing sector, having experienced a period of stagnation, is drawing cautious optimism from some investors who see potential in these policy measures. Greg Halter, director of research at Carnegie Investment Counsel, noted that successful implementation of these initiatives could yield substantial positive effects in the markets.

Risks

  • Restricting institutional buyers without increasing housing supply may intensify house price inflation, negatively impacting potential homebuyers.
  • Potential slowdown in corporate-backed rental home construction due to curbs on Wall Street landlords could further tighten housing availability.
  • Federal policy efforts face limitations since local government controls predominantly influence housing development, challenging nationwide supply expansion.

More from Stock Markets

Vanguard Lowers Fund Fees Again, Trimming Expense Ratios Across 53 Funds Feb 2, 2026 Snowflake Shares Edge Higher After $200 Million OpenAI Agreement Feb 2, 2026 Vanguard cuts fees on 53 index-backed funds and ETFs in second large reduction this year Feb 2, 2026 Insider Activity Spotlight: Major Purchases in Hycroft Mining Amid Heavy Volume; Multiple Executive Sales Across Tech and Energy Names Feb 2, 2026 60 Degrees Pharmaceuticals Shares Slide After GoodRx Deal to Offer Discounts on ARAKODA Feb 2, 2026