Stock Markets March 9, 2026

Goldman: S&P 500 Drawdown Mirrors Past Geopolitical Episodes, Recovery Hinges on Energy and Growth

Strategists say short-term losses are typical but prolonged oil supply shocks and rising uncertainty pose larger risks to earnings and valuations

By Maya Rios
Goldman: S&P 500 Drawdown Mirrors Past Geopolitical Episodes, Recovery Hinges on Energy and Growth

Goldman Sachs finds the recent S&P 500 sell-off tied to the Iran conflict follows historical patterns from prior geopolitical shocks: a sharp initial dip followed by a recovery within a month in prior episodes. The firm says modest oil price moves should have limited effects on U.S. growth, inflation, and aggregate S&P 500 earnings, but a sustained supply disruption or prolonged uncertainty could meaningfully hurt growth, corporate confidence, and cyclical sectors. AI investment remains an important offset to earnings growth over 2025-26, though productivity benefits have yet to show significant impact.

Key Points

  • Historical comparison: In seven similar geopolitical episodes since 1950, the S&P 500 fell on average about 4% in the first week but recovered within a month.
  • Oil sensitivity: Goldman estimates a sustained $10-per-barrel rise in oil would reduce 2026 U.S. GDP growth by roughly 10 basis points and raise core CPI by under 5 basis points.
  • Earnings drivers: AI investments and AI cloud services accounted for about 25% of S&P 500 EPS growth in 2025 and could contribute roughly 40% in 2026; meanwhile, sectoral effects of oil price moves leave aggregate S&P 500 earnings roughly neutral.

Goldman Sachs strategists say the market reaction to the recent escalation in the Middle East echoes patterns observed in earlier geopolitical shocks. The S&P 500 has retreated by roughly 2% since last Friday following the escalation, and volatility increased over the course of the week.

Examining seven comparable episodes since 1950, Goldman found that "the S&P 500 declined by an average of 4% in the first week but recovered within the subsequent month." That historical template, the strategists argue, suggests the current short-term drawdown is consistent with prior episodes of geopolitical risk.

Still, Goldman cautions that the ultimate path for equities will depend on developments in energy markets and on economic growth. The strategists note that modest increases in oil prices are likely to have limited direct consequences for U.S. growth and inflation. Specifically, they estimate that a sustained $10-per-barrel rise in oil would trim 2026 U.S. GDP growth by about 10 basis points and lift core consumer price inflation by fewer than 5 basis points.

The firm also highlights offsetting sectoral effects of higher oil. Energy producers tend to see improved earnings when crude rises, while consumer-facing businesses and industries that use oil as an input often face margin pressure. On balance, Goldman expects the net effect on S&P 500 earnings to be "roughly neutral," although outcomes will differ materially across sectors.

Goldman identifies a scenario with greater downside: a prolonged disruption to oil supply that weighs on economic activity. The strategists quantify the sensitivity of corporate earnings to growth, estimating that "every 1 pp change in real U.S. GDP growth corresponds to a 3-4% change in S&P 500 EPS." A sustained increase in uncertainty could also erode equity valuations, dampen corporate confidence, and undermine the nascent rebound in industrial activity that has supported rallies in many old economy cyclicals.

Beyond the energy channel, Goldman points to the trajectory of investment in artificial intelligence as a central driver of earnings growth. The firm estimates that AI investments and AI cloud services accounted for roughly 25% of S&P 500 EPS growth in 2025 and could contribute about 40% of that growth in 2026. While AI is expected to raise overall S&P 500 earnings over time through productivity gains, Goldman notes there is little evidence so far of a large productivity impact.

In sum, Goldman frames the current market move as a historically familiar short-term reaction to geopolitical risk, with the balance of outcomes dependent on whether oil price moves remain modest or escalate into a sustained supply shock, and on how investment themes such as AI evolve to support earnings in the months ahead.


Context for markets and sectors

  • Energy: Higher oil prices can boost energy sector earnings but pose a headwind to oil-using industries and consumer-facing firms.
  • Industrials and cyclicals: A rebound in industrial activity has underpinned recent gains in many old economy cyclicals; renewed uncertainty could reverse that trend.
  • Technology and AI-related firms: Continued investment in AI and cloud services is an important contributor to earnings growth, according to Goldman.

Risks

  • Prolonged oil supply disruption - could drag on economic activity and materially reduce corporate earnings, impacting energy consumers and cyclical sectors.
  • Sustained increase in uncertainty - may pressure equity valuations and corporate confidence, threatening the recovery in industrial activity and the performance of old economy cyclicals.
  • Sector dispersion - even if aggregate earnings are roughly neutral, consumer-facing companies and oil-intensive industries could experience outsized downside while energy firms benefit.

More from Stock Markets

Chinese Start-up ZYT Says Its New AI Outdrives CEO on Shenzhen Roads as It Eyes Trucking and Autos Mar 24, 2026 Grab to Buy foodpanda Taiwan for $600 Million; Profit Contribution Delayed Until 2028 Mar 24, 2026 BofA Identifies Mid-Cap Banks Poised for Margin and Loan Growth Mar 24, 2026 Germany's Separate Military Constellation Stokes EU Concerns Over Duplication and Cost Mar 24, 2026 Oracle refashions Fusion finance and procurement apps to run with AI agents Mar 24, 2026