Stock Markets January 29, 2026

Brothers Behind First Brands Indicted in New York Over Alleged Multi-Billion Dollar Fraud

Federal prosecutors accuse Patrick and Edward James of schemes that secured billions in financing for the collapsed auto parts firm

By Maya Rios
Brothers Behind First Brands Indicted in New York Over Alleged Multi-Billion Dollar Fraud

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan have unsealed an indictment charging First Brands Group founder Patrick James and his brother Edward with orchestrating multiple fraudulent schemes that allegedly extracted billions of dollars in financing from the company’s lenders and financing partners prior to the firm's bankruptcy.

Key Points

  • Patrick James and Edward James were indicted in Manhattan federal court on nine counts, including operating a continuing financial crimes enterprise, bank fraud, wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy.
  • Prosecutors allege the defendants used schemes such as inflating invoices, double- and triple-pledging collateral, falsifying financial statements and concealing liabilities to obtain financing.
  • The indictment states these schemes generated billions of dollars in financing for First Brands and produced millions of dollars in proceeds for the accused; the company later collapsed into bankruptcy.

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan on Thursday released an indictment charging Patrick James, the founder of First Brands Group, and his brother Edward James with a series of alleged financial crimes that preceded the auto parts company’s collapse into bankruptcy.

The indictment lists nine criminal counts against the two brothers. The charges include operating a continuing financial crimes enterprise, bank fraud, wire fraud and a conspiracy to commit money laundering. Prosecutors say the accusations stem from a coordinated pattern of deceptive practices directed at lenders and financing partners.

According to the court filing made public in New York, the defendants are accused of carrying out multiple schemes to obtain financing for First Brands. Those schemes are said to have included inflating invoices, pledging the same collateral more than once, falsifying financial statements and hiding substantial liabilities.

Prosecutors wrote in the indictment: "These schemes yielded billions of dollars in financing to First Brands and enabled Patrick James and Edward James to reap millions of dollars in proceeds derived from their fraud." The filing frames the alleged conduct as systematic and financially consequential for the company’s creditors.

The unsealing of the indictment follows the bankruptcy of First Brands. The filing ties the alleged misconduct directly to financing relationships used by the company, and to the sums lenders provided based on representations that prosecutors say were false or misleading.

Lawyers for the defendants were not immediately available for comment, the indictment noted.


Context and consequences

The charges now facing the James brothers are criminal in nature and will proceed through the federal court process in Manhattan. The indictment does not resolve civil or bankruptcy disputes tied to the collapse of First Brands, nor does it determine recovery outcomes for creditors. The public filing details the prosecutors’ allegations but does not itself establish guilt.

What is known and what remains unclear

  • The indictment publicly accuses the brothers of inflating invoices, double- and triple-pledging collateral, falsifying financial statements and concealing liabilities.
  • Prosecutors state the schemes produced billions of dollars in financing for First Brands and generated millions in proceeds for the defendants.
  • The eventual legal and financial outcomes from the criminal case and the company’s bankruptcy remain to be determined in court and in related proceedings.

Risks

  • Uncertain legal outcomes - Criminal proceedings are pending and will determine whether the allegations result in convictions, sentencing or other legal consequences for the defendants. This affects the resolution of the case in the federal judicial system.
  • Financial exposure for lenders and financing partners - Prosecutors allege lenders provided billions of dollars based on fraudulent information; the full scale of recoverable assets and creditor losses is not determined.
  • Ongoing bankruptcy-related uncertainty - The company’s collapse into bankruptcy introduces unresolved civil and creditor processes that will interact with the criminal case and influence financial recoveries.

More from Stock Markets

Moody's Raises Twilio to Ba1, Cites Growth Trajectory and Conservative Financial Discipline Feb 2, 2026 Moody's Raises OUTFRONT Media Credit Rating to Ba3, Citing Lower Leverage and Digital Push Feb 2, 2026 Moody's Moves Mister Car Wash Outlook to Positive as Credit Metrics Improve Feb 2, 2026 S&P Elevates SM Energy to BB After Civitas Deal, Cites Bigger Footprint and Diversification Feb 2, 2026 NXP Sees Strong Start to Quarter, Cites Automotive Strength and Stable Industrial Demand Feb 2, 2026