Stock Markets February 3, 2026

Bernstein Says Uber Already Prices in Major AV Disruption, Keeps Upside Despite Selloff

Analyst Nikhil Devnani argues valuation is not the main catalyst and contends much autonomous vehicle risk is reflected in the stock

By Jordan Park UBER
Bernstein Says Uber Already Prices in Major AV Disruption, Keeps Upside Despite Selloff
UBER

Bernstein analysts defended Uber after a recent drop in its share price, saying their analysis already accounts for significant autonomous vehicle (AV) disruption. Using a discounted cash flow scenario in which AVs fully disrupt U.S. Mobility over 15 years, Bernstein's work still implies only a modest downside versus current levels and leaves upside to a $115 price target under the firm's assumptions.

Key Points

  • Bernstein argues significant autonomous vehicle risk is already reflected in Uber's share price and retained an Outperform rating with a $115 price target.
  • A DCF that assumes complete AV disruption of U.S. Mobility over 15 years still implies a $65-70 stock, versus recent trading around $80.
  • Segment-level valuation and projected ~35% core EPS growth drive a 2027 PEG ratio near 0.5x; U.S. Mobility is valued at 10-12x EV/NTM EBITDA while International Mobility receives a mid-teens EBITDA multiple, and Delivery and Freight add further value.

Analysts at Bernstein moved to defend Uber following a recent decline in the company's share price, arguing in a client note that the market has already baked in considerable autonomous vehicle risk. The team, led by Nikhil Devnani, emphasized that valuation by itself is not a catalyst in this sector and that concerns around AV adoption have been a key driver of the stock's fall.

Devnani presented an illustrative discounted cash flow (DCF) exercise that models an extreme outcome: complete disruption of the U.S. Mobility business by AVs over a 15-year period. Even under that severe scenario, the DCF implies a stock in the $65-70 range, while the shares recently traded at around $80.

Bernstein highlighted several structural elements that support Uber's valuation. Devnani pointed to roughly 35% core EPS growth potential and calculated that Uber's 2027 PEG ratio would be about 0.5x under those growth assumptions. The firm also ran a sum-of-the-parts exercise that values U.S. Mobility at 10-12x EV/NTM EBITDA, applies a mid-teens EBITDA multiple to International Mobility, and assigns incremental value to the Delivery and Freight segments.

In the DCF scenario, Bernstein assumed the U.S. Mobility segment begins to decline in 2030 and faces margin compression prior to an eventual wind-down. The note stresses that growth in international markets along with continued expansion of Delivery help offset the hypothetical losses in the domestic mobility business.

Devnani characterized the implied downside in the severe disruption case as relatively contained, noting it is only 15-20% lower than current levels even with the adverse assumptions applied. Based on this analysis, Bernstein retained an Outperform rating and kept a $115 price target on the shares, asserting that much of the AV-related risk appears to be priced into the stock and that international mobility and Delivery expansion provide a buffer against disruption.


Context and implications

The note frames the debate around Uber as one of risk timing and segment diversification: while AV adoption poses substantial upside or downside for ride-hailing economics, Bernstein's segmentation and DCF work suggest that other growth engines can materially mitigate U.S. Mobility weakness.

Risks

  • Autonomous vehicle adoption presents a material uncertainty for U.S. Mobility revenues and margins, as illustrated by the DCF scenario that assumes a decline starting in 2030 - impacts mobility and related transportation sectors.
  • Margin compression and eventual closure of the U.S. Mobility business in the adverse DCF case could pressure overall profitability, affecting ride-hailing economics and investor returns.
  • Market reaction to changing AV timelines or to disappointing international or Delivery growth could widen downside beyond the illustrative 15-20% implied in Bernstein's scenario - relevant to equity markets and transportation services investors.

More from Stock Markets

Palantir Shares Jump on Strong Quarter as U.S. Defense Spending Lifts Sales Feb 3, 2026 Ottawa Mulls Reinstating EV Purchase Rebates as National Auto Strategy Nears Feb 3, 2026 FCAC fines Bank of Montreal $4M over undisclosed banking program fees Feb 3, 2026 Mixed Market Momentum: Palantir, Woodward Rally as IBM, PayPal Slide Feb 3, 2026 Senate Commerce Committee Schedules Hearing with NTSB Chair After Fatal D.C. Mid-Air Collision Feb 3, 2026