Politics January 20, 2026

US Justice Department Issues Subpoenas to Minnesota Officials Amid Immigration Enforcement Probe

Federal Grand Jury Examines State and Local Opposition to Expanded ICE Operations in Minneapolis Area

By Marcus Reed
US Justice Department Issues Subpoenas to Minnesota Officials Amid Immigration Enforcement Probe

The U.S. Justice Department has issued subpoenas to Minnesota's governor, attorney general, and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul as part of a federal grand jury investigation into whether their public opposition to increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity constitutes criminal conduct. The probes follow unprecedented immigration enforcement operations conducted by the Trump administration that have generated significant local resistance and legal challenges.

Key Points

  • The U.S. Justice Department has issued grand jury subpoenas to Minnesota's top state and local Democratic officials investigating their opposition to federal immigration enforcement operations.
  • The Trump administration's deployment of thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents to the Minneapolis area has sparked violent incidents, legal challenges, and widespread local protests.
  • Federal courts have intervened to limit law enforcement tactics against peaceful protesters, while state officials have called for accountability and transparency regarding ICE activities.

In a significant legal development on January 20, the U.S. Justice Department served subpoenas on six Minnesota state and local Democratic officials, including the offices of Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul. These subpoenas come amid a federal grand jury investigation scrutinizing whether the officials' vocal resistance to the Trump administration's intensified immigration enforcement actions amounts to any criminal wrongdoing.

One subpoena obtained and disclosed by Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey demands that his office's custodian of records supply documents dating from early 2025 that pertain to "cooperation or lack of cooperation with federal immigration authorities." This inquiry is focused on examining the extent and nature of coordination between local entities and federal immigration agencies under enforcement pressure.

U.S. Attorney Pam Bondi, speaking in an interview with Fox News after arriving in Minnesota, emphasized the impartiality of the law, stating, "Whether it’s a public official, whether it’s a law enforcement officer, no one is above the law in this state or in this country, and people will be held accountable." She underscored that the safety of law enforcement agents is a priority, though she refrained from directly addressing the most recent subpoenas.

Under President Donald Trump's directive, thousands of Border Patrol and ICE personnel have been deployed to the Minneapolis metropolitan area in recent weeks to conduct large-scale deportation operations. These efforts, unprecedented in scope for the region, have triggered violent clashes with local residents, drawing attention for agents' appearances in military-style camouflage, tactical gear, and armed patrols through snowy city streets.

Both Governor Walz and Mayor Frey have publicly condemned the operations, characterizing them as dangerous political theater designed to provoke unrest. Walz warned that the enforcement surge risked endangering the public and escalating tensions that could justify even greater federal intervention. While urging local residents to maintain peaceful protests, Walz also called on citizens to document any encounters with ICE agents, suggesting such media could be utilized in future legal actions against potential misconduct by federal officers.

Federal officials within the Trump administration have rebutted these charges, accusing Walz and Frey of deliberately fomenting interference with ICE actions in coordination with anti-government groups, an allegation the Minnesota leaders have denied. At present, the Justice Department has declined to provide additional commentary on the situation.

The local backlash against the ICE operations intensified following the fatal shooting of an American woman, Renee Good, by an ICE agent approximately two weeks ago. Federal agents have also employed tear gas and other chemical irritants against demonstrators, provoking public outcry and concerns about racial profiling. Notably, recent incidents include the wrongful arrest of ChongLy "Scott" Thao, a 56-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, who was apprehended in his home without a warrant and inappropriately targeted during a search for two "criminal illegal aliens" from Laos subject to deportation orders.

Public records reveal that one of the individuals sought by ICE was incarcerated in a Minnesota prison at the time of the search. The U.S. Constitution prohibits warrantless forced entry into private residences or arrests absent probable cause, rights apparently contravened during Mr. Thao's detention. Following his release, Mr. Thao recounted that authorities did not present a warrant at the time of his arrest.

The subpoenas follow revelations that the Department of Justice has launched a criminal investigation into Governor Walz, Mayor Frey, and other Democratic officials critical of the enforcement surge. Walz, who was a vice-presidential candidate in the 2024 election cycle, decried the probe as a political tool intended to intimidate opponents of the Trump administration. He cited related investigations into other prominent figures deemed critical of Trump’s policies.

Federal prosecutors historically face challenges securing indictments based solely on public officials’ policy statements, given the high evidentiary standard. Grand juries, which must assess probable cause presented by prosecutors, have recently rejected indictments in high-profile cases involving New York Attorney General Letitia James and matters linked to enforcement actions in Washington, D.C.

In parallel with the legal inquiries, Minnesota Democrats have pursued lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the enforcement surge. A recent federal court injunction prohibits immigration agents operating in Minneapolis from detaining or using chemical crowd-control methods against peaceful protesters or onlookers. This ruling stemmed from litigation by citizens alleging violations of their constitutional rights by federal officers.

Governor Walz expressed that Minnesotans prioritize safety and community peace over efforts to intimidate public officials advocating for their constituencies. Mayor Frey similarly criticized the federal government’s measures as attempts to intimidate local leaders performing their official duties, emphasizing concerns over the wider implications for Americans everywhere.

Risks

  • Escalating federal investigations and legal action against political leaders may heighten political tensions and uncertainty in Minnesota, potentially impacting community relations and governance.
  • The ongoing enforcement surge and associated public backlash risk further civil disturbances and complicate effective immigration policy implementation in the region.
  • Widespread scrutiny and criticism of law enforcement practices could trigger operational challenges for agencies involved, potentially impacting law enforcement and public safety sectors.

More from Politics

Federal Judge Refuses to Halt DHS Immigration Operation in Minneapolis-St. Paul Feb 2, 2026 Judge Orders Release of Detained Father and Five-Year-Old; Family Returned to Minnesota, Lawmaker Says Feb 1, 2026 Democrat Flips Texas State Senate Seat, Prompting GOP Alarm Ahead of 2026 Feb 1, 2026 Chicago Mayor Orders Police to Probe Allegations of Illegal Conduct by Federal Immigration Agents Jan 31, 2026 Minneapolis Confrontations Persist as Trump Rebukes Mayor Over Immigration Stance Jan 30, 2026