Politics January 20, 2026

Federal Judge Orders Former Trump-Aligned Prosecutor Halligan to Cease Using ‘U.S. Attorney’ Title

Legal challenges end Lindsey Halligan’s contentious role as Eastern District of Virginia’s top federal prosecutor

By Priya Menon
Federal Judge Orders Former Trump-Aligned Prosecutor Halligan to Cease Using ‘U.S. Attorney’ Title

Lindsey Halligan, once acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia with close ties to former President Trump, has been directed by a federal judge to cease presenting herself as the region’s chief federal prosecutor amid questions over the legitimacy of her appointment. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Halligan’s exit following objections from Senate Democrats and judicial rulings that her 120-day interim term expired last year, concluding a turbulent tenure marked by dismissed cases against Trump’s adversaries and legal disputes over her authority.

Key Points

  • Lindsey Halligan’s interim appointment as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia expired, with courts ruling her tenure unlawful.
  • Federal Judge David Novak issued an order barring Halligan from identifying herself as the district's lead prosecutor, threatening disciplinary measures for noncompliance.
  • Halligan’s appointment faced Senate opposition, notably from Virginia’s Democratic senators leveraging the blue slip tradition to block her nomination permanently.
  • Cases initiated by Halligan against Trump’s opponents were dismissed due to questions over her lawful authority, with ongoing appeals from the Justice Department.

Lindsey Halligan, who served as an acting U.S. Attorney aligned closely with former President Donald Trump, is departing her position at the Justice Department, Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed Tuesday. This marks the end of her controversial period as United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, a role secured without full Senate confirmation.

Bondi attributed Halligan’s departure to opposition from Senate Democrats, who declined to approve her nomination for the permanent position. Halligan was serving under a 120-day interim appointment, a temporary measure which a federal judge ruled ended last year, questioning the legality of her continued tenure. This interim term, even under the Justice Department's contested interpretation, definitively concluded on Tuesday.

On the same day, U.S. District Judge David Novak issued an order prohibiting Halligan from referring to herself as the leading federal prosecutor in Virginia’s Eastern District within any court filings before him. He characterized her ongoing use of the title as a "charade," signaling perceived noncompliance by the Justice Department with a court mandate deeming her appointment unlawful.

Judge Novak, himself appointed by Trump during his first term, threatened disciplinary action against Halligan or any other prosecutor who persisted in using the title in his courtroom. He wrote, "No matter all of her machinations, Ms. Halligan has no legal basis to represent to this Court that she holds the position. Any such representation going forward can only be described as a false statement made in direct defiance of valid court orders."

Halligan’s appointment was initially orchestrated by President Trump, positioning her to lead investigations against political foes including former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. However, these cases were dismissed by a separate judge who ruled that Halligan’s appointment was unlawful. The Justice Department is currently appealing those dismissals.

The Trump administration awaited Senate consideration of Halligan’s permanent nomination. Yet, the longstanding Senate tradition called the "blue slip" process, particularly opposition from Virginia's Democratic senators, effectively prevented her confirmation. Attorney General Bondi stated, "Democratic Senators weaponized the blue slip process, making it impossible for Lindsey’s term as United States Attorney to continue following the expiration of her 120-day appointment."

Adding to the tension, the Justice Department responded in a recent legal filing with sharp criticism toward Judge Novak, accusing him of overstepping his jurisdiction in questioning Halligan’s appointment. Novak countered in his ruling, remarking that the department’s filing contained "a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable-news talk show and falls far beneath the level of advocacy expected from litigants in this Court, particularly the Department of Justice."

Separately on Tuesday, the court’s chief judge began soliciting applications for a court-appointed successor to oversee the Eastern District of Virginia. Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche suggested via social media that President Trump might dismiss any replacement appointed by the court.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty over the legitimacy of Halligan's appointment undermined prosecutorial authority in the Eastern District of Virginia, impacting enforcement continuity.
  • Political contention surrounding appointments may affect the Justice Department’s ability to prosecute high-profile cases, influencing judiciary operations.
  • Potential presidential interference or dismissal of court-appointed successors could create instability in district leadership and case management.

More from Politics

Federal Judge Refuses to Halt DHS Immigration Operation in Minneapolis-St. Paul Feb 2, 2026 Judge Orders Release of Detained Father and Five-Year-Old; Family Returned to Minnesota, Lawmaker Says Feb 1, 2026 Democrat Flips Texas State Senate Seat, Prompting GOP Alarm Ahead of 2026 Feb 1, 2026 Chicago Mayor Orders Police to Probe Allegations of Illegal Conduct by Federal Immigration Agents Jan 31, 2026 Minneapolis Confrontations Persist as Trump Rebukes Mayor Over Immigration Stance Jan 30, 2026