Politics February 10, 2026

Commerce Secretary Denies Close Ties to Epstein as Calls to Resign Mount

Howard Lutnick tells Senate he 'barely had anything to do with' convicted sex offender after Justice Department files reveal lunch visit

By Avery Klein
Commerce Secretary Denies Close Ties to Epstein as Calls to Resign Mount

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick disputed a close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at a Senate hearing on Feb. 10, saying he exchanged only about 10 emails with Epstein over 14 years and that a reported lunch on Epstein's private island occurred while his family was nearby. The remarks come after the Justice Department released millions of documents in January that included emails suggesting Lutnick visited the island, and follow Ghislaine Maxwell's refusal to answer questions at a House deposition.

Key Points

  • Howard Lutnick told a Senate committee he exchanged only about 10 emails with Jeffrey Epstein over 14 years and characterized his interactions as minimal - relevant to government and regulatory oversight sectors.
  • The U.S. Justice Department published millions of files in January that included emails indicating Lutnick attended a lunch on Epstein's private island after he had said he severed ties - relevant to congressional oversight and public ethics scrutiny.
  • Ghislaine Maxwell refused to answer questions at a deposition before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Monday, drawing bipartisan criticism and contributing to the broader political scrutiny.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10 - U.S. Commerce Department Secretary Howard Lutnick sought on Tuesday to distance himself from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein amid growing bipartisan calls for his resignation after new documents surfaced.

At a Senate hearing, Lutnick said he had "barely had anything to do with" Epstein, asserting the two men exchanged roughly 10 emails over a 14-year span. He addressed one specific item that has drawn scrutiny: emails disclosed in a package of documents the U.S. Justice Department published in January, described by officials as numbering in the millions, that included messages suggesting Lutnick visited Epstein's private island for lunch years after Lutnick said he had cut ties.

Under questioning from Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, Lutnick defended his conduct and offered context for the reported island visit. He said the lunch took place only because he happened to be on a boat near the island and that members of his family were present. He reiterated his broader position about the relationship in a direct statement to the Senate Committee.

"I did not have any relationship with him. I barely had anything to do with that person," he said.

The Senate exchange takes place against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny in Congress. Lawmakers noted that Lutnick now faces pressure from both Republican and Democratic members to step down.

The hearing followed a deposition on Monday in which Ghislaine Maxwell, a known associate of Epstein, declined to answer questions before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, according to lawmakers. Maxwell's refusal drew criticism from members on both sides of the aisle.

Officials and lawmakers continue to reference the recently released Justice Department records as the catalyst for renewed questions about past contacts between public figures and Epstein. Lutnick's testimony focused on minimizing the extent of his interactions, while members of Congress emphasized the need for accountability and clarity.

At this stage, Lutnick has maintained that his interactions with Epstein were limited and that the reported meeting was incidental. The situation remains fluid as congressional oversight continues and public attention persists on the disclosures contained in the Justice Department's release.

Risks

  • Elevated political risk to leadership continuity at the Commerce Department as Lutnick faces bipartisan calls to resign - this could affect policy stability relevant to trade and regulatory planning.
  • Ongoing congressional scrutiny and public attention following the Justice Department's document release creates uncertainty for officials named in the disclosures, with potential reputational and administrative consequences for those involved.
  • Further disclosures or testimony related to the Justice Department file release or subsequent depositions could prolong oversight activity and political distraction, affecting legislative focus on commerce-related issues.

More from Politics

Two ex-FBI agents sue Director Kash Patel, say firings tied to 2020 election probe work Mar 19, 2026 Federal Prosecutors Subpoena Former FBI Director James Comey in Miami Inquiry Mar 19, 2026 U.S. Intelligence Chief Finds No Confirmed Foreign Threat to November Midterms, Draws Senate Criticism Mar 19, 2026 Republican Leader and Intelligence Chiefs Seek Swift Renewal of Controversial Surveillance Authority Mar 19, 2026 House GOP Leader, Top Intelligence Officials Seek Swift Renewal of Section 702 Surveillance Authority Mar 19, 2026