Economy March 30, 2026

Powell Says Fed Positioned to 'Wait and See' Impact of Middle East-Driven Oil Surge

Chair emphasizes long and variable lags for monetary policy as oil supply shock unfolds

By Derek Hwang
Powell Says Fed Positioned to 'Wait and See' Impact of Middle East-Driven Oil Surge

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told an audience at Harvard University that monetary policy is well-positioned to pause and observe how rising oil prices from the Middle East conflict will affect U.S. inflation and economic activity. He reiterated that energy-driven price shocks tend to be transitory and that interest-rate adjustments work with long and variable lags, warning that premature tightening in response to a short-lived oil spike could harm the economy once the shock passes.

Key Points

  • Powell said monetary policy is well-placed to 'wait and see' how higher oil prices from the Middle East conflict affect inflation and the economy - sectors impacted include energy and broad consumer demand.
  • The Fed held interest rates steady earlier this month and the dot plot still indicates at least one rate cut this year, while the SEP shows expectations for higher core PCE inflation this year - impacting fixed income and market rate expectations.
  • Powell emphasized that monetary policy works with long and variable lags and that energy shocks have tended to be short-lived, supporting a cautious approach toward immediate rate changes.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on Monday that the central bank's current policy stance allows it to "wait and see" how sharply higher oil prices tied to the ongoing Middle East conflict will feed into U.S. inflation and economic growth.

Speaking in a moderated discussion at Harvard University, Powell largely echoed comments he made earlier this month at the conclusion of the Fed's most recent monetary policy meeting. He stressed that the central bank's instruments operate by influencing demand and that they do not typically generate meaningful short-term effects in response to abrupt oil supply disruptions.

"Energy shocks have tended to come and go pretty quickly. Monetary policy works with long and variable lags," Powell said.

Powell explained that raising interest rates to counter inflationary pressure originating from a jump in oil prices would likely be reflected in the economy only after the oil shock had passed. At that point, he warned, the tightening could act as an added drag on economic activity instead of addressing persistent inflation.

The chair reiterated the Fed's position established earlier this month when policymakers left interest rates on hold as broadly expected. In its post-meeting materials, the Fed's updated dot plot indicated that policymakers still project at least one rate cut within the year. The Summary of Economic Projections accompanying that guidance also showed expectations for higher core PCE inflation in the current year.

On the difficulties of drawing confident conclusions, Powell said reporters that if one element of the recent SEP could have been omitted it would have been that projection. He emphasized the wide range of possible outcomes and the limited certainty surrounding them.

"The thing I really want to emphasize is that nobody knows. The economics effect could be bigger, they could be smaller, they could be much smaller or much bigger. We just don't know. So people are writing down something that seems to make sense to them but have no conviction," he had said, remarks he again underscored at Harvard.

Powell's comments placed a spotlight on the timing challenge the Fed faces: monetary policy operates with long and uncertain lags, while energy price swings can be rapid and transient. That timing mismatch underpins the central bank's current inclination to observe incoming data and allow the full effects of the oil price shock to reveal themselves before making further policy adjustments.


What this means

  • Policymakers are cautious about reacting quickly to energy-driven inflation because policy tightening may materialize after the shock fades.
  • The Fed left rates unchanged earlier this month and continues to signal at least one cut later in the year, while also noting higher core PCE inflation expectations for the current year.
  • Uncertainty about the size and persistence of the oil-driven shock remains a central consideration for near-term policy decisions.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over the economic impact of the oil price spike - energy and consumer-facing sectors may face variable inflationary pressure depending on the shock's persistence.
  • The timing mismatch between policy effects and short-lived supply shocks - premature tightening could weigh on the broader economy once oil prices normalize.
  • Higher-than-expected core inflation projections in the SEP create uncertainty for markets that price future rate moves - this affects interest-rate sensitive sectors such as financials and real assets.

More from Economy

Fed Chair Says Private Credit Is Under Scrutiny but Not a Systemic Threat Mar 30, 2026 Egypt's Central Bank Poised to Hold Rates as Iran War Raises Inflation Risks Mar 30, 2026 IMF Warns Iran Conflict Will Lift Prices and Slow Global Growth Mar 30, 2026 Banxico Signals Rate-cut Cycle Nearing End, Governor Says Mar 30, 2026 NATO Downs Fourth Missile Over Turkey in Under a Month, Ankara Says Mar 30, 2026