Economy March 24, 2026

Minnesota Sues Federal Agencies to Gain Access to Evidence in Three Shootings During Immigration Enforcement Actions

State lawsuit accuses DOJ and DHS of blocking investigators from material linked to deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti and a separate injury case

By Priya Menon
Minnesota Sues Federal Agencies to Gain Access to Evidence in Three Shootings During Immigration Enforcement Actions

Minnesota filed suit against the U.S. Departments of Justice and Homeland Security seeking court-ordered access to evidence and information tied to two fatal shootings and one injury that occurred amid an immigration enforcement surge in the state. The complaint alleges federal authorities have refused to cooperate with state investigative demands and points to an earlier temporary restraining order, later dissolved by the issuing judge, that had barred destruction of evidence after the killing of Alex Pretti.

Key Points

  • Minnesota sued the U.S. Departments of Justice and Homeland Security seeking access to evidence tied to the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti and to a shooting that injured another man.
  • The complaint alleges federal authorities blocked state investigators from key evidence and information that spurred protests over the federal presence in the state.
  • A court in late January granted a temporary restraining order preventing destruction of evidence after Alex Pretti's killing; that order was later dissolved by the issuing judge.

(Correction: spelling of Renee Good)

Minnesota has initiated legal action against the federal government, asking a court to require U.S. law enforcement agencies to provide access to evidence tied to multiple shootings that occurred during an immigration enforcement operation in the state. The complaint, filed on Tuesday, names the U.S. Departments of Justice and Homeland Security and contends that federal authorities blocked state investigators from obtaining key evidence and information related to two fatal shootings and a separate shooting that left another man wounded.

The complaint focuses on the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti and on a third incident that resulted in injuries. According to the filing, the withheld material and information were central to state inquiries into those incidents and to public concerns that followed the enforcement activity.

In late January, after the killing of Alex Pretti, a court issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited federal investigators from destroying evidence connected to the state’s probe. That restraining order was later dissolved by the same judge who granted it.

The lawsuit seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief. It alleges an ongoing policy of noncooperation by the named federal departments and charges that this policy led to a refusal to comply with investigative requests from Minnesota authorities. The complaint includes the following language: "Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to set aside Defendants’ unlawful policy of noncooperation and their resulting refusal to comply with the investigative demands of Minnesota authorities."

The filing frames the dispute as centered on access to evidence and the adequacy of intergovernmental cooperation during criminal investigations tied to immigration enforcement operations in the state. The complaint does not, in itself, resolve questions about the underlying facts of the shootings or assign legal responsibility for them; rather, it seeks court intervention to secure evidence and information the state says federal agents withheld.

The complaint states that the withheld evidence and information prompted protests related to the federal presence and the enforcement activities in Minnesota. The lawsuit demands that the court declare the federal policy at issue unlawful and order the departments to comply with the investigative demands.

The legal action represents the state’s effort to obtain material it views as necessary to its investigations into the two deaths and the injury. The complaint pursues judicial remedies to change the departments’ handling of cooperative investigative requests and to prevent further obstruction of state investigative efforts.


Context and next steps

The complaint sets a course for judicial review of the dispute over investigative cooperation between state authorities and federal agencies. The court’s handling of the claims and any orders it issues will determine whether Minnesota gains access to the evidence it seeks; the complaint notes the prior temporary restraining order related to the death of Alex Pretti and the subsequent dissolution of that order by the issuing judge.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over whether the court will order federal agencies to produce the requested evidence - this affects legal and law enforcement processes.
  • Potential continued noncooperation between state and federal authorities, which could impede completion of state investigations and prolong public unrest.
  • Dissolution of the earlier temporary restraining order introduces uncertainty about the preservation of evidence pertinent to the state's inquiries.

More from Economy

Back-channel talks aim to secure month-long U.S.-Iran ceasefire via 15-point framework Mar 24, 2026 Markets Falter as Oil, Yields and Soft Activity Data Pressure Risk Assets Mar 24, 2026 Altman Relinquishes Direct Safety Oversight to Prioritize Fundraising and Datacenter Scale-up Mar 24, 2026 Trump Says Iran Delivered Large Energy Concession as Talks Continue Mar 24, 2026 Brazilian Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro into Temporary House Arrest on Medical Grounds Mar 24, 2026