Economy May 12, 2026 10:08 AM

Harvard Faculty Begin Vote on Proposal to Cap A Grades at 20% Plus Four Students

Measure seen as the strongest push in decades to rein in grade inflation as faculty ballot runs for one week with results due May 20

By Sofia Navarro

Harvard faculty opened a one-week vote on a plan to limit A grades in undergraduate courses to no more than 20% of the class plus four students. The move, described as the most consequential effort in decades to curb grade inflation, comes after A grades comprised roughly 60% of grades in the academic year ending mid-2025 and fell to 53% in the fall semester following calls for greater grading discipline. Results of the faculty ballot are expected on May 20.

Harvard Faculty Begin Vote on Proposal to Cap A Grades at 20% Plus Four Students

Key Points

  • Faculty began a one-week vote on a proposal to cap A grades at 20% of a class plus four additional students, with results expected on May 20.
  • The proposal is framed as the most significant attempt in decades to tackle grade inflation after A grades comprised roughly 60% of grades in the academic year ending mid-2025; that rate fell to 53% in the fall semester after calls for greater grading discipline.
  • Stakeholders cite implications for higher education admissions and employer evaluation processes; the White House previously included grading reform in a proposed compact tied to priority federal funding.

Harvard University faculty started voting Tuesday on a proposal that would cap A grades in undergraduate courses at no more than 20% of a class plus four additional students. Eligible faculty have one week to return their ballots, and the tally is scheduled to be announced on May 20.

Proponents of the change say it represents the most significant institutional effort in decades to address what many see as pervasive grade inflation. According to data cited in the proposal discussion, roughly 60% of grades awarded across the university in the academic year ending in mid-2025 were an A - a share that the university says is more than double the comparable rate reported in 2006. After university leadership urged faculty to adopt a more disciplined approach to evaluation, that A-grade share decreased to 53% in the fall semester.

Faculty who have spoken about the measure suggest there is substantial support for taking steps to limit grade inflation. At the same time, they acknowledge vocal opposition within the faculty ranks, and some observers say the measure may not secure the votes necessary to pass.

Supporters and critics have both framed the debate in practical terms. Critics of current grading patterns argue that elevated rates of top marks make it more difficult for employers and graduate schools to assess the relative performance of students. Backers of reform view a cap as a structural step to restore differentiation in undergraduate evaluations.

The current proposal is the latest in a series of efforts aimed at grading reform. The matter has also drawn attention beyond the university: the White House included grading reform in a proposed compact it offered last fall to select institutions, linking such commitments to priority access to federal funding.

The outcome of the faculty ballot will determine whether the proposed cap moves forward as formal policy. Given the mix of support and opposition described by faculty, the result remains uncertain as the vote proceeds during the one-week window.

Risks

  • The measure faces vocal opposition among faculty and may not pass the one-week ballot - uncertainty affecting higher education policy outcomes.
  • If the cap is not adopted, employers and graduate schools may continue to face challenges in differentiating student performance - a risk to hiring and admissions evaluation processes.
  • Even with passage, the practical impact on grading distributions and downstream evaluations remains uncertain pending implementation details and faculty compliance.

More from Economy

Trump Says He Will Discuss Iran with Xi in China Visit, But Says He Doesn’t Need Beijing’s Help May 12, 2026 U.S. Posts Reduced $215 Billion April Surplus as Refunds and Outlays Rise May 12, 2026 Bundesbank's Nagel Says Iran Conflict Could Force ECB to Raise Rates May 12, 2026 EIA Sees U.S. Electricity Use Climbing to New Highs Through 2027 May 12, 2026 Chicago Fed’s Goolsbee Flags Broadening Inflation, Cites Services as Main Concern May 12, 2026