Economy January 29, 2026

AI Build-Outs Drive Historic Capex, Markets Split on Costs vs. Future Gains

Microsoft and Meta’s divergent investor reactions underscore tension between heavy investment and near-term profit pressure amid a steadying Fed and volatile currencies

By Caleb Monroe
AI Build-Outs Drive Historic Capex, Markets Split on Costs vs. Future Gains

Microsoft and Meta reported massive increases in capital expenditures tied to artificial intelligence, prompting sharply different market responses. Microsoft’s near $38 billion quarterly capex and Meta’s raised plan for 2024 drew a $240 billion hit to Microsoft’s market value and a $140 billion gain for Meta. The Federal Reserve kept policy rates unchanged and signalled a relatively stable outlook, while currency moves, especially in the franc and euro, added another layer of market uncertainty. Several European and U.S. data points and central bank events are set to influence markets further.

Key Points

  • Microsoft reported nearly $38 billion in quarterly capital expenditure, up about two-thirds year-over-year, while Meta raised its 2024 capex plans by 73% to $115 billion - $135 billion.
  • Investors punished Microsoft’s stock, removing about $240 billion in market value, while Meta gained roughly $140 billion after upgrading its earnings outlook; Samsung Electronics saw operating profits triple amid chip market tightness.
  • The Federal Reserve held rates steady; Chair Powell described the economy as on a "solid footing" with a "clearly improving outlook," and said policy was only "somewhat restrictive" or "loosely neutral."

Corporate investment in artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping capital spending patterns, and investors are showing clear preferences about which balance sheets they trust to turn big bets into profit. The latest results from two of the largest technology companies revealed truly eye-catching spending: Microsoft disclosed capital expenditures of nearly $38 billion for the quarter, a rise of roughly two-thirds from a year earlier, while Meta raised its planned capital spending for the year by 73% to a range between $115 billion and $135 billion.

Despite similar narratives of heavy investment, investors reacted in markedly different ways. Market value of Microsoft fell by about $240 billion following the disclosure, a decline larger than the entire market capitalisation of Citigroup. Meta, by contrast, saw its market value climb by about $140 billion after it upgraded its earnings outlook, a move that appeared to reassure shareholders about the pay-off from higher spending.

Those moves highlight a fundamental market tension: one firm’s costs can become another firm’s revenues. For example, Samsung Electronics reported a trebling of operating profits, driven by stronger demand and higher prices for memory chips. What was once a low-interest segment of the semiconductor market became a source of outsized revenue when supplies tightened.

Central bank policy and economic commentary added another dimension to market behavior. The Federal Reserve left policy unchanged at its Wednesday meeting, an outcome widely anticipated, and Chair Jerome Powell’s post-meeting comments were notable for an upbeat tone. He said the economy was on a "solid footing" and described the outlook as "clearly improving." Powell also noted there was "broad support" on the committee for holding rates steady, aside from two members who voted for a cut.

In his remarks, Powell said the Fed had already done a lot of "normalising" to rates and assessed policy as only "somewhat restrictive," or even "loosely neutral." Markets interpreted that language as removing the prospect of an April rate cut, and pricing left June as the first likely cut with about a 61% probability in part because investors assume President Trump will have found a more dovish replacement as chair by then.

Powell declined to commit to a timetable for his own tenure, saying he would not be drawn on whether he would step down as a Fed governor in May or remain through 2028. When asked by a reporter why he might want to leave given perceived threats to Fed independence, he responded with a smile.

Currency markets showed pronounced movements despite official assurances. Treasury Secretary Bessent insisted the United States still follows a "strong dollar" policy, regardless of comments from the White House. Still, the dollar looked vulnerable in market trading, and European voices registered concern about the euro’s appreciation against the dollar. Some EU and ECB officials have murmured that a stronger euro could hurt exports and pose a downside risk for inflation.

Actual intervention by the European Central Bank appears unlikely, given its more reserved history. The Swiss National Bank, however, has greater precedent for stepping in, and the franc has been pushed up broadly as capital fled the dollar, appreciating even against the euro. The franc has broken below what market technicians regard as large chart support levels, a move that likely worries Swiss policymakers.

Intervention by the SNB can complicate global flows because it typically sells francs to buy euros, and then distributes some of those euros into dollars, sterling and other currencies. That pattern produces cross-currents across currency pairs and can add volatility to already stretched markets.

Market participants will be watching several scheduled releases and events that could move prices on Thursday, notably euro zone consumer confidence and business sentiment for January, a Riksbank policy meeting and remarks from ECB board member Piero Cipollone, and in the United States, November trade data plus weekly jobless claims.


Key developments to watch:

  • Euro zone consumer confidence and business sentiment for January
  • Riksbank policy meeting and remarks from ECB board member Piero Cipollone
  • U.S. November trade data and weekly jobless claims

Risks

  • Higher corporate spending may pressure near-term profits and investor sentiment in tech and related capital goods sectors, as seen by Microsoft’s market value decline - impacts: technology, capital equipment, chip suppliers.
  • Currency volatility, notably a stronger franc and euro against the dollar, could weigh on export-reliant sectors and complicate central bank responses, affecting financials and exporters.
  • Policy uncertainty around the Fed’s leadership timeline and investors’ expectations about rate cuts introduces risk to interest-rate sensitive markets, including bonds and interest-rate dependent equities.

More from Economy

House Prepares Vote to End Brief Partial Shutdown, Final Ballot Expected Tuesday Feb 2, 2026 France’s 2026 Budget Clears Parliament After Concessions, Targets 5% Deficit Feb 2, 2026 Cboe Holds Early Talks to Bring Binary Options Back to Retail Traders Feb 2, 2026 Administration to Build $12 Billion Critical Minerals Reserve to Shield U.S. Manufacturing Feb 2, 2026 Investors Pile Into Gold and Miner ETFs in January as Safety Demand Rises Feb 2, 2026