FSP March 10, 2026

Franklin Street Properties Corp. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call - Strategic Review Continues After Refinancing, Dividend Suspended

Summary

Franklin Street Properties reiterated that its May 2025 strategic review remains active under BofA Securities, and used this call to update investors on a recent refinancing and capital allocation moves rather than walk through quarterly results. On February 27, 2026 the company closed a $320 million secured credit facility with an affiliate of TPG Credit, repaying roughly $249 million of prior indebtedness, adding up to $45 million of delayed-draw capacity for leasing and building work, and extending the near-term maturity risk to February 26, 2029 with a possible one-year extension.

Management said the board has suspended the quarterly dividend to preserve about $4.1 million annually and will reassess that policy quarterly. The company flagged continued cost discipline after reducing G&A by $1.5 million in 2025, and framed its path forward around three priorities: boost leasing and occupancy, maintain financial flexibility, and keep exploring strategic alternatives. Management also laid out the wider headwinds in the office capital markets, noting transaction volumes have fallen from pre-pandemic norms and that a thinner, more opportunistic buyer base and tighter debt markets are driving pricing dynamics that can misread long-term asset economics.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic review remains active, initiated in May 2025, with BofA Securities advising the board on alternatives to maximize shareholder value.
  • Company used the call to update on strategic process and refinancing, not to revisit quarter or full-year operating and financial detail, which are in the press release and 10-K.
  • On February 27, 2026 FSP closed a $320 million secured credit facility with an affiliate of TPG Credit, replacing the prior syndicated credit line.
  • Borrowings from the new facility repaid approximately $249 million of outstanding indebtedness under the previous credit facility.
  • The new facility matures February 26, 2029, with a potential one-year extension exercisable by the company subject to conditions.
  • Facility includes up to $45 million of delayed-draw term loans earmarked for tenant improvements, leasing commissions, building improvements, and lender-approved uses, providing incremental leasing capital.
  • Refinancing resolved a near-term debt maturity that had been scheduled for April, removing an immediate capital structure constraint that could have complicated strategic negotiations.
  • The board suspended the quarterly dividend to preserve about $4.1 million annually, redeployable toward leasing and portfolio initiatives, and will reassess the dividend policy quarterly.
  • FSP reduced G&A by roughly $1.5 million in 2025, a 10% decline from $13.9 million in 2024 to $12.4 million in 2025, signaling cost discipline.
  • Board continues to evaluate a full slate of alternatives, including portfolio transactions, individual asset sales, joint ventures, corporate transactions, liquidation scenarios, and refinancing options, with no assurance on timing or outcome.
  • Management emphasized that the office capital markets remain impaired, with annual transaction volumes down from pre-pandemic averages of about $140-150 billion to roughly $80-90 billion today.
  • A smaller, more selective buyer pool now dominates office transactions, skewing toward opportunistic capital and private equity funds that demand higher returns and often transact with limited leverage.
  • Debt availability for office deals remains constrained, with lenders generally requiring lower leverage and additional structural protections, pushing some deals toward higher equity or distressed-situation pricing.
  • Distressed and lender-related transactions have depressed local pricing benchmarks, cited specifically in Denver’s CBD where recent capital-impaired sales traded well below historical replacement costs, and in Minneapolis where urban recovery and civic issues have slowed leasing and investor demand.
  • Management framed three operating priorities: improve leasing performance and occupancy, preserve financial flexibility and operational discipline post-refinancing, and continue the strategic review to explore value-enhancing opportunities.
  • Replacing a multi-lender syndicated group with a single institutional lender simplifies the capital structure, but concentrates counterparty exposure with a single debt provider experienced in real estate credit.
  • Management noted Janney has exited its equity research platform, reducing external research coverage available to investors.
  • FFO and other non-GAAP reconciliations are available in the company press release and 10-K, reiterating that detailed financial metrics were not the focus of this call.

Full Transcript

Tiffany, Conference Operator, Franklin Street Properties Corp.: Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Tiffany, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Franklin Street Properties Corp. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results. I will now turn the call over to Scott Carter, General Counsel. Scott, please go ahead.

Scott Carter, General Counsel, Franklin Street Properties Corp.: Good morning, and welcome to the Franklin Street Properties fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. Joining me this morning is George J. Carter, our Chief Executive Officer. Please note that various remarks that we may make about future expectations, plans, and prospects for the company may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as amended by our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, which are on file with the SEC. In addition, these forward-looking statements represent the company’s expectations only as of today, March 10, 2026.

While the company may elect to update these forward-looking statements, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. Any forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the company’s estimates or views as of any date subsequent to today. At times during this call, we may refer to funds from operations or FFO. Reconciliations of FFO and other non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP net income are contained in yesterday’s press release, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.fspreit.com. Now I will turn the call over to George J. Carter. George.

George J. Carter, Chief Executive Officer, Franklin Street Properties Corp.: Thank you, Scott. Good morning, and thank you all for joining us today. As many of you know, Franklin Street Properties has not been conducting traditional quarterly earnings calls over the past several quarters, given that the company continues to be engaged in an ongoing review of potential strategic alternatives under the advisory of BofA Securities. We have generally limited our public commentary to our written earnings releases and required SEC disclosures. However, we felt it would be helpful to provide investors with a little more color and a brief update, not on our quarterly or full-year financial and operating results. The written earnings press release and 10-K details that information well enough. Rather on our ongoing review of the company’s potential strategic alternative process, the recent refinancing of our debt, and the current transactional capital markets environment for office real estate investment.

As is customary during a strategic review process, today’s remarks will be relatively brief, and we will not be taking questions. In addition, Janney, which provided research coverage of FSP in prior years, has exited its capital markets business, including its equity research platform. I will start with a brief update of the company’s review of potential strategic alternatives, which we began in May 2025. Our board of directors continues to work closely with our financial advisor, BofA Securities, in evaluating potential strategic alternatives intended to try to maximize shareholder value. The alternatives the board has examined in depth have included portfolio level transactions, individual asset sales, joint venture structures, corporate level transactions, potential liquidation scenarios, and refinancing alternatives.

As we have disclosed previously, the refinancing of our credit facility that we completed recently was one such alternative evaluated as part of this process. The board remains actively engaged in evaluating opportunities and alternatives and continues to assess them carefully in light of evolving market conditions. The board’s objective throughout this process is straightforward, to evaluate alternatives that may maximize shareholder value while carefully considering current market conditions. The board remains committed to conducting this process in a disciplined manner and evaluating opportunities as market conditions evolve. As is customary with strategic reviews of this nature, no assurances can be provided regarding the outcome or timing of the process. As previously announced on February 27, 2026. The company closed a $320 million secured credit facility with an affiliate of TPG Credit.

Borrowings under this facility were used to repay in full the approximately $249 million of outstanding indebtedness under our prior credit facility. The new facility has an initial maturity of February 26, 2029, with the potential for an additional 1-year extension at the option of the company, subject to certain conditions. Importantly, the facility also includes up to $45 million of delayed draw term loans, which may be used to fund tenant improvements, leasing commissions, building improvements, and other uses approved by the lender. This refinancing accomplished several important objectives. First, it addressed our near-term debt maturity, which had been scheduled for April of this year. Second, it simplified our capital structure, replacing a large syndicated lending group that included multiple lenders with a single institutional lender that has significant experience in real estate and real estate credit markets.

Third, the additional leasing capital provides us with resources to continue executing our leasing strategy across the portfolio. Importantly, resolving this near-term debt maturity removes a source of uncertainty that could have complicated strategic discussions with potential counterparties. The company can now continue evaluating strategic alternatives without the pressure of an immediate capital structure constraint. The company is also announcing today that the board of directors has determined to suspend the payment of quarterly dividends. This was a thoughtful decision by the board intended to preserve capital and enhance financial flexibility. Suspending the dividend is expected to preserve approximately $4.1 million in cash annually, which can be redeployed into leasing efforts and other initiatives designed to enhance the value of our real estate portfolio. The board will reassess the dividend policy on a quarterly basis.

Additionally, disciplined cost management remains a priority for 2026 as we continue to evaluate strategic alternatives. In 2025, we reduced G&A by approximately $1.5 million, or about 10%, declining from $13.9 million in 2024 to $12.4 million in 2025. Beyond our company’s specific developments, we believe it is important to provide some perspective on the current transactional capital markets environment for office real estate. Over the past several years, the office sector has experienced a significant shift in capital market conditions driven by two primary factors. First, the rapid increase in interest rates beginning in 2022. Second, a meaningful reduction in institutional capital allocation to the office sector as many investors reassessed allocations to office. These forces have had a substantial impact on the transaction liquidity across the office market.

Importantly, reduced transaction liquidity does not necessarily eliminate asset value, but it can materially affect the ability of markets to reflect that value in observable transactions at a particular point in time. Prior to the pandemic, annual office transaction volume in the United States averaged approximately $140-$150 billion per year. In recent years, that figure has declined meaningfully. Today, national office transaction volume is running closer to $80-$90 billion annually, representing a substantial reduction in overall market liquidity. When transaction volumes decline to that degree, several dynamics emerge. The buyer pool becomes smaller and more selective. In addition, many traditional institutional investors that historically participated in the office sector have remained on the sidelines while reassessing long-term allocation strategies.

For the smaller pool of buyers that does exist, return expectations on office investments increase, and a higher proportion of transactions occur in distressed or capital-impaired situations. Another important dynamic affecting transaction activity today is debt availability for office assets. Financing for office transactions remains significantly more constrained than it was prior to 2022. Particularly for assets that are not fully stabilized. In many cases, lenders are requiring materially lower leverage levels or additional structural protections compared with prior cycles. As a result, many transactions today are being completed either with significant higher equity requirements or with opportunistic capital, which naturally leads to higher return thresholds and lower property pricing levels. In contrast, the traditional institutional buyer base that historically supported a large portion of office transaction volume often relied on financing markets that have not yet fully normalized.

Today’s buyer universe tends to consist primarily of opportunistic capital, private equity funds targeting higher IRR thresholds, and investors able to transact with limited leverage, which represents a materially different capital base than what historically supported the office market. Also, distressed transactions can exert a disproportionate influence on pricing benchmarks, particularly when overall transaction activity is limited. As a result, pricing in thin markets can sometimes reflect capital scarcity at that moment in time, rather than the long-term operating economics of the underlying real estate. We have seen these dynamics play out very clearly in certain FSP markets where distressed transactions have occurred. For example, in Denver’s CBD sub-market, several highly visible office transactions over the past two years have involved assets that were capital impaired or transferred through lender-related processes.

Those transactions have occurred at pricing levels significantly below historical replacement costs and prior market valuations, influencing broader market sentiment across the sub-market. Importantly, those situations often reflect capital structure challenges rather than underlying asset performance. In a lower liquidity environment, they can disproportionately influence pricing benchmarks across the market. In Minneapolis, the downtown office market has also faced several external challenges in recent years, including broader urban recovery issues following the pandemic and social and civic disruptions. Factors that have contributed to slower leasing velocity and reduced investor demand. While the broader market continues to show signs of stabilization, these kind of factors have contributed to slower leasing velocity and reduced investor demand, which in turn has affected transaction liquidity in the market. The markets in which Franklin Street Properties operates reflect many of these broader national dynamics.

Across markets such as Denver, Dallas, Houston, and Minneapolis, transaction activity has remained well below historical levels. At the same time, leasing markets in many of these regions have begun to show gradual signs of stabilization, particularly as companies continue to refine their return to office policies and long-term space requirements. Although leasing activity still remains below historical averages, these capital market conditions are an important part of the broader environment in which companies across the office sector are operating today. They influence the pace of transactions, the composition of the buyer universe, and the pricing dynamics that occur in the market. The FSP board and management remain committed to evaluating opportunities that may enhance and realize value for shareholders, while also understanding that any actions taken have to reflect the realities of the current capital markets environment.

The company remains open to pursuing transactions where market conditions allow values that we believe appropriately reflect the quality, location, and long-term economics of our assets. In closing, Franklin Street Properties remains focused on three priorities. First, continuing to improve leasing performance and occupancy across our portfolio. Second, maintaining financial flexibility and operational discipline, particularly following the successful refinancing of our credit facility. Third, continuing our review of strategic alternatives in order to explore opportunities that may increase shareholder value. We recognize that shareholders want progress and outcomes from this process, and we remain committed to evaluating all opportunities thoughtfully and responsibly as market conditions evolve. We remain focused on pursuing outcomes that reflect both the intrinsic value of our assets and the realities of the current capital markets environment. Thank you for joining us today and for your continued interest in Franklin Street Properties.

Tiffany, Conference Operator, Franklin Street Properties Corp.: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.