Alkermes Q1 2026 Earnings Call - Avadel Acquisition Drives Revenue Beat and Expands Orexin Pipeline

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Greetings, and welcome to the Alkermes first quarter 2026 financial results conference call. My name is Carrie, and I will be your operator for today’s call. All participant lines will be placed on mute to prevent background noise. If you should require operator assistance during the call, please press star 0 from your telephone keypad. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Sandy Coombs, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Affairs. Sandy, you may now begin.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Good morning. Welcome to the Alkermes plc conference call to discuss our financial results and business update for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. With me today are Richard Pops, our CEO, Joshua Reed, our Chief Financial Officer, Todd Nichols, our Chief Commercial Officer, and Blair Jackson, our Chief Operating Officer. A slide presentation along with our press release, related financial tables, and reconciliations of the GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures that we’ll discuss today are available on the Investors section of alkermes.com. We believe that non-GAAP financial results, in conjunction with the GAAP results, are useful in understanding the ongoing economics of our business. During the quarter, we closed the acquisition of Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc.

The financial results announced today reflect the mid-February closing of the transaction and the integration of Avadel into our business, including 6 weeks of contribution from LUMRYZ, Avadel’s once-at-bedtime sodium oxybate for the treatment of narcolepsy. Our discussions during this conference call will include forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Please see slide 2 of the accompanying presentation, our press release issued this morning, and our most recent annual report filed with the SEC for important risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise the information provided on this call or in the accompanying presentation as a result of new information or future results or developments.

After our prepared remarks, we’ll open the call for Q&A. Now I’ll turn the call over to Richard for some opening remarks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Thank you, Sandy. Good morning, everyone. We had an excellent financial first quarter with another strong period of commercial execution and business performance. The quarter was consequential in other ways. Perhaps most significantly, we completed the acquisition of Avadel, a key element of our strategy to become a leader in the sleep medicine space. With LUMRYZ, we add a new differentiated medicine to our portfolio, one that’s early in its commercial life and has significant potential for growth. LUMRYZ addresses a clearly defined patient need and fits logically into our portfolio, consistent with our focus on medicines delivering meaningful clinical benefit to patients. From a financial standpoint, the acquisition further enhances our financial growth and provides additional resources and flexibility to advance our development portfolio.

Beyond the financial consideration, the acquisition allows us to establish a commercial footprint in sleep medicine now, well in advance of the potential approval and launch of alixorexton. This early presence enables us to engage directly with sleep specialists and other key stakeholders critical to ensuring access to prescribed medications. Building these relationships now provides a strong foundation to accelerate our potential launch trajectory for alixorexton. Another consequential event occurred at the very end of the quarter with the announced entry of Eli Lilly into this therapeutic space. This is an important external validation of the breadth of the scientific and commercial potential in developing new medicines targeting the orexin pathway. I think it underscores important aspects of this emerging therapeutic class, namely the limited number of competitive entrants and the scarcity of available intellectual property around the chemistry, as well as the broad potential clinical and commercial opportunity.

It starts with diseases of hypersomnolence and extends beyond that to a range of potential conditions in neurology, psychiatry, and other rare diseases. For Alkermes, we believe alixorexton and our other development candidates represent substantial opportunities to advance patient care and drive significant value for shareholders. We have a clear strategy, and we’re well-positioned to advance these programs. Blair and I will provide an update on our development efforts at the end of the call. First, I’ll turn to Todd and Joshua to review our commercial and financial performance for the first quarter. Todd?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: Thank you, Rich. Good morning, everyone. I’m pleased to report that we’re off to a strong start to the year, with first quarter performance ahead of our expectations and solid execution across the commercial organization. It is exciting to note the evolution of our commercial team as our portfolio of commercial products expands. We now have commercial capabilities in three distinct categories: in addiction with VIVITROL, in psychiatry with ARISTADA and LYBALVI, and now, following the closing of the acquisition of Avadel, in sleep medicine with LUMRYZ. The integration of Avadel commercial team is progressing well. We entered the second quarter with a combined team fully in place. Looking ahead with clear strategic priorities, a seasoned commercial team, and a portfolio of important medicines in addiction, psychiatry, and sleep disorders, we are in a strong position to deliver on our performance goals for 2026.

Turning to our first quarter results. Net sales from our proprietary product portfolio increased 38% year-over-year to $338.1 million, reflecting solid demand across our psychiatry and addiction portfolios and certain favorable gross to net adjustments during the quarter and 6 weeks of commercial contribution from LUMRYZ. Starting with VIVITROL, net sales in the quarter were $112.4 million. VIVITROL performance continued to be driven by our ability to capitalize on highly localized market dynamics in certain states and payer systems. Looking ahead, we continue to expect VIVITROL net sales for 2026 in the range of $460 million-$480 million. For our psychiatry franchise, in the first quarter, net sales for the ARISTADA product family were $93.8 million, reflecting solid underlying demand.

In 2026, we continue to expect ARISTADA net sales in the range of $365 million-$385 million. LYBALVI net sales grew 32% year-over-year to $92.4 million. Underlying TRX growth was 21% year-over-year, driven by sustained momentum in new patient starts and continued expansion of prescriber breadth. Gross-to-net adjustments were approximately 33%, which we expect will continue to widen into the mid-30s during the course of the year as we continue to build on our market access profile. For the full year, we continue to expect LYBALVI net sales in the range of $380 million-$400 million. The first quarter results for these products benefited from gross-to-net favorability of approximately $14 million, driven primarily by favorable patient mix.

Approximately two-thirds of this favorability related to VIVITROL and the remainder related to ARISTADA and LYBALVI. Across the brands, inventory levels in the channel were relatively stable in the first quarter of 2026. As a result, we expect Q1 to Q2 growth trends to generally track end market demand. Turning to our sleep franchise. We are now 10 weeks post-close of the acquisition of Avadel. As we build on our commercial presence in this space, we are pleased with feedback from the sleep medicine community regarding the LUMRYZ commercial organization, the utility and expected durability of the sodium oxybate class, and the differentiation of LUMRYZ within this category. The LUMRYZ team is off to a strong start since joining Alkermes. For the first 6 weeks following the close of the acquisition in mid-February, we recorded LUMRYZ net sales of $39.5 million.

For the full quarter, Lumryz generated approximately $72 million of net revenue. We exited the quarter with approximately 3,600 patients on therapy and with solid momentum in new patient enrollments, which we expect to build on as we move through the year. For the full year, we expect Lumryz to generate total net sales in the range of $350 million-$370 million. Of this, we expect Alkermes to record $315 million-$335 million, reflecting the period since the mid-February, February close of the transaction. In sleep medicine, our near-term focus is on driving growth and executing against the Lumryz opportunity while advancing our broader strategy in this space, including preparation for the potential launch of alixorexton.

Narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia represent multi-billion dollar market opportunities, and our goal is to establish Alkermes as the leader in sleep medicine based on deep expertise in this disease area and differentiated and competitively positioned product portfolio. With solid performance from our established franchises and the recent addition of LUMRYZ, we are operating from a strong position of increasing scale and diversification. As we move forward, our focus remains on disciplined execution, driving demand across our brands, and advancing our strategy in psychiatry, addiction, and sleep medicine. The first quarter was a strong start to the year, and we are well-positioned as we work toward achieving our 2026 objectives. With that, I will pass the call to Joshua to review the financial results for the quarter.

Joshua Reed, Chief Financial Officer, Alkermes plc: Thank you, Todd. In the first quarter, we delivered financial results that reflect continued growth across our proprietary product portfolio and the initial contribution from LUMRYZ following the close of the Avadel acquisition. Post-acquisition, our financial profile is further enhanced and diversified. We do so now with increased scale and flexibility. We are in a strong position to invest in the expanding development pipeline that will shape the future of our business. Turning to our financial results. During the quarter, we generated total revenues of $392.9 million. These results provide a solid foundation for the year. Today, we are updating certain non-cash elements of our 2026 financial expectations to reflect refinements to the purchase price accounting for the acquisition of Avadel.

These adjustments improve our full year expectations for GAAP net loss and EBITDA. For our portfolio of proprietary products, we generated net sales of $338.1 million ahead of the expectations we outlined on our fourth quarter call. As we move into the second quarter, we expect Q2 net sales from our proprietary portfolio, including a full quarter of revenues from LUMRYZ, in the range of $385 million-$405 million. Manufacturing royalty revenues were $54.8 million for the quarter, including revenues of $27.3 million from VUMERITY and $18 million from the long-acting INVEGA product. Turning to expenses. Cost of goods sold were $61.6 million, which includes the purchase price accounting of LUMRYZ inventory. Recall that at closing, LUMRYZ’s inventory held by Avadel was marked to fair market value.

Net of the LUMRYZ’s inventory step-up charge, cost of goods sold would have been $48.9 million in Q1 of this year, compared to $49.2 million in Q1 of the prior year. In the second quarter, we expect COGS to be in the range of $85 million-$95 million, reflecting a full quarter of LUMRYZ sales and associated inventory step-up charge. R&D expenses in the quarter were $103.3 million, compared to $71.8 million in Q1 of the prior year, reflecting the initiation of the alixorexton Brilliance Phase III clinical program in narcolepsy, which began in the first quarter, the ongoing Vibrance-3 Phase II study of alixorexton in idiopathic hypersomnia, and the Phase I studies and development efforts for our next orexin 2 receptor agonist candidates, ALKS 7290 and ALKS 4510.

In the second quarter, we expect R&D expenses to be in the range of $110 million-$120 million. SG&A expenses were $264.6 million for the quarter, which included approximately $55 million of costs associated with the closing of the acquisition of Avadel, including transaction expenses and share-based compensation. Excluding these one-time expenses, SG&A would have been $209.4 million compared to $171.7 million in Q1 of last year, primarily reflecting the addition of the Avadel commercial infrastructure mid-quarter. As we look ahead to the second quarter, we expect SG&A expense to be in the range of $210 million-$220 million.

During the quarter, we also recorded amortization of intangibles of $11.7 million and net interest expense of $12.4 million. In Q1, we generated GAAP net loss of $66.5 million and EBITDA of -$30.1 million. We also generated positive adjusted EBITDA of $80.3 million, well ahead of our prior Q1 expectation of adjusted EBITDA of $30 million-$50 million due to higher-than-expected revenues and the timing of R&D expenses. Looking ahead to the second quarter, we expect adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $100 million-$120 million. Turning to our balance sheet. We ended the first quarter with approximately $538 million in cash and total investments.

To finance the acquisition of Avadel, we used approximately $775 million of cash from our balance sheet and then entered into term loans totaling $1.525 billion due in 2031. We expect to pay down this debt quickly with cash flows from the business. During the quarter, we also deployed $28 million to repurchase approximately 1 million shares at an average price of approximately $28 per share. We continue to have $172 million of remaining share repurchase authorization. As I mentioned, in connection with the purchase price accounting related to the Avadel acquisition, we have refined our expectations for several non-cash expense items, including the inventory step-up charge, which flows through cost of goods sold, and the amortization of intangible assets associated with LUMRYZ.

These changes have a net positive impact on our 2026 expectations for GAAP net loss in EBITDA. We now expect to expense approximately $105 million of LUMRYZ’s inventory fair value step-up in 2026, compared to a prior estimate of approximately $150 million. Our 2026 cost of goods sold is now expected to be $320 million-$340 million, an improvement from our prior estimate of $365 million-$385 million. For amortization of intangible assets, we now expect full-year amortization expense in the range of $75 million-$85 million, compared to our previous estimate of $95 million-$105 million.

For income tax, we now expect no income tax expense or benefit for the year from a prior estimate of an income tax benefit of $20 million. Taken together, these purchase price accounting adjustments improve our expectations for GAAP net loss, which is now projected to be in the range of $70 million-$90 million, as well as for EBITDA, which is now expected to be in the range of positive $105 million-$135 million. All other components of our 2026 outlook, including adjusted EBITDA, remain unchanged. Taking a step back, it was a strong start to the year, we look forward to carrying this momentum into the second quarter and beyond. With that, I’ll now hand the call back to Rich.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Thank you, Joshua. The commercial and financial elements of the business are strong. With expected revenue of more than $1.7 billion and adjusted EBITDA of more than $370 million, we have the financial resources to invest aggressively in our pipeline and generate significant cash flow. I think it’s becoming increasingly clear that our Orexin program has brought us to the threshold of substantial value creation. To date, we’ve developed and shared with you comprehensive clinical data sets across the first area of focus for this therapeutic class, disorders of hypersomnolence. That data set reflects the design and execution of a broad phase II program, randomized, controlled, multicenter, multi-week across multiple doses and indications using established clinical endpoints as well as additional measures such as fatigue and cognition that relate specifically to the brain circuitry that we’re activating.

At the same time, we’re broadening our development efforts beyond disorders of hypersomnolence, leveraging our portfolio of orexin-2 receptor agonist candidates. In this area, more than most, we believe that chemistry-based intellectual property represents an important strategic asset. Blair will speak in more detail about our expansion strategy and development plans. First, I want to update you on where we are with alixorexton. This year, our focus is on continuing the momentum we built in phase II to enroll the phase III BRILLIANT studies in narcolepsy. Phase III for us is all about execution. We’re on the path now to potential registration. The BRILLIANT phase III program is now open for enrollment in narcolepsy Type 1 and Type 2, with site initiation and patient screening underway. Because of the strength of the phase II results, investigator interest in the studies is strong.

We’re working to enroll these studies quickly with a sharp focus on quality and execution to support the strongest competitive positioning. From an operational perspective, the duration and scale of the Vibrance-2, the Vibrance phase II studies generated important and proprietary data that informed the design of our phase III program. With alixorexton, we’re building a broad and robust clinical data package across narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. In June, we’ll present data from the Vibrance-2 narcolepsy type 2 study at the annual sleep meeting in Baltimore. We’ve reported the positive top lines in November, much of the data set will be familiar to you. Along with the positive outcome of the study, Vibrance-2 is important because it’s one of a very small number of clinical studies ever conducted exclusively in patients with NT2.

As such, it provides a depth of insight into the characteristics and variability of this population that is largely absent from the existing literature. The sleep meeting gives us an opportunity to share the data with a broader sleep community. One-on-one engagements with clinicians and investigators over the last several months have already given us a clear sense of the treatment community’s high level of interest and excitement about these data. For idiopathic hypersomnia, or IH, our Vibrance-3 phase II study is ongoing and on track to be completed in the fourth quarter of this year. We’ve initiated enrollment of a split-dose cohort of approximately 30 patients across sites in both U.S. and Europe, with patients randomized to alixorexton or a matching split-dose placebo.

As a reminder, in IH, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale are the established and preferred clinical and regulatory endpoints. In addition to those measures, Vibrance-3 also includes mean sleep latency assessed by the maintenance and wakefulness test, which will help us to characterize the durability of wakefulness over the course of the day. The clinical development program for alixorexton has been deliberately designed to support strong competitive positioning, both in the quality of the clinical data generated and the breadth of potential dosing options and regimens being evaluated to address individual patient needs. We believe this approach positions alixorexton, if approved, to become the orexin of choice across both narcolepsy indications. Importantly, alixorexton has the potential to be the first in class in narcolepsy type 2, and our lead in development in NT2 continues to widen.

In the meantime, while the orexin development story in narcolepsy continues to mature, with LUMRYZ, we now have an important new medicine being used in current clinical practice. Later this quarter, we expect to announce top-line data from the LUMRYZ phase III REVITALYZ study in IH. Data from this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study, which enrolled approximately 150 patients, would serve as the basis for an sNDA submission with a potential launch in early 2028 if approved. This represents a potential growth opportunity for LUMRYZ in an underserved patient population, and we’ll look forward to data this quarter. Now I’ll turn the call over to Blair to provide an update on our expanding development work in our orexin portfolio. Beyond central disorders of hypersomnolence, there are many adjacent disease areas that may benefit from modulating the orexin pathway.

We identified this opportunity early on, and we’re moving aggressively with new molecules. Go ahead, Blair.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Thank you, Rich. As we outlined earlier in January, this year we are expanding our orexin development programs into disease areas outside of sleep medicine. We are doing so with 2 new molecules from our portfolio, ALKS 7290 and ALKS 4510. Each of these orexin 2 receptor agonists has been advancing through single and multiple ascending dose cohorts in healthy volunteers, and we’re pleased with the profiles we have observed to date. This year, our development plans take us into patient populations in ADHD and fatigue. Early on, based on our emerging data and feedback from clinical investigators, we identified attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as one of the most compelling initial opportunities for orexin 2 receptor agonists outside of sleep medicine. ADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent difficulty in maintaining attention and concentration and is frequently accompanied by hyperactive and impulsive behavior.

Despite the availability of some treatment options, many patients continue to experience residual symptoms, functional impairment, tolerability issues, and adherence challenges even when receiving current standard of care treatment. Against that backdrop, Alkermes is working to advance the evidence base supporting the potential use of orexin 2 receptor agonists in ADHD. We have established a foundation of data from validated preclinical behavioral models, assessment of neurotransmitters, and human EEG that support our conviction in this program. Based on this foundation, we are initiating our first clinical studies of ALKS 7290 in adults with ADHD this year. The first is a phase I-B randomized placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study designed to enroll approximately 50 adult patients. Participants will receive 2 weeks of treatment with ALKS 7290 or placebo.

In this study, we will assess the safety and tolerability of ALKS 7290 along with the effects of treatment on translational measures where we expect to see more rapid changes, including quantitative EEG and certain neuropsychological performance measures. These assessments are designed to evaluate sustained attention, vigilance, and impulse control in a shorter duration study. For exploratory purposes, we’ll also assess changes from baseline on established clinical ADHD scales. Results from this phase I-B study are expected in the fourth quarter of this year, and we will provide the first clinical data generated with the orexin 2 receptor agonist in patients with ADHD. Enrollment in that study is already underway, with the first patients dosed in April. As enrollment in the phase I-B study progresses, we plan to initiate a well-powered phase II study in adult patients with ADHD this summer.

This randomized double-blind study is expected to enroll approximately 300 patients and will evaluate ALKS 7290 versus placebo over a 4-week treatment period. The primary endpoint will be change from baseline on the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale. Data from this study, which we expect to complete in 2027, may serve as the foundation to advance to a potential registrational program in ADHD. We are excited to be the leaders in this exciting area of clinical development. We look forward to updating you on our progress. For ALKS 4510, we are advancing in single and multiple ascending dose studies in healthy volunteers and plan to initiate a multi-dose phase IIa study later this year in patients with fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. Fatigue is one of the most common and burdensome symptoms in neurodegenerative disorders and remains a significant unmet need in MS and Parkinson’s.

Our interest in fatigue in these populations is also informed by observations from our phase II narcolepsy studies, where we saw improvements in patient-reported fatigue that appeared distinct from effects on sleepiness or wakefulness alone. Fatigue represents a novel area of pharmaceutical development, and we’ll provide more details regarding the design of the development program as the phase II study opens later this year. As we advance through the development program, our strategy will be stepwise, data-driven, and informed by interactions with regulatory authorities as we seek to make a meaningful contribution to patient care. Taking a step back, the potential utility of orexin 2 receptor agonists across a broad range of indications is a significant and striking opportunity. This will be the year that we generate a substantial new increment of data to the clinical evidence base supporting these potential opportunities.

With that, I’ll turn the call back to Sandy to manage the Q&A.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Thanks, Blair. We’ll now open the call for Q&A.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question will come from David Amsellem with Piper Sandler.

David Amsellem, Analyst, Piper Sandler: Thanks. On the orexin programs beyond sleep-wake in ADHD, can you talk about your thought process regarding development as monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy in ADHD and how you’re what preclinical data you can point to that gives you confidence that a monotherapy approach makes sense? Regarding the fatigue program, might be a little early to talk to this, but can you talk about endpoints that you’re exploring? I realize this is going to be informed by your discussions with regulators, but what are you going to be looking at in terms of early outcome measures on fatigue? Thanks.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Sure. Hey, David, it’s Blair. With regards to ADHD, we have a substantive amount of data with regards to orexin agonists in this space. In fact, it’s probably the most tangential of the indications out there for the next place for us to go. We did a lot of preclinical work looking at neurotransmitter release, looking at behavioral models, EEG. We saw, you know, increased levels of acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex, which is a high indication of activity and attentiveness. We also used what’s really a highly translatable model within the preclinical testing where it’s called the five-choice serial reaction time task. Our initial hypothesis was exactly where you started, was what if we did an adjunctive therapy perhaps with a non-stimulant? Would that provide a really beneficial outcome?

When we did that model, what we found is across all our studies, we were performing as well as or better than stimulants themselves as a monotherapy. We feel that, both in the attention and the impulsivity aspects of those programs that we have a really good opportunity here. Our clinical studies that we’re kicking off are actually designed to look at just that. We’ll be looking at monotherapy across a broad population, both in attention and impulsivity. I think the two studies that we’ve set up are gonna be really, really well-positioned to give us a full idea of how this could proceed moving forward. With regards to fatigue and that program, we’re moving into the clinic with a drug called ALKS 4510.

That’s a really interesting area, and we are looking very carefully at the scales to be used within those studies. We’re gonna be testing this in MS fatigue patients and Parkinson’s disease patients. One scale that we’re gonna use is the PROMIS Fatigue Scale. This is a scale that we used in our NT1 study, where we showed a really strong benefit within the NT1 patients, taking them really from severe to normal on that scale. That’s hasn’t been shown very widely within clinical literature. We also saw similar outcomes as we moved into the NT2 patient population, that bodes well as we go to an intact orexin tone system.

The other thing to keep in mind is a lot of these disease areas, they also have their own scales that have been developed as part of that patient population. We’re gonna be testing those too and trying to understand best how the different characteristics of the scales work and also how these drugs perform within different subcategories of fatigue.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Thanks, David.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Our next question will come from Umer Raffat with Evercore ISI.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo5: Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I have a two-part question. Clearly there’s been a ton of interest, strategic interest in the orexin space, and what I’m wondering is twofold. Number one, can you lay out timelines for indications beyond narcolepsy? I feel like that aspect of the value has not been captured by much of the valuation numbers that have been thrown around so far. I ask that in particular because it seems like Lilly’s early interest in Centessa was perhaps not even on the lead program. Number two, more importantly, is Alkermes and the board open to the idea of asset sale rather than a whole company sale if that were to be a possibility at any point? I’m thinking back to examples like Biohaven. Thank you very much.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: You know, Umer, maybe I’ll start, and then I’ll hand it over to Blair as well. Yeah, I think Blair just referred to it in the prepared comments, which is the two most immediate adjacencies to the hypersomnolence are fatigue and ADHD. We’re enrolling patients right now in the first ADHD study, that translational study in adult patients. That’ll be a 50-patient study. We’ll get data this year on ADHD to give us our first sense. We won’t even wait for those data before we light off a bigger proper phase II program, which we’ll light off this summer in ADHD because we feel like the preclinical evidence in that space is quite compelling. The enrollment in the fatigue studies in Parkinson’s and whatever, MS, that starts this year as well.

We’re right on the threshold of new data sets that expand the understanding of the pharmacology in patients without demonstrable orexin deficits. As you know, the first hints of that come from our NT2 data and our IH data that we’ve already developed. With regard to the second question, you know, our company and our board, you know, we’re a public company, we react to whatever circumstance present themselves. We feel like right now we’re right on the threshold of major valuation changes as we mature this program. I think Lilly coming into the market underscores the fact that there’s more than just hypersomnolence here at play. This circuitry is directly associated with human wakefulness defined broadly, and I think that opens up a whole bunch of adjacencies.

We start with hypersomnolence, and we go from there. Blair, any other thoughts?

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: No, I just reiterate what Rich said, which is we’re in a process right now. We’re gonna be turning over a lot of cards with regards to a number of these clinical areas, and we’re looking to really execute and drive value over the next, you know, next couple years. I think it’s a little premature to talk about any potential sale process.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo5: Thank you very much.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Moving next to Paul Matteis with Stifel.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo8: Hey, this is Julian on for Paul. Thanks so much for taking our questions. I guess just to piggyback again on the orexin program and the pipeline, it would be great to hear about for this larger phase II that you’re kicking off this summer, what types of patients are you hoping to enroll? Can you just talk a little bit about the translatability of what you’d expect based on, you know, past clinical data literature in terms of success on the primary endpoint and how may that translate to a larger randomized phase III? I guess in comparison, how large are phase III studies, relative to the phase II that you plan on kicking off? Thanks.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Yeah. Thanks for the question. I think with regards to the ADHD, as we said, as I said earlier in the call, we saw pretty broad activity in some of our early models with regards to this asset and this mechanism. As we look to enroll our patients in the phase II study, we think a broad base of patients will be beneficial from this. We’re not gonna look at individual subtypes. Our key primary endpoint for this is the AISRS, which is the adult, the adult tool that’s been used widely in industry. What we’re really looking to do is see the relative effect size across the patient population.

You know, just to give an idea of what people have seen in the past, there’s typically it kind of breaks into two main areas. You typically see the non-stimulants, they typically have, you know, Cohen’s d effect sizes that are kind of 0.3 to 0.45 or so. What you see is a very different result with stimulants. Stimulants typically can be 1 and above with regards to Cohen’s d, it comes with trade-offs. What we’re really looking to see is how we perform on that over a 4-week period. That study, as we said in the prepared remarks, is gonna be about 300 patients. That’s roughly the size that you see in some of the phase III programs.

You go a little longer. Usually, you’re looking at six-plus weeks on the primary endpoint. We’ll determine that, and we’ll indicate more of that after we see the data in the phase II.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: I just wanna add a couple things on that. Number 1, what we did in narcolepsy is what we wanna do in ADHD, i.e., have a significant amount of clinical data before we launch the phase III program and run a phase II program that almost mimics a phase III program. That’s a major risk mitigator in the program. Second thing is we’re gonna start using the tools that exist, just like we did in narcolepsy. What’s interesting about this pathway is that it’s activating the brain in different ways than a stimulant activates the brain. I think with the benefit of additional clinical data, we’ll be able to dial into some of the differential efficacy potential of an orexin agonist compared to just a stimulus, which is revving up the brain in a more general way.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo8: Thanks so much. Sorry, just one quick question, if I may as well. I think you said you’d be completing the IH study in 4Q, Rich. Are we expecting data this year, or could it potentially run into next year? Thanks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: That’s the translational study, the first study where we’re looking at more.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: IH.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Oh, I’m sorry.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: IH.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: IH. I’m sorry. Yeah, the IH orexin study, we’ll complete that in Q4, and we’ll get the data as fast as we can thereafter. It could be right at the end of the quarter or right at the beginning of the second quarter, according to the current plan of the first-

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo8: Thanks for the clarification.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Moving next to Jessica Fye with JPMorgan.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just a question on LUMRYZ and your guidance for that product this year. Can you just talk about what’s embedded as it relates to your expectation for any potential net price pressure as non-AG generic sodium oxybate, you know, gains traction in the marketplace?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: Yeah. Yeah, sure. I’ll take that one. At this point right now, as I stated, we’re guiding to $350-$370. We had a really solid first quarter. We feel really good about that heading into Q2 and for the remainder of the year. At this point, we haven’t seen any impact on multi-source generics for XYREM. Again, the most important point is this is a multi-source generic for XYREM, not for LUMRYZ. We haven’t seen any impact on demand, any impact on physician behavior, any change in payer behavior at this point. A really solid part about the LUMRYZ story is really the diverse patient mix. We get a sizable portion of patients from new oxybate, from returning oxybate, and from the switch markets. It’s a very durable product.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: It’s something that we’re watching very closely. We’ll have to see how it plays out. With our full year guide, we do incorporate a range of gross to net scenarios.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Very clear. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Our next question will come from Ben Burnett with Wells Fargo.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Hey, thanks very much. I wanted to ask about the Vibrance-3 data that you will provide in the fourth quarter or thereabouts. I guess, what dose cohorts will be included in the update? Will this include split dosing at therapeutically relevant doses?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Yes. We expect to have top-line results from the entire study, when we read out the data from that, which would include the split dose arm.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Okay. Fantastic. Can I ask, the split dosing that’s being tested, how is that split? Are they evenly split? Are you testing sort of higher total doses in the split dosing cohorts relative to the single dose cohorts?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Yeah, we haven’t disclosed the specifics on the split dose strategy either for the IH study or for the other studies as well, partly because we feel like we’ve learned so much from our clinical program that is proprietary that we’re gonna keep that close to our vest until we have the data.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Understood. Okay, thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: You’re welcome.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: We’ll go next to Marc Goodman with Leerink Partners.

Marc Goodman, Analyst, Leerink Partners: Yes. On LUMRYZ, can you talk about the net patient starts that got you through the 3,600 patients that ended the quarter? Now that you own the asset, can you give us an update of how you plan to develop valdecoxib? Thanks.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Yeah. Hey, Marc. I’ll take the first part of that. overall, as I said in my prepared remarks, the brand in Q1 realized 3,600 patients on therapy. We actually think that total patients on therapy is the best metric. That’s a 28%

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: Year-over-year growth, overall. That’s the durable part of the brand. That really incorporates any type of demand perspective, access, and also persistency. Our focus is really on total patients. We’re always gonna be focused moving forward on growing net patient adds, and we feel really good about, you know, the enrollment trends we saw coming at the end of the quarter, which is gonna set us up very well for Q2 and beyond. That’s, you know, that’s really based upon just the overall strength of the mix between new-to-Oxybate switch and also, returning. We feel good about the patient mix that we’re seeing.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Hey, Marc, this is Blair. I’ll take the valdecoxib question. That’s an asset that came over as part of the Avadel acquisition, and that’s an opportunity for us to potentially develop a no assault once nightly product for patients. Our plan for that is to take multiple formulations into the clinic and really try to assess a rapid development program. This is really right up our wheelhouse. As you know, we’re a formulation company at our roots, and especially when it comes to PK/PD relationships. We right now have multiple formulations that are in the clinic and being assessed. As we have more data later in the year, we’ll share that.

Marc Goodman, Analyst, Leerink Partners: Blair, do you think you’re gonna have to do a full, like, a full phase III study? Or will you be able to do, like, some type of bridging study that is quicker?

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: That’ll really depend on the clinical data that we generate. Our hope is that we can do some bridging, again, we’ll have to see how this asset performs in the clinic.

Marc Goodman, Analyst, Leerink Partners: Thanks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Rudy Li with Wolfe Research has our next question.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo2: Thanks for taking my question. Can you talk about your current understanding of the competitive landscape for orexin agonist? Specifically, what key endpoints being measured in your Brilliance phase III trial that could provide additional label differentiation? Thanks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: I think the major differentiating feature in the orexin space now is the fact that Alkermes has the only program that has a range of doses that have been credentialed in large randomized phase II studies. In so doing, we’ve been able to explore other domains other than just the classic Maintenance of Wakefulness Test and the cataplexy scale by extending into fatigue and cognition. While we don’t expect fatigue and cognition data to be in our initial label, what we do expect is to have a clinical data set that encompasses all those features of the treatment.

When we come to market, if the drug is approved, we expect to come to market for NT1 and NT2, which differentiates us from the first market entrant, as well as a range of doses across NT1 and NT2, both as once a day as well as in split dose formats, which further differentiates us from the first market entrant. I think following the acquisition of Centessa, I think our lead in NT2 as well as NT1 continues to grow. We’re really happy with the competitive positioning, and we think this is gonna open up the beginning of a brand-new class of pharmaceuticals that will continue to grow from the diseases of hypersomnolence.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo2: Got it. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: We’ll go next to Luke Herrmann with Baird.

Luke Herrmann, Analyst, Baird: Hi, team. Thanks for the question. 1 on 7290 and ADHD. You laid out the effect sizes we’ve seen across different standards of care. Based on the preclinical data, do you think the more likely outcome as a monotherapy is sort of a more tolerable asset that sits in the middle of stimulants and non-stimulants in terms of efficacy? Or do you think efficacy could actually exceed what we’ve seen with stimulants?

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Well, again, what we’ve seen in our preclinical data is, we performed as well or better than stimulants in our early models as monotherapy. Obviously, if we’re able to achieve that clinically with the tolerability profile that we see with this class of drugs, that’s a great outcome for us. I think there’s a wide range of market opportunities regardless of what we see in the clinic. Our goal will be to get the strongest efficacy possible.

Luke Herrmann, Analyst, Baird: Great. Just one follow-up on the alixorexton phase III studies. I believe you commented on the high level of patient interest. Has this exceeded what you anticipated, and would this maybe lead to a more expeditious enrollment?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: You know, the difference between phase III and phase II for us is that when you go into phase II, no one’s used your drug before. Now we go into phase III with a major data set that’s been presented in major meetings and a buzz about this program. What mitigates against the rate of enrollment, though, is the control and the rigor that we learn from phase II about which sites to use and how to select patients and how to make sure that you’re not just enrolling for the sake of enrollment numbers, but to enroll the finest cohort you can over the period. Those data become your label. The quality of that study is sacrosanct.

We expect to enroll the study correctly at the rate that we’ll determine as we activate sites, and we’ll keep you guys posted as we go on that.

Luke Herrmann, Analyst, Baird: Great. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: We’ll hear next from Joseph Thome with TD Cowen.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo9: Hello, this is Jacob on for Joe. Thanks for taking my question. I was wondering if you were planning on studying LUMRYZ in combination with an OX2R agonist in the future. If so, what would a trial for that look like?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Yeah, Jacob, it’s something we’re hearing so frequently from clinicians now that we’ve completed the acquisition. We’ll go to the sleep meeting in Baltimore representing once-nightly oxybate with extended efficacy as well as the alixorexton program. We will be harnessing that energy into a clinical program over time. We’re not gonna start that right away. We need to finish some other things first, namely the registration program for alixorexton as monotherapy. I think there’s increasing interest in understanding both the nighttime and the daytime aspects of the disease.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: Great. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Go next to Ami Fadia with Needham & Company.

Ami Fadia, Analyst, Needham & Company: Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I’ve got 2. Just with regards to Vibrance-2, that’s going to be presented at the sleep meeting in Baltimore, what additional data, on top of what you’d announced at the initial data readout, that we can expect at the meeting? With regards to the LUMRYZ IH study, that’s expected to read out in the second quarter, maybe talk about your expectations for what that profile is likely to look like, the market opportunity and, what you’re doing in terms of, preparing for a potential launch of that indication. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Ami, it’s Rich. I’ll start. As I mentioned, we presented most all of the data on the Vibrance-2 study in November, and that’s available on the website if people wanna look at that again. We will give a bit more at sleep in 2 principal domains. One, we’ll try to give a little bit more dimensionality to the efficacy effect that we saw. The other is we do have data from the extension phase now that we can tack on to the double-blind phase, and that’s always instructive to see what happens as patients stay on therapy for a longer period of time. Of course, at the sleep meetings, those data are presented by investigators, and you have the ability to talk to people who actually have hands-on in the use of the drug.

Your second question was about LUMRYZ in IH and the market opportunity for that. I’ll start, and then I’ll ask Todd to comment on that. What’s interesting is that the competitive product is XYWAV. The principal growth of that drug now is driven by the IH indication. Part of the reason we went into IH for alixorexton was as talking to patients and patient advocacy groups, there’s a huge unmet need for new medicines in IH. We just had a thought leader here at the company yesterday saying that he thought oxybates at this moment were probably the best treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia, which is interesting, and I think that’s underappreciated. We will be able to enter this market with LUMRYZ in 2028.

We have some time to, you know, prepare for that type of a launch if it’s approvable. We’re quite excited about that as a lifecycle, growth tool for LUMRYZ. Todd, you have any thoughts?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: Yeah. I would just add a couple of things. We continue just to validate all of the research that we’ve done, listening to the community, listening to HCP. We believe it’s a really underdeveloped category right now. There’s 40,000 patients that are diagnosed. We think that’s underrepresented, there’s only one FDA-approved product on the market. We think that LUMRYZ has an opportunity to be the second product, and we know how well LUMRYZ is received in the community now for narcolepsy, so our expectations are very high on what the opportunity is for LUMRYZ and IH. As Rich said, as the data is presented, as we go through the approval process, we’ll be continuing to build what our launch plan looks like, but it’s something that we are very excited about.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: We’ll go next to Jason Gerberry with Bank of America.

Chi-Yong (for Jason Gerberry), Analyst, Bank of America: Hey, good morning. This is Chi-Yong for Jason. Thanks for taking our question. I guess on ADHD, can you talk about what’s unique about the molecule PK or dosing profile that could help you mitigate insomnia or urinary frequency, the class of adverse class adverse events you have observed in narcolepsy patients? Would you expect the ADHD patients to be more or less sensitive to these class AE so far? Just a quick follow-up on Vibrance-2. Would you provide any sort of kinetics on weekly MWT data to better contextualize data comparison relative to a key competitor of yours which had 2-week data, and you’ve talked about observation of tachyphylaxis in the past with Vibrance-2. Thanks.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: All right, Chi. It’s Blair. I’ll start with the ADHD, then I’ll get Rich to answer you on the Vibrance-2 stuff. With regards to ADHD, I think a couple of things I wanna make sure we’re clear on. One is the adverse events that we typically see with this class of orexin agonist. It’s a very wide therapeutic window. As you saw from our programs in NT1 and NT2, we have a really nice AE profile overall. The main effects associated with this class are polyuria and some transient insomnia that we see at the beginning of the study.

As we talk about the ADHD program and the PK dosing profile, I think with regards to any of the new programs that we move outside of narcolepsy, we’re developing them with new drugs. ALKS 7290 is its own unique molecule. It’s been designed by itself specifically. It’s optimized for the patient populations that we’re going after. It’ll have its own unique PK and dosing profile that will match that patient population. As you know, what we saw in our NT2 program is that patients who have an intact orexin system, who have natural orexin tone, we tend to see a very mitigated overall AE profile due to that fact. Again, I think we’re well-positioned to test a wide range of doses within that patient class.

Rich, do you wanna do?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Yeah, the Vibrance-2 data at Sleep, you will see time course data on a multi-week basis for the ESS score. I just wanna make the point that there is no competitive data that’s been presented so far. There’s only one company that’s shown multi-week successful data in NT2, and that’s Alkermes.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: We’ll hear next from Akash Tewari with Jefferies.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo6: Hi, this is Anastasia in for Akash. Thanks for taking the question. When you’ve previously talked about NT2, you’ve kind of segmented the pop into a couple buckets of patients. You have the ones who would benefit from BID dosing, and the ones with kind of a more modest effect size. How are you thinking about that dynamic as you consider orexins working in other indications where patients have more normal hypocretin levels at baseline, like, you know, ADHD or fatigue?

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: We just think overall dosing flexibility will be a really important thing because people have different physiologic set points for their base orexin tone, and they have different lifestyle expectations, whether they want to stay up till 10:00 P.M. or they want to go to bed at 7:00 P.M. Our feeling is that we’ve established in data so far in NT2 patients as well as IH in an early stage, that patients with normal orexin tones can benefit from an orexin agonist. That degree of that benefit will be determined by each individual’s set point, as I just described.

The prerequisite for addressing that commercially is just a range of doses with data supporting that range of doses in the label, which is exactly why we’ve designed the pivotal study, the Brilliance study to include once daily dosing, split dosing across that range of doses that we elaborated in phase II.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Moving next to Ashwani Verma with UBS.

Hoyon Ahn (for Ashwani Verma), Analyst, UBS: Hi, this is Hoyon Ahn for Ash. Thanks for taking our questions. Our first question is for the pending LUMRYZ IH study. How do you think about the placebo arm here, given the patients may have some bias knowing that sodium oxybate works in IH? Our second question is, it’s good to see the decent beat on VIVITROL. Can you help us understand your latest thoughts on how the VIVITROL revenue trajectory could be in 2027 and beyond as Teva’s generic enters? Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: I’ll take the first, and Blair and Todd talk about the second. Just understanding that LUMRYZ IH phase III study is a randomized withdrawal study. Patients would have all been on the sodium oxybate. They’ll know there’s no blinding issue, and then it’s withdrawn on a blinded basis. This is the same design that Jazz Pharmaceuticals used with their XYWAV study.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: I think with regards to VIVITROL, as we move into 2027, there’s a number of interesting scenarios in front of us. Obviously, we have the potential entrant of Teva into the space in the beginning of 2027. We’re looking at a lot of scenarios related to that, including some scenarios where Teva actually isn’t able to make it into market. What we don’t expect, though, is to have a really dramatic impact on VIVITROL as the new entrant comes into the place. VIVITROL is a unique asset. It requires a lot of manufacturing capability. It requires a lot of commercial infrastructure and hand-holding with patients and physicians. Todd can give you a little more on that.

Yeah, absolutely. Just to kind of reiterate, we have really 2 key priorities right now, and that’s delivering for 2026 for VIVITROL. We’re right on track to be in the range of our full-year guidance, really driven by the alcohol dependence indication. To reinforce what Blair said, we’ve been working on this for a number of years. We have a range of scenarios that we’re playing through, our research continues to reinforce that we don’t see this as a typical erosion if Teva were to make it into the market. It’s a durable product. We’ll be prepared regardless of what those scenarios are to flex our resources if we need to and also be prepared to compete.

Hoyon Ahn (for Ashwani Verma), Analyst, UBS: I see. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Our next question will come from Umer Raffat with Mizuho Securities.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo7: Guys, yeah, thanks for taking our questions. Maybe, apologies for missing as I dialed in a little bit late. Could you maybe just help us understand if there’s a reason for or not on why the patient mix may change going through the year given the nice patient mix that led to better than expected gross in that? The second question is, on ADHD, is there anything else in terms of potential differentiation other than efficacy? Thanks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: I’ll take the first one, regarding patient mix. Patient mix. We did see some favorability, some Medicaid favorability in the first quarter of the year. We don’t actually forecast on favorable patient mix. We do expect that for the full year that we would see the access profile for LYBALVI expand, so we do have better line of sight to what that profile would look like. We’re always in active negotiations with payers. Our full year range actually assumes

That could play through. You know, that’s the real logistics of the business right now. We’re just not forecasting any additional favorability for the remainder of the year.

Blair Jackson, Chief Operating Officer, Alkermes plc: With regards to ADHD, look, we’re looking for differentiation both on efficacy and tolerability. I think if you look at the ADHD market and how it’s evolved, it really was started around the stimulants and the amphetamine use within adults and children. That comes with significant trade-offs. It comes with side effects. It comes with potential abuse. I think people have been really looking for more tolerable agents that are maybe non-stimulant for a long time. Up until now, really the efficacy of those agents really just hasn’t matched what you’ve seen on the stimulant class.

I think, the really holy grail for this indication in this area is to create an asset that has the efficacy of a VYVANSE or something like that, but also is really well tolerable. The orexin agonist class has the potential for that. It’s a new mechanism of action. It operates on the alertness centers in the brain. We’ve seen attention and impulsivity benefits in preclinical models. We’ve seen the right neurotransmitter release and profile as we look at these assets. We think there’s a real opportunity here to really thread that needle and provide a new benefit to this patient population.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Okay, thanks.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Our final question will come from David Hong with Deutsche Bank.

David Hong, Analyst, Deutsche Bank: Hi there. Thanks for fitting me in and taking my questions. I just had two. Maybe first with the Vibrance-3 IH study. When we do get that data for the split dosing arm, I guess ideally, what would you like to see for that split dose versus a single dose to help, you know, validate your hypothesis? I guess, do you just have any sense of, in the real world setting, if a split dose or a single dose would be preferred? On the LUMRYZ opportunity in IH, if LUMRYZ is approved for IH, how do you think about where your patients may come from? Do you think that would be mostly oxybate naive in IH?

Would you think that there’d be a good proportion of switches from XYWAV as well? Thanks a lot.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo1: Hey, David, it’s Rich. I’ll take the first. The hypothesis for the split dose in IH is driven by the observations that we saw in the NT2 study. The simple readout would be to look at the MWT and see whether we’re extending the later time points and elevating the latencies of the later time points. Recognizing that it’s almost a laboratory measure that we’re using in the IH population because the MWT is not a preferred endpoint for IH. It’s simply a way for us to demonstrate the pharmacodynamic effect of the split dose and to confirm our dosing assumptions. In the real world, you know, we’ve talked to a lot of different folks in the course of market research.

I think that the once daily will continue to be probably the modal approach that patients use. Over time, as the category continues to mature, I think we analogize it to the ADHD space, where there’s a whole range of dosing alternatives, and people can tailor their dose to their lifestyle. That’s why we think there will be real virtue to having a suite of once daily doses as well as accompanying split doses that people can then dial in to the level of wakefulness that matches their lifestyle and their disease.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo4: Yeah. In terms of the IH opportunity for LUMRYZ, you know, we clearly see a high unmet need here. We think there’s a significant opportunity for expansion potential because we think that the market right now is very modest. Even with the one product approved, there’s only very modest penetration. We see market expansion opportunity, which will be a new patient start opportunity that LUMRYZ will have the ability to tap into. That’s what we’ve seen with narcolepsy. At the same time, it’s also going to create another market, which is a switch market, and that’s what we’ve seen with narcolepsy. We think that it will mimic kind of the patient patterns that we’ve seen in narcolepsy, which is new to oxybate patients, switched patients, and returning patients.

David Hong, Analyst, Deutsche Bank: Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: This now concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Sandy Coombs for closing comments.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo3: Great. Thank you everyone for joining us on the call today. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to us at the company if we can be further helpful. Thank you.

Ben Burnett, Analyst, Wells Fargo0: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.