Cryptocurrency February 2, 2026

Orokai Research Outlines How Non-Custodial DeFi Is Used and What Still Limits Uptake

Study points to operational complexity and fragmentation as chief obstacles, while aggregation layers aim to simplify access without taking custody of user assets

By Derek Hwang
Orokai Research Outlines How Non-Custodial DeFi Is Used and What Still Limits Uptake

Orokai published a research summary examining current uses of non-custodial decentralized finance (DeFi), the protocol mechanisms that underpin participation, and the structural frictions that impede wider adoption. The report finds users increasingly treating non-custodial protocols as practical alternatives for staking, lending, trading, and managing assets, but highlights complexity, fragmentation, and time costs as persistent barriers. Orokai advocates aggregation layers that standardize interactions while preserving user custody, and emphasizes growing attention to transparency and risk awareness over headline yields.

Key Points

  • Non-custodial DeFi is increasingly used for practical financial functions such as staking, lending, trading, and asset management.
  • Operational complexity and fragmentation across protocols remain primary obstacles to broader adoption of non-custodial DeFi.
  • Aggregation layers can reduce friction by standardizing user interactions while leaving custody of assets with individual users.

Dubai, United Arab Emirates, February 2, 2026 - Orokai has released a research summary that reviews how non-custodial decentralized finance (DeFi) is being used today and identifies the structural factors that continue to restrict broader uptake.

The paper inspects incentive mechanisms at the protocol level, the responsibilities users assume in non-custodial models, and the potential role of aggregation layers in decreasing operational complexity while ensuring users retain custody of their assets.


Why users are looking on-chain

Orokai frames increased interest in non-custodial DeFi against a backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty and persistent inflation, which have prompted both retail and institutional investors to search for alternatives to conventional banking products. According to the research, traditional savings vehicles and other customary instruments frequently struggle to preserve real purchasing power, encouraging exploration of on-chain models that can offer staking rewards, borrowing options, trading facilities, and tools for asset management.

The company’s internal analysis suggests that the sector is moving beyond an early experimental stage into more structured on-chain participation. Interpreting that evolution, however, requires rethinking how custody functions when the user, rather than an intermediary, controls the keys.


From intermediaries to immutable code

Orokai contrasts conventional finance, where recurring yields - such as dividends, bond coupons, or interest - typically require placing assets under the control of intermediary institutions, with non-custodial DeFi. In traditional models, banks and asset managers custody assets, execute transactions, and determine access, a structure which carries counterparty risk and operational constraints.

By contrast, non-custodial DeFi keeps assets in wallets controlled by users and relies on smart contracts to interact with protocols. As Orokai states, “The defining characteristic of this model is sovereignty.” The research adds: “Participants are not requesting access to their own funds. They interact with predefined, immutable code that executes automatically and continuously.”


Core mechanisms examined

The summary deconstructs four principal mechanisms that typically appear in non-custodial DeFi:

  • Staking - Assets are committed to support proof-of-stake networks, and rewards are distributed according to rules defined by the protocol.
  • Liquidity provision - Assets are supplied to decentralized exchange pools and transaction fees are algorithmically distributed among providers.
  • Lending markets - Capital is supplied to borrowers via over-collateralized smart contracts, shifting credit risk mitigation from discretionary underwriting to code-enforced conditions.
  • Collateral strategies - Holders use existing on-chain positions as collateral to access additional liquidity without liquidating underlying assets.

Operational friction and fragmentation

A central conclusion of the research is that operational complexity remains a dominant barrier to wider adoption. Fragmentation across different protocols, inconsistent user interfaces, and the time costs associated with assessing security, audits, and transaction economics continue to constrain participation.

Orokai highlights the scarcity of time as a practical constraint for most investors: “Time is the most limited resource for any investor,” the team notes. The research explains that spending weeks poring over protocol documentation, audit reports, and fee structures across multiple networks is not realistic for a broad set of participants, and that this complexity is a material impediment to scaling non-custodial use.


Aggregation-first approach

To address these frictions, Orokai outlines an aggregation-first approach designed to unify access to selected non-custodial protocols without assuming custody of user funds. The aggregation layers described in the research seek to reduce operational friction by standardizing interaction patterns and abstracting technical complexity, while allowing assets to remain in user-controlled wallets.

Rather than holding or managing funds, the aggregation layer functions as a standardized interface to vetted protocol opportunities, aiming to streamline decision-making and execution for users who want to remain in control of their keys.


Shift toward transparency and risk-conscious participation

The research observes a sector-wide move away from unsustainable headline yields toward greater emphasis on transparency and risk awareness. Orokai notes that on-chain systems make every transaction verifiable in public ledgers, which allows market participants to directly review activity instead of relying on intermediaries’ disclosures.

“The ongoing shift toward non-custodial and transparent on-chain systems is reshaping how yield mechanisms are designed and accessed,” the Orokai team stated in the summary.


About Orokai

Orokai describes itself as a non-custodial DeFi platform that aggregates vetted opportunities in staking, lending, and yield farming. The platform aims to simplify engagement with selected on-chain protocols while ensuring asset custody remains with users.

For more information, Orokai provides a contact point and web address: https://orokai.com and [email protected]

Risks

  • Operational complexity and fragmented interfaces limit participation - affecting retail and institutional segments seeking accessible on-chain solutions.
  • Time costs for evaluating protocols, audits, and transaction economics may deter investors - impacting capital inflows into non-custodial DeFi protocols.
  • A shift away from headline yields toward transparency and risk awareness could compress returns for participants accustomed to unsustainable yield figures - influencing yield-seeking strategies in the crypto ecosystem.

More from Cryptocurrency

MEET48 Burns 8.7 Million IDOL Tokens, Retires 30% of Voting Proceeds from 'MEET48 Best7' Jan 30, 2026 Bitcoin retreats to about $83,000 as liquidations and Fed leadership uncertainty weigh on markets Jan 30, 2026 Bitcoin Falls to Yearly Low as Markets React to U.S. Crypto Legislative Push Jan 29, 2026 Sky Frontier Projects $611M Gross Protocol Revenue in 2026 as USDS Supply Nears $21B Jan 29, 2026 Status Reboots: Satirical Web Cartoon, Unified Privacy App and Gasless L2 Relaunch Jan 29, 2026